U.S. Supreme Court justices on Monday appeared skeptical of further limiting the scope of who can be held liable for violating laws that protect investors from securities fraud as they weighed an appeal by a New York investment banker who had been banned from the industry.
Only eight of the nine justices were present to hear arguments over a ruling by a Washington-based federal appeals court that found Francis Lorenzo liable for participating in a scheme to defraud investors when he sent misleading emails about a financially-troubled clean energy company.
Most of the justices seemed to agree with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which had enforced the securities laws against Lorenzo, while Chief Justice John Roberts and fellow conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch, seemed sympathetic to him.
The court has a 5-4 conservative majority. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative appointee of Republican President Donald Trump, did not participate in the case because he was part of the three-judge appeals court panel that previously reviewed the dispute. Kavanaugh joined the high court in October.
Kavanaugh dissented in the appeals court ruling that upheld most of the SEC’s liability findings against Lorenzo, and would have sided with the banker.
The high court must rule in the case by the end of June.
The dispute centers on whether a person who did not personally make fraudulent statements but merely passed them along can be found liable for engaging in a fraudulent scheme. Anti-fraud provisions of U.S. securities laws prohibit false statements and other conduct categorized as acts, devices, practices or schemes.
In 2011 the Supreme Court narrowed the scope of who can be liable for false statements to those with ultimate authority over the statements.
Lorenzo, who served as the investment banking director at a broker-dealer called Charles Vista, sent the emails in 2009 seeking investors for a startup company’s debt offering even though its energy-from-waste technology did not work.
The SEC in 2015 found that he made false statements and participated in a deceptive scheme by sending the emails, which a commission in-house judge said contained “staggering” false claims. The commission fined him $15,000 and barred him from working in the industry for life.
Citing the 2011 Supreme Court precedent, the District of Columbia U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year threw out Lorenzo’s liability over the false statements, saying they were made by his boss. But the court said he was still liable for perpetuating the fraudulent scheme because he knowingly produced and sent the false statements in the emails. It ordered the SEC to reconsider the penalties against Lorenzo.
In appealing to the Supreme Court, Lorenzo said the SEC is trying to paint individuals who might be liable at most for aiding and abetting fraudulent schemes as the primary violators of securities laws.
Lorenzo, who had the support of the powerful U.S. Chamber of Commerce business group, said that if the appeals court is not overturned it will lead to a swarm of abusive lawsuits, harming financial markets and the economy.
The Trump administration, defending the SEC, told the justices that agreeing with Lorenzo would create a loophole in securities laws and significantly undermine their enforcement “by categorically precluding primary liability in any case involving a misstatement that the defendant himself did not ‘make.’”
Reporting by Andrew Chung; editing by Grant McCool
Trump privately treating impeachment trial like season-ending reality show ‘grand finale’: report
The former reality TV star currently serving as president of the United States is viewing his impeachment as a television production, The Washington Post reported Saturday.
"By Friday, even as the House Judiciary Committee passed two articles of impeachment against Trump, the president had begun telling allies that maybe impeachment wasn’t so bad after all," the newspaper reported. "All week, in fact, at White House holiday parties and in phone calls with allies, Trump privately mused about trying to prolong the impeachment process because he says it helps his reelection prospects."
Lindsey Graham admits nothing will change his mind on Trump impeachment: ‘I’m not trying to pretend to be a fair juror’
In an interview with CNN International's Becky Anderson at the Doha Forum in Qatar, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) admitted he has no plans to look at the evidence compiled against Donald Trump from the House impeachment inquiry when it is referred to the Senate.
The chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee explained that he wants the trial to be quick and that expects nothing to come of it, with the GOP solidly behind fighting impeachment of the president.
During the interview Graham stated, "This thing will come to the Senate, and it will die quickly, and I will do everything I can to make it die quickly."
Ivanka buried for only taking softball questions from State Dept PR official at international forum: ‘Princess Grifter doing a photo op’
On Saturday, first daughter Ivanka Trump sat for an interview with a former Fox News contributor turned State Department PR official at the Doha Forum in Qatar, during which she was asked a series of softball questions designed to play up her supposed contributions to women's rights and what she hopes to do to ensure a positive legacy.