Quantcast
Connect with us

Retired police chief: Daniel Hambrick’s killing is part of ‘the long tradition of police officers shooting first’

Published

on

On Wednesday, the Nashville, Tennessee District Attorney released a video showing the fatal shooting of 25-year-old Daniel Hambrick by Nashville police officer Andrew Delke.

Hambrick was black, and Delke is white.

The video shows Delke firing his gun as Hambrick runs away. One of the bullets hits him in the back and he collapses on a lawn. He was later pronounced dead.

Prior to the release of the video, the department claimed that Hambrick had been armed and that the gun was found at the scene.

The local Fraternal Order of Police is still standing behind the white officer, claiming Delke’s decision to shoot Hambrick was “absolutely necessary and reasonable” and that currently undisclosed information will exonerate him.

ADVERTISEMENT

A thorough investigation has yet to be conducted. But it’s hard to see any justification for firing at a man’s back as he flees.

Raw Story spoke with retired Seattle Police Chief and criminal justice reformer Norm Stamper about the video.

“I have an emotional reaction and a professional, procedural reaction,” Stamper tells Raw Story. “My emotional reaction is, this is a classic example of a police officer who appears not to have much respect for the sanctity of human life. A white cop shooting a fleeing black man … and there are all kinds of questions about the gun.” He points out that the gun that was allegedly found near Hambrick’s body is not clearly visible in the footage.

ADVERTISEMENT

“With all of the objectivity I can muster, what I see is a police officer who is shooting in the back a man who is running away from him. And there appears to be no immediate threat for the officer’s safety and survival.”

“I’m stuck once again with this feeling that we’re not getting through to our police officers,” Stamper says. “We’re not being effective in communicating to every police officer that the preservation of human life is their top priority.”

Stamper says that during his decades in public service, he’s frequently encountered the attitude that the top priority for police is to make it home to their families at night. That’s understandable. But Stamper adds that it’s somewhat shortsighted to presume that an officer’s safety conflicts with the communities they’re supposed to serve.

ADVERTISEMENT

“A philosophy that respects the santicty of human life is beneficial to them because it makes their work easier,” he points out.

“There’s so much distrust between police and communities of color. Between white cops and black citizens. There’s such a long tradition of police officers shooting first and asking questions later.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

FLASHBACK: Jeffrey Epstein accuser revealed there are tapes of famous men with underage girls

Published

on

A 2015 report is resurfacing on Raw Story as the Jeffrey Epstein trial begins and Washington and New York men fear being outed.

It appears that a series of QAnon Facebook groups and pro-Trump groups were the ones responsible for posting the story.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Fox News is so obsessed with Ocasio-Cortez they said her name three times as much as CNN or MSNBC

Published

on

It's clear that Fox News and other right-wing reporters are trying to create boogymen in Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. A new analysis by CNN media reporter Brian Stelter, revealed that the conservative network has said Ocasio-Cortez's name more than CNN and MSNBC combined.

"First, Ocasio-Cortez and her "Squad" mate Ilhan Omar have been talked about a lot more on Fox than on other cable news channels this year," Stelter wrote. "Second, the freshmen have been getting more attention on cable than seasoned leaders of the Democratic Party."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Congress should ask Mueller these specific questions about Trump’s involvement with Russia: Conservative columnist

Published

on

Conservative Never-Trump columnist Jennifer Rubin outlined the essential questions that Democrats should ask special counsel Robert Mueller in an op-ed for the Washington Post.

"Rather than engage in the normal scattershot questioning punctuated by speechifying, the House Judiciary Committee should assign its able attorney Norman Eisen to conduct the questioning," proposed Rubin. "Members could then follow up with additional questions.'

One question she proposed asking: "Mr. Mueller, the attorney general said you did not find 'collusion.' However, you did not look for collusion. Please explain what you looked for and how that differs from [Attorney General William] Barr’s assertion that you essentially cleared President Trump of collusion?"

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image