Quantcast
Connect with us

Here are 5 lies Trump defenders are guaranteed to tell about the Mueller report — and why you shouldn’t believe them

Published

on

- Commentary

Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report is set to be made public on Thursday, and only a small group of people knows for sure what it will say.

But the report itself is, primarily, about the special counsel’s prosecutorial and declination decisions — that is, why he did and did not bring charges against specific individuals. At just under 400 pages, the report almost certainly will discuss Mueller’s decision to prosecute Russian hackers, the Russian troll farms, Paul Manafort, Michael Cohen, Roger Stone, Michael Flynn, and several other people both inside and outside President Donald Trump’s orbit. More interesting, though, will be who Mueller declined to prosecute and why — this includes Trump himself, who the report will address in a section discussing a potential charge for obstruction of justice.

ADVERTISEMENT

Much of the most interesting information may be redacted for a variety of reasons. And we don’t know what new information we’ll discover until the report is revealed. We can expect, however, that Trump’s defenders can and will lie extensively about the report — because they’ve already been lying about it and have been lying about the investigation since day one.

Here are five lies you can expect to hear once the report is published — and why you shouldn’t believe them.

1. “There was no crime.”

Trump has already made this false claim.

“I heard it’s going to come out on Thursday. That’s good. And there can’t be anything there because there was no crime. There was no anything,” said Trump to an ABC News affiliate KSTP on Monday. “The crime was committed by the other side. This crime was all made up. It was all a fabrication.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Though ABC News presented this quote without comment, it’s clearly false based on what we already know. Mueller has charged dozens of crimes. Many of them deal with Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election, a crime which Trump has repeatedly ignored, downplayed, or outright denied as a “hoax.” And crucially, many of Trump’s aides — Manafort, Cohen, Flynn, and George Papadopoulos — have been found to have lied in an effort to cover up the Trump team’s ties to Russia and its interference campaign. Roger Stone, a longtime friend of Trump, also appears to have lied during the investigation to cover up his connections to the interference effort, though his case is still pending.

2. “Trump wasn’t involved in any crimes.”

Even as so many of Trump’s aides and associates were caught up in the Mueller probe, the president and his defenders have continually argued that he had nothing to do with any of the crimes.

ADVERTISEMENT

But this is clearly not so. We know Trump had more ties to Russia than he let on during the campaign — including a massive pending deal to build a Trump Tower Moscow. He covered up these ties while the Russian government was aiding his campaign effort, and he denied the fact that Russia was helping him.

After the campaign, he continued to lie about his ties to Russia and dismiss the charges of the Kremlin’s role in the election. And he made clear what his claims would be about the investigation: He had no ties and “no collusion” with Russia. While the president was promoting this lie, several of his former aides engaged in a criminal cover-up by lying to investigators about Russia. Cohen has even recently told Congress that his lies to the House Intelligence Committee, distorting the truth about the Trump Tower Moscow deal, were done as a part of an effort to please the president and tell a cover story consistent with Trump’s lies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Mueller may have decided that Trump could not be decisively shown to be criminally responsible for these other crimes, but he is clearly morally and politically culpable for illegal lies told on his behalf and at his urging.

3. “Trump has been exonerated.”

But Mueller’s report won’t just leave it there. We know from Attorney General Bill Barr’s letter about the report’s principal conclusions that the special counsel did not make a decision on the obstruction of justice question. Instead, he lays out the case for and against the charge that Trump obstructed justice, Barr said — apparently leaving the final determination to the public and to Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

Though Barr has weighed in to say he doesn’t believe an obstruction charge is warranted, he quoted Mueller as clearly saying, “this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

So anyone claiming that the president has been exonerated by Mueller is just flat-out lying.

4. “The report is irrelevant.”

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders has already been dismissing talk about the upcoming report, saying, “We consider this matter closed.” Rep. Devin Nunes (D-CA) says the report is so partisan and irrelevant “we can just burn it up.” Even some Democrats have diminished its importance; Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) noted how little the subject comes up on the campaign trail.

ADVERTISEMENT

And though it may be true that the Mueller report is unlikely to change many minds about Trump’s fitness for office, it’s clear people care and are interested. According to a CNN poll, 87 percent of Americans want the report to be released in full; it’s almost impossible to get that much agreement on a subject in the U.S. unless you’re asking about the approval of cupcakes. Clearly, people care about the report and want it to be freely available — and it’s not just a group of journalists and politicos who are interested.

5. “The Mueller report tells us everything we need to know.”

People on all sides of the issue might be inclined to declare “case closed” after the report is released. The story of the 2016 election has dragged on far longer than is typical, and there is an urge to move on to discuss other important, deserving topics.

But no matter what it says, the Mueller report won’t be the end of the story — for better or for worse. As the recent charges against former Obama White House Counsel Greg Craig showed, leads from Mueller’s investigation are still being pursued by the Justice Department.

ADVERTISEMENT

And Mueller’s report is sure to have many redactions, some of which will cover material related to ongoing investigations. The government has already said that matters uncovered in the Manafort and Stone investigations are still being pursued; cooperators Flynn and former Trump Deputy Campaign Chair Rick Gates have participated in other relevant investigations. And we know that at least one cases, Cohen’s criminal campaign hush money payments that have been charged by the Southern District of New York, already implicates the president.

Democrats are likely to fight to get the report as unredacted as possible, either for public viewing or at least for lawmakers themselves. But there may be important counterintelligence information that is left out of the report entirely.

Whatever Mueller has found and put in his report, the story itself is still unfolding — if for no other reason than the fact that Russia is still trying to interfere in American elections.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Stop praising anti-Trump evangelicals: Their embrace of authoritarianism is a big part of the problem

Published

on

At this critical moment for American democracy our media landscape is doing a poor job in its coverage of conservative white evangelicals. Coverage of this relatively large segment of the population is characterized by, on the one hand, effusive praise for the slightest milquetoast criticism of Donald Trump, and on the other, by a periodic parade of nearly interchangeable unfounded predictions about how evangelical youth are going to change America’s most radically right-wing demographic for the better—any day now. In the words of the great sage Bullwinkle J. Moose, “This time for sure!”

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Decoding the Christian paradox: Evangelical historian explains how right-wingers ignore Jesus to support a corrupt and greedy president

Published

on

To quote the bumper sticker: "What would Jesus do?"

Assuming that he existed and held the views imputed to him, Jesus Christ would not support Donald Trump.

Donald Trump's behavior, values, policies and their consequences are the opposite of what Jesus Christ represented. Trump has put migrants and refugees in cages and delighted in their suffering. He feels contempt for the poor, the sick, the vulnerable and the needy. He has lied at least 16,000 times. He is corrupt and wildly greedy.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

America could be on the verge of a huge shift to the left — here’s what you can expect

Published

on

By

A new socialist movement is cohering in the US, thanks in large part to the popular class politics of Bernie Sanders. But as that movement grows and progresses, it is bound to run into dangerous obstacles and thorny contradictions. The new US socialist movement is without a single "line" or monolithic political position. That's a strength of the movement, since none of us has all the answers. Still, many people in the movement, ourselves included, feel strongly about certain approaches to strategy. One approach we feel strongly about is what we call "the democratic road to socialism," or the idea that we need to make good use of the democratic structures and processes available to us (and to improve and expand them) in order to advance our cause.A country like the United States has both a well-developed capitalist state, beholden to the capitalist class and armed to the teeth, and mechanisms for democratic participation in that state that allow people to exercise some measure of control over their representatives. Even though their choices are limited, their representatives are bought off by the rich, and the capitalist class holds the entire system hostage with the threat of devastating economic retaliation if things don't go their way, the system does have some basic democratic elements that its citizens largely affirm and occasionally participate in.This is a tricky situation to navigate. If the democratic capitalist state were less developed, it might be possible to convince people to simply storm the gates, tear up the old rules, and start fresh in a socialist society. This is what socialists tried to do in Russia in 1917: the state was weak and after centuries of autocratic rule it didn't have much legitimacy in the eyes of most Russians, so revolutionaries could get popular support for scrapping it and starting over.
Continue Reading
 
 
close-image