Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump is losing federal court cases at an unprecedented rate due to sloppiness and absence of facts in filings: report

Published

on

According to a report at the Washington Post, the administration of Donald Trump has a stunning fail rate when it comes  to getting his policies implemented without federal judges smacking them down because they don’t meet minimums of legal reasoning.

Reporting on a database compiled by the Institute for Policy Integrity at the New York University School of Law, the Post reports that “the normal ‘win rate’ for administration officials to get new policies implemented with court approval is 70 percent. Under Trump, it has fallen to an almost non-existent 6 percent.

ADVERTISEMENT

The report notes that administration lawyers are being hamstrung by having to present cases handed to them by policymakers that are woefully short on both facts and reasoning.

“In case after case, judges have rebuked Trump officials for failing to follow the most basic rules of governance, including providing legitimate explanations for shifts in policy, supported by facts and, where required, public input,” the Post reports, adding, “The rulings so far paint a remarkable portrait of a government rushing to implement sweeping changes in policy without regard for longstanding rules against arbitrary and capricious behavior.

While pointing out that many of the losses are under appeal, the report notes that there seems to be little interest at times in actually succeeding on policies that appear to have been done for show.

According to Seth Jaffe, a Boston-based lawyer who represents large corporations looking to undercut environmental laws, “This administration has given regulatory reform a bad name.”

The attorney accused some policymakers in the administration of putting ideology way before governance — which is why they are going down to defeat at a record pace.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s not just that they’re losing. But they’re being so nuts about it,” Jaffe lamented.

Matthew Collette, the former deputy director of the Justice Department’s Civil Division appellate staff who served for over 30 years, admitted the rate of losses is unprecedented, remarking. “I don’t think there’s any doubt about that.”

In a case over the Trump’ administrations plan to end some $200 million in Health and Human Services grants to 81 teen-pregnancy-prevention programs, one judges was incredulous at the government argument for pulling the plug.

ADVERTISEMENT

“During a hearing in Washington last April, U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed incredulity about the manner in which the agency had acted,” the Post reports. “Can an agency suddenly say ‘too bad, so sad,’ Jackson asked a lawyer for the government, and cut off money without cause? When the lawyer answered yes, the judge called the situation ‘weird’ and ordered the grants restored.”

In another case asking for the government to be let off the hook for environmental cleanups, another judge was equally harsh because the administration never asked for public input as dictated by the law.

ADVERTISEMENT

“U.S. District Judge David Norton of South Carolina, an appointee of President George H.W. Bush, gave the Trump administration a tongue-lashing, calling its approach ‘evasive,’ in addition to being ‘arbitrary and capricious’,” the report states.

According to Jonathan Adler, a Case Western Reserve University law professor who feels there are too many regulations, “If your goal is to change policy, the little extra time” to explain “is worth it. Various administrations don’t always like that lesson — this administration more than most.”

You can read more here.

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

In Trump’s ‘murder the messenger’ White House ‘it’s survival of the morally sickest’: conservative

Published

on

In his column for the Daily Beast, conservative -- and former Republican -- Matt Lewis explained that Donald Trump's decision to turn on Dr. Anthony Fauci is yet another example of his habit of destroying advisers who don't tell him what he wants to hear which is why and, in this case, more Americans are going to die in the coronavirus pandemic.

As Lewis notes, Fauci, who has been brutally frank about the resurgent COVID-19 health crisis that is now swamping Arizona, Texas and Florida, joins a long line of high profile administration officials who have found themselves on the president's hit list for not toeing the administration's line.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Florida nurses bust Ron DeSantis for dismissing COVID-19 explosion as a ‘blip’

Published

on

The coronavirus pandemic is growing worse in Florida, but Gov. Ron DeSantis insists the explosion in cases is just a "blip."

The state recorded more than 15,300 new cases Sunday, and the positivity rate had exploded to 11.25 percent -- a 56-percent jump from a month ago -- but DeSantis disagrees with medical providers who warn the worst is yet to come, reported The Daily Beast.

“We’ve got the census today," DeSantis said Friday, before the weekend's dire numbers. "I think between 10 and 12 or 13,000 — somewhere like that — beds are available. There’ll be articles saying, ‘Oh, my gosh. They’re at 90 percent.’ Well, that’s how hospitals normally run.”

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Rest in pieces, Redskins. Now here are sports’ other weird, dumb or suspect nicknames

Published

on

They are out there. Fans of the Washington football club formerly known as “Redskins” who are genuinely upset that their team is burying some of its tradition and heritage with the nickname change that the franchise officially announced Monday was coming.Which invites the question: Can you be indignant and angry while simultaneously wearing a rubber hog’s nose strapped on your face?Oft times elements of tradition and heritage are lousy things to celebrate. Slavery, for example.Fans angry at the disappearance of Redskins show the same misplaced outrage you see from folks attaching great signifi... (more…)

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image