Fox News contributor Karl Rove can read the tea leaves — and was already predicting a Democratic victory in the House on Monday, 24 hours before election day.
Rove joked that he didn’t want to make any predictions, but added that historically “the party in power loses seats.”
“I think Republicans had a chance to hold the House,” Rove said. “Then the generic ballot got big. Now the generic ballot is getting smaller.”
Rove noted that polls show the Democrats continue to hold double digit leads.
“If it gets down to five or six or four, Republicans keep the House,” he said hopefully. “Realistically the odds are Democrats take the House and take the House narrowly.” He also expected Republicans to maintain a narrow hold on the Senate.
Watch the video below.
Arizona ‘museum fire’ balloons to over 300 acres — and they’re evacuating the area
WATCH: Trump apologist goes down in flames when he claims Democrats don’t get attacked like Trump
Former White House advisor Matt Mowers went down in flames trying to claim Democrats call everyone a racist when they don't agree with them. He had to go back 15 years to find an example, but still never fully explained what the example was.
In a panel discussion with MSNBC's Kasie Hunt, Mowers employed the "what about" strategy, spinning the idea that Trump's racist remarks were justified because Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) used an anti-Semitic trope. To be fair, Omar apologized and met with community leaders and officials to better understand anti-Semitism. Trump can't even admit when he did something wrong, much less racist.
Congress should ask Mueller these specific questions about Trump’s involvement with Russia: Conservative columnist
Conservative Never-Trump columnist Jennifer Rubin outlined the essential questions that Democrats should ask special counsel Robert Mueller in an op-ed for the Washington Post.
"Rather than engage in the normal scattershot questioning punctuated by speechifying, the House Judiciary Committee should assign its able attorney Norman Eisen to conduct the questioning," proposed Rubin. "Members could then follow up with additional questions.'
One question she proposed asking: "Mr. Mueller, the attorney general said you did not find 'collusion.' However, you did not look for collusion. Please explain what you looked for and how that differs from [Attorney General William] Barr’s assertion that you essentially cleared President Trump of collusion?"