Quantcast
Connect with us

These ex-federal prosecutors argue Giuliani’s baffling statements point to a new damning revelation

Published

on

This was a very bad week for defenders of President Donald Trump’s blamelessness in the Russian plot to attack the 2016 presidential election. Not only is the president facing new — and impeachment-worthy — allegations that he instructed his Michael Cohen to lie to Congress about a proposed real estate project in Moscow, his attorney Rudy Giuliani made an astonishing about-face from his months-long refrain in a CNN interview on Wednesday, now claiming that he never said there was no collusion with Russia in the Trump campaign, only that Trump himself wasn’t involved in it:

This is a lie, of course. Both Giuliani and Trump have repeatedly said there was no collusion, period. Indeed, Giuliani seemed to walk back his statement later, saying he wasn’t aware of any collusion by anyone else either. But Giuliani’s change in strategy was not lost on former federal prosecutors Mimi Rocah and Joyce Vance in an editorial for NBC News, analyzing Giuliani’s legal flip-flop.

“Let’s be clear, Giuliani’s conversation with Cuomo does not represent a subtle, nuanced shift in position. This is an admission by the president’s lawyer that when the president said ‘no collusion’ and when he himself claimed there was no collusion by anyone, let alone “the top four or five people in the campaign,” they were not telling the truth,” write Rocah and Vance. “Of course, if the position had always been that maybe there was collusion, but Trump wasn’t involved, the response to the special counsel’s investigation would have been to fully cooperate. Any rational leader in this position would want to know who the bad actors were in his or her campaign. But that was not the response, because that has not been the position — until now.”

Why did Giuliani essentially admit he and his boss had been lying the whole time? Rocah and Vance have a theory.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Giuliani is technically Trump’s lawyer,” they write. “But the strategy he has been running since he joined the team in April 2018 is a political one, not a legal one. None of what he does is meant to convince a judge or a jury. It is meant to confuse the issues, to inoculate people against shocking news before it arrives, and to retain the president’s good standing with his base. This is important because if the new Democratic House decides to file articles of impeachment against the president, Trump needs to have enough support among Republicans to ensure his majority in the Senate will hold. Giuliani has been moving the goal posts to accommodate the facts, always giving the president a retrenched argument.”

This is, they write, not generally a good strategy from a legal perspective. But it might be the only one that suits Trump.

“One of the only things that Giuliani has been consistently good at is getting out ahead of bad facts before they surface in the press or in pleadings,” they continue. “When there is bad news coming, Giuliani blurts it out, the public gawks, and the shock is absorbed in advance. Giuliani, with his theatrics, socializes bad news so well that by the time it drops, most people are numb to it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“In the face of mounting evidence that there was collusion between members of the campaign and Russians, Giuliani has doubled down on his strategy of distract, shock and confuse,” Rocah and Vance conclude. “But the position that he has staked out — that Trump was unaware of what others might have done — won’t get him very far with anyone who is paying attention.”

The obvious question then will be — is the country paying attention?

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

CNN

CNN went to the heartland — and found voters who love AOC and The Squad: ‘The best thing ever’

Published

on

CNN's Van Jones traveled this week to speak with a panel of Pennsylvania voters about the 2020 presidential campaign.

Jones also asked the panel about the schism in the Democratic Party between Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and the members known as The Squad, who are Representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Ilhan Omar (D-MN), Ayanna Pressley (D-MA), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI).

"You have Democrats fighting each other in the primary. Democrats fighting each other in the House. What do you think about the AOC versus Pelosi dynamic?" Jones asked. "How do you read that? How do you read that?"

Continue Reading

CNN

Soccer superstar Megan Rapinoe has the perfect answer for Trump’s claim America can’t be criticized

Published

on

As President Donald Trump continued his racist targeting of four women of color in Congress, he attempted to excuse his racism by claiming it was justified as the lawmakers had criticized America.

“I can tell you this, you can’t talk that way about our country. Not when I am the president,” Trump threatened.

Soccer superstar Megan Rapinoe was asked about her take on patriotism during an interview with CNN's Van Jones that aired Saturday evening.

"I think I’m super patriotic. I do consider myself extremely patriotic," Rapinoe said.

"I think, like, we love in America to talk about, you know, how good we are, and how like we want to save the world, and always intervening in places because they’re not doing it right. Meanwhile, at home, we’re not even doing that oftentimes for our own people," she explained.

Continue Reading
 

CNN

CNN’s Republican anchor rips GOP for allowing Trump’s racism: ‘What a load of crap’

Published

on

CNN anchor S.E. Cupp on Saturday blasted the Republican Party for enabling President Donald Trump's racism.

"Welcome to 'Unfiltered,' in what might be the ugliest week of his presidency so far, Donald Trump went from dipping a toe in the pool of white nationalism to bathing in it," Cupp declared.

First, there was the racist tweetstorm he told four women of color, elected representatives no less -- to go back to their own countries. Then his followers took his cues and responded, chanting “Send her back” about Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-MN) at a rally in North Carolina," she reported.

Continue Reading
 
 
 

Copyright © 2019 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections or concerns, please email [email protected]

Join Me. Try Raw Story Investigates for $1. Invest in Journalism. Escape Ads.
close-image