Quantcast
Connect with us

Trial lawyer tells CNN that Giuliani’s bumbling cable news spots have put Trump in ‘significant legal peril’

Published

on

Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani’s bumbling cable news interviews aren’t just good fodder for late-night comedians — they also might be adding to President Donald Trump’s legal jeopardy.

During an appearance on CNN Monday, trial attorney Seth Berenzweig argued that Giuliani’s frequent cable news spots are harming Trump legally far more than they might be helping him politically.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think Mr. Giuliani is putting his client in significant legal peril,” he said. “If you take a look at what’s going on right now, there are a lot of unforced errors. Just focus on the situation right now with Don McGahn — there could be arguments either way about whether the president wanted to waive privilege, whether he could or should, but at the end of the day, that’s not necessarily a bad strategy. What is utterly shocking is that, when you waive privilege, and then you find out that Don McGahn has been speaking with the special counsel’s office for 30 hours and you’re reading about it when you find out about it in the New York Times? That’s absolutely shocking.”

Berenzweig then went on to hammer the Trump administration for believing they could still claim executive privilege over McGahn’s testimony even though they’ve already made him available as a witness.

“Once waived, it’s waived permanently,” he said. “There’s a lot of misdirection going on and the president is in significant legal peril.”

Toward the end of the segment, the attorney took one more shot at Giuliani’s competence.

“He doesn’t know the facts, he doesn’t know the case, he doesn’t know the law of his own case,” he said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch the video below.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

CNN

White House lawyers were desperate not to talk about Rudy Giuliani — or Trump’s other conspiracy theories: CNN analyst

Published

on

On Saturday, CNN analyst Gloria Borger noted a key piece of the timeline that was conveniently missing from the defense presented by President Donald Trump's legal team: The involvement of Trump's private lawyer Rudy Giuliani.

"The one person that Jay Sekulow didn't mention is Rudy Giuliani, because this is Rudy Giuliani's theory of the game here," said Borger. "They were very careful not to bring up Rudy Giuliani because they know that he is not well regarded in the United States Senate, but if you again look at this summary of the transcript of the president's phone call, the president talks about CrowdStrike, he talks about a lot of things that went on. 'I would like to have the attorney general call you or your people, I would like to have you get to the bottom of it,' this whole nonsense, he talked about Bob Mueller and said a lot of it started with Ukraine."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Pompeo ridiculed by CNN panel for his ‘phony mock outrage’ response after being outed as a foul-mouthed bully

Published

on

Responding to a statement from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued through the State Department accusing an NPR journalist of being "shameless" for going public with an encounter she had with him in his offices where he cursed at her, a CNN panel all but rolled their eyes at his "phony" outrage.

Speaking with host Anderson Cooper, CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin called out the blustery Pompeo as well as many Republicans who took "umbrage" at Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) mentioning a report that the Donald Trump would have their heads on "on a pike" if they crossed him.

Continue Reading
 

CNN

White House lawyers’ Trump defense ‘deteriorated’ as they tried to make the case for the president: CNN’s Toobin

Published

on

As President Donald Trump's legal team put forward their defense of the president's Ukraine scheme at the impeachment trial on Saturday, CNN chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin weighed in on the effectiveness of what they had presented.

"There was information put forth today that would allow Republicans to vote against witnesses and to vote for an acquittal," acknowledged Toobin, offering as an example that the team did a good job at creating doubt over when the Ukrainians knew the foreign aid was cut off. However, "after that I thought it deteriorated."

"I was surprised that Jay Sekulow, who I think is a very fine lawyer, seen him argue in the Supreme Court several times, wandered in the wasteland of the Mueller report, that didn't seem relevant," said Toobin. "Mr. Philbin, who is not a spellbinding performer, went on about how it was legitimate in their view not to respond to subpoenas, not to provide any witnesses by the Trump administration. I thought that was a particularly weak performance. But, you know, if you are inclined to the defense point of view, there were facts and arguments to justify your position this morning."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image