Quantcast
Connect with us

CNN’s Gloria Borger explains how Trump’s Mueller attacks have totally backfired

Published

on

CNN political analyst Gloria Borger said Wednesday that Trump’s persistent attacks on Mueller may have backfired, as a majority of Americans believe the president should sit down and talk with Special Counsel Robert Mueller. This turn of developments may pose a challenge for the president, whose reputation for truthfulness has been called into question by his own staff and attorneys.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pointing to both the “dramatic drop in the president’s approval rating” as well as improving approval levels for Robert Mueller and the Russia probe, host Brooke Baldwin asked Borger if she believed that “President Trump’s attacks, the attacks from Republicans, have backfired.”

“I think people may be sick of hearing it called a ‘witch hunt’, a ‘hoax’ and everything else,” Borger replied. “I think in terms of Bob Mueller, you are seeing results.”

Borger noted Mueller’s successful conviction of Paul Manafort and the plea deal agreed to by Trump’s former personal fixer, Michael Cohen, as well the indictment of 22 Russians for election hacking.

“And you see the conversation that is still ongoing, whether the president ought to testify,” she added, pointing to a poll showing that “more than 70% of the American public believe that the president needs to speak in some way, shape or form to the special counsel.”

“It’s a combination of all of these things,” Borger said, and added, in what could almost be a warning to the president, “don’t forget, the special counsel is quiet and Donald Trump is not.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch the video below


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

CNN

White House lawyers were desperate not to talk about Rudy Giuliani — or Trump’s other conspiracy theories: CNN analyst

Published

on

On Saturday, CNN analyst Gloria Borger noted a key piece of the timeline that was conveniently missing from the defense presented by President Donald Trump's legal team: The involvement of Trump's private lawyer Rudy Giuliani.

"The one person that Jay Sekulow didn't mention is Rudy Giuliani, because this is Rudy Giuliani's theory of the game here," said Borger. "They were very careful not to bring up Rudy Giuliani because they know that he is not well regarded in the United States Senate, but if you again look at this summary of the transcript of the president's phone call, the president talks about CrowdStrike, he talks about a lot of things that went on. 'I would like to have the attorney general call you or your people, I would like to have you get to the bottom of it,' this whole nonsense, he talked about Bob Mueller and said a lot of it started with Ukraine."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Pompeo ridiculed by CNN panel for his ‘phony mock outrage’ response after being outed as a foul-mouthed bully

Published

on

Responding to a statement from Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued through the State Department accusing an NPR journalist of being "shameless" for going public with an encounter she had with him in his offices where he cursed at her, a CNN panel all but rolled their eyes at his "phony" outrage.

Speaking with host Anderson Cooper, CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin called out the blustery Pompeo as well as many Republicans who took "umbrage" at Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) mentioning a report that the Donald Trump would have their heads on "on a pike" if they crossed him.

Continue Reading
 

CNN

White House lawyers’ Trump defense ‘deteriorated’ as they tried to make the case for the president: CNN’s Toobin

Published

on

As President Donald Trump's legal team put forward their defense of the president's Ukraine scheme at the impeachment trial on Saturday, CNN chief legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin weighed in on the effectiveness of what they had presented.

"There was information put forth today that would allow Republicans to vote against witnesses and to vote for an acquittal," acknowledged Toobin, offering as an example that the team did a good job at creating doubt over when the Ukrainians knew the foreign aid was cut off. However, "after that I thought it deteriorated."

"I was surprised that Jay Sekulow, who I think is a very fine lawyer, seen him argue in the Supreme Court several times, wandered in the wasteland of the Mueller report, that didn't seem relevant," said Toobin. "Mr. Philbin, who is not a spellbinding performer, went on about how it was legitimate in their view not to respond to subpoenas, not to provide any witnesses by the Trump administration. I thought that was a particularly weak performance. But, you know, if you are inclined to the defense point of view, there were facts and arguments to justify your position this morning."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image