Quantcast
Connect with us

Here’s how Trump inadvertently exposed his allegiance to the petro-tyrants of Russia and Saudi Arabia

Published

on

- Commentary
US President Donald Trump (right) and Russia's President Vladimir Putin talk during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) leaders' summit in the central Vietnamese city of Danang on November 11, 2017 (AFP Photo/JORGE SILVA)
Like Dorothy’s dog Toto at the end of “The Wizard of Oz,” Donald Trump just pulled down the curtain and exposed the ugly reality of climate-change denial: It is driven neither by intellectual skepticism nor ideological disagreement but by pure greed, the greed of those who own — or are retained by those who own — oil, coal and natural gas. Climate denial is simply a cynical strategy to perpetuate inflated monopoly prices on fossil fuels.This article was originally published at SalonIn Katowice, Poland, for the first time, the global climate denial bloc linked arms publicly. The U.S. and Russia joined Saudi Arabia and Kuwait in cynically dismissing the latest scientific alarm bells. Not over its science: As Trump climate adviser Wells Griffith proclaimed, “We strongly believe that no country should have to sacrifice their economic prosperity or energy security in pursuit of environmental sustainability.” In other words, oil powers are entitled to their profits, at whatever cost to the rest of us.

ADVERTISEMENT

What does this fearsome threesome have in common? (Kuwait is really just a fellow-traveler to the Saudi monarchy.) Only one thing; oil. Two are petro-states, obsessed with  keeping the price of oil sky-high. The U.S. still imports oil, but Trump has bet his party’s political future on America joining the petro-club. (And perhaps also on adopting the authoritarian political system that, Norway aside, characterizes most oil-dependent countries.)

Behind the curtain, as Katowice makes clear, climate denial is a conspiracy to extend our economic dependence on the fossil fuel monopoly.

Why has climate denial chosen this moment to unveil itself so nakedly? Well, Prince Mohammed bin Salman has adopted a much more aggressive stance for Saudi Arabia than the kingdom’s previous rulers. Trump’s indulgence of Mohammed and Putin has no doubt emboldened them in Poland.

Most important, perhaps, fossil fuel’s dominance, and that of oil in particular, is for the first time seriously threatened. Electric transportation, combined with the final phase-out of oil’s role in the power sector, signals a steady price-sapping decline in demand, beginning within only a few years. In the U.S., that threat has already mobilized oil companies, led by Koch and Marathon, to secretly assault emission and fuel economy standards, as well as policy encouragement for electric cars.

Obviously what links Russia, Trump and the Saudis is not Putin’s desire to restore the Russian empire, or Trump’s deregulatory mania, or Prince Mohammed’s fundamentalist Wahhabi Islam.

ADVERTISEMENT

No, what this unholy four have in common is that three of them are petro-states, and Trump is entirely wedded to the petro-regions within the United States. All of them, in short, need big markets and high demand for oil, although Trump appears to like his crude cheap, while the other three want high prices.

Globally, if electric vehicles take off as expected, by 2030 demand for oil could have shrunk by six million barrels a day – loss at a scale oil producers haven’t faced since the 1970s. That means a huge fall in price. In the last three years, relatively trivial changes in the supply-demand ratio, of less than two million barrels a day, have swung prices up from $30 to $86, and then,  in less than three months, back down to $57. That three-month, $30 slump alone is costing Russia, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia $780 million a day, or $250 billion over a year. The economic stakes from the massive electrification of transportation that is now within the grasp of a global community alarmed by climate change are in the trillions of dollars – and the losers stood up together at Katowice to defend their monopoly.

The United States is a special case. That $55 run-up in oil prices was good for U.S. producers as well as Russians and Saudis – roughly $600 million a day good. But American motorists and shippers paid that bill, topped off by another $450 million a day in increased fuel prices paid for imported fuel. So U.S. transportation costs were pushed up $1 billion a day by the oil price spike – the equivalent of a gas tax increase of more than $1 per gallon. The recent price decline has cut that bill roughly in half. Again, U.S. and foreign producers are sharing the pain, so cheaper oil is clearly overall very good for the U.S. economy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Thanks to Donald Trump, we no longer need to wonder what ideological (much less scientific) perspectives lie behind climate denial. There may indeed be individuals who for ideological or religious reasons are uncomfortable admitting that carbon pollution emitted by our economy is altering the way the weather works and warming the climate. But those individuals are being carried along by a much darker set of forces: Those who profit, politically and financially, from human dependence on fossil fuels to run their economies.

Oscar Zoroaster, the Kansas con man who became the Wizard of Oz, at least had the Midwestern common sense to know that he needed to hide his fakery behind a curtain. Two years in the White House has so puffed up President Trump that he played Toto to his own con, pulling down the curtain that concealed the oily, intimate bond between our nation and the world’s most dangerous petro-powers.

ADVERTISEMENT

But as with Oz, we recognize all too well the president’s tone when he tells us to pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. It’s the voice of a con artist who’s been found out.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Nicolle Wallace bashes ‘two-bit criminal’ Trump for ‘skivvy’ tweet pardoning Michael Flynn

Published

on

Retired Lt. Gen Michael Flynn admitted his guilt to Judge Emmett Sullivan, but President Donald Trump announced that the former director of national intelligence would never see jail time. After issuing a pardon to Flynn the day before Thanksgiving, MSNBC's Nicolle Wallace attacked the manner in which Trump announced the pardon: by tweet.

"Of all the sordid tales of Trump's presidency, this one might take the cake," said Wallace. "We knew this might be coming. We know Donald Trump likes the power to pardon. There's some reporting he's looking at a pardon for lots of other people. I wonder what your sense is about what else Donald Trump has up his sleeve?"

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

NRA tax filing alleges Wayne LaPierre used the group’s funds for ‘personal benefit and enrichment’: report

Published

on

According to a new IRS tax filing from the National Rifle Association (NRA), current and former executives used the nonprofit group’s money for personal benefit and enrichment, the Washington Post reports.

"The NRA said in the filing that it continues to review the alleged abuse of funds, as the tax-exempt organization curtails services and runs up multimillion-dollar legal bills," the Post's report states. "The assertion of impropriety comes four months after the attorney general of New York state filed a lawsuit accusing NRA chief executive Wayne LaPierre and other top officials of using NRA funds for decades to provide inflated salaries and expense accounts."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump and Bill Barr’s ‘bloodthirsty execution spree’ in his final months in office is unprecedented: op-ed

Published

on

In an op-ed for Slate this Tuesday, Austin Sarat says that the Trump administration's announcement that it would continue to carry out executions in the days and weeks leading up to the inauguration of President-elect Joe Biden is a "bloodthirsty decision" that defies "the norms and conventions for modern presidential transitions."

"The Death Penalty Information Center reports that the last time an outgoing administration did anything remotely similar was more than a century ago, in 1889," Sarat writes. "At that time Grover Cleveland, the first Democrat to be elected president after the Civil War and the only president ever to have served as an executioner (when he was the sheriff in Erie County, New York), permitted three executions to proceed in the period between his electoral defeat and Benjamin Harrison’s inauguration in March 1889."

Continue Reading