Quantcast
Connect with us

‘Was it worth it?’ CNN host corners Louisiana Republican after GOP takes huge approval hit after shutdown

Published

on

Louisiana Republican Senator John Kennedy found himself in the hot seat on Thursday as CNN’s Brooke Baldwin forced him to say whether President Donald Trump’s shutdown was “worth it”, after the president came away with nothing and the Republican party suffered a massive hit to its approval rating.

Baldwin, noting the Republicans’ predicament, had one question for Kennedy: “was it worth it?” Kennedy, for his part, took a folksy tone, and tried to skirt the issue.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think that’s part of the problem here, Brooke,” he said. “I think so many folks on Capitol Hill have been looking at this for a political lens.” He then played politics, insinuating that his Democratic colleagues were weak on border security, and threw a lot of words at Baldwin in an effort to change the subject. She wasn’t having it.

“Sir, sir sir, the question was, from December 22 to just a couple days ago when he finally reopened the government, it was the same speech we basically heard from the beginning and nothing really changed,” she said impatiently.
“He caved. Was it worth it, is my question, yes or no?”

Kennedy’s face turned red, and his jowls began shaking as the Senator stammered and stuttered before finally shouting, “Yes! It’s not over yet.”

“‘Yes, it was worth it?'” said an astonished Baldwin. “Yes, it was worth it that for 35 days, all these hundreds of thousands of Americans were not paid, were rationing asthma medicine, it was worth it? For what?”

“Let me say it again, legal immigration makes our country stronger, but illegal immigration is illegal. Duh,” a visibly angry Kennedy replied by way of defending his stance. “One way to stop it is to secure the border and you can’t secure the border without a barrier or a wall or a wangdoodle or whatever we’re calling it.” He

ADVERTISEMENT

“Do I want a shutdown? No,” he went on. “And before your editors write the headline that says ‘Kennedy says it was all worth it’, I don’t support, I don’t support shut downs.”

Watch the video below.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

GOP shamed by a presidential historian for not taking impeachment seriously

Published

on

Following the House Judiciary Committee's historic vote, sending two articles of impeachment against Donald Trump to the House floor, presidential historian Tim Naftali broke down why this impeachment was both important and different from previous ones.

Sitting on the panel with host Wolf Blitzer and CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin, Naftali began, "Impeachment is the last best defense against those who would abuse their power. In our history, four times the Congress has turned to that tool to deal with a president that for one reason or another they felt was a challenge to the constitutional order."

Continue Reading

CNN

‘It’s all distractions’: CNN panel obliterates GOP for totally refusing to discuss Trump’s conduct

Published

on

A CNN panel on Thursday obliterated House Republicans for once again completely ignoring the substance of allegations against President Donald Trump and instead throwing out numerous distractions intended to deflect attention from the president's actions.

"It's been distractions about the Bidens, it's been distractions about conspiracy theories about Ukraine's involvement in the election," said CNN legal analyst Carrie Cordero. "Yesterday, it was distractions about FISA and FISA so-called abuse. It was distractions from Congressman Gohmert reading calls from 1943! It's been all distractions and they won't wrestle with the actual conduct."

Continue Reading
 

CNN

CNN’s Jake Tapper does line-by-line fact check of Jim Jordan’s nonstop misleading statements during impeachment hearing

Published

on

Host Jake Tapper did a special web fact-check for CNN.com where he looked line-by-line into Rep. Jim Jordan's (R-OH) claims about the impeachment proceedings.

He had four specific talking points that were disingenuous and outright false.

1. Jordan: "There was no quid pro quo in the transcript"

There absolutely was evidence in the summary of the transcript. Tapper began by explaining that Americans still haven't seen the full transcript or a recording of the July 25 phone call between President Donald Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky.

"If you read the summary of the transcript it clearly shows that after a discussion of U.S. military support for Ukraine, President Trump said the relationship is not 'reciprocal' and he asks Zelensky for 'a favor,'" Tapper said. "The favor? To investigate a conspiracy theory into the 2016 election and later in the call he says, 'one other thing,' he wants Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter."

Continue Reading