Quantcast
Connect with us

Opening statements show pharma giant intends to shame addicts in first opioid trial

Published

on

Brad Beckworth for the State of Oklahoma speaking in opioid trial (Photo: Screen capture)

Pharma giant intends to shame addicts in first opioid trial, if their opening statements are any indication.

Tuesday began the first public opioid trial in the country, as the state of Oklahoma went after Johnson & Johnson for the epidemic residents face. While the Oklahoma lawyers used up nearly two hours to explain their case, Johnson & Johnson used a video they did to show the personal responsibility of children who take prescription drugs recreationally.

ADVERTISEMENT

The narrative J&J is pushing harkens back to an era of labeling drug addicts as bad people who clearly did something bad and now must face the consequences. However, what the Oklahoma attorneys addressed is quite the opposite. In the opening statement, the state compared J&J to Purdue Pharma, the creator of oxycontin/oxycodone, and using an aggressive marketing strategy to encourage doctors, surgeons, nurses and more medical professionals to use opioids, claiming they’re safe.

J&J attorneys explained that they don’t market opioids to children or any minors. They’re right, what they did was encourage doctors to prescribe opioids to young people as part of a campaign around Spring Break. “For sprains and strains,” opioids could be given to youth, J&J argued.

The state introduced five families who would testify about dealing with an addict of opioids. But when Johnson & Johnson had an opportunity to give their opening statement they attacked one of the families who lost a child by saying that the boy was smoking marijuana long before he died from opioids.

“Starting this epidemic was easy. Fixing it is going to be hard,” said attorney Reggie Whitten, for the state of Oklahoma. “There’s nothing you can do about the past… only this court has the power to look forward and fix this. In this court, we become level — its a level playing field. They have all the money and all the power. But Oklahoma has this court.”

Whitten, who lost his own son to opioid abuse, noted that shaming addicts is part of the opioid crisis.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s different from cancer or diabetes,” Whitten said in the opening statement. “Can you imagine society telling people ‘you need more willpower’ not insulin? Their loved ones got sick with a manmade disease.”

In some arguments, big pharma suggests that like cigarettes, no one ever forced people to use opioids. But the argument flies in the face of doctors being the trusted advisors, who pharmaceutical companies lobbied to prescribe opioids. The state said that they intend to show evidence that Johnson & Johnson lied to doctors about whether the drugs were habit forming.

Watch the opening statements below and the streaming video of the trial:

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

WATCH: Van Jones delivers epic lecture on CNN after Trump ‘refused to condemn white supremacy’

Published

on

CNN political analyst Van Jones tore into Donald Trump after the president's highly controversial decision to repeatedly refuse to condemn white supremacy at the first 2020 general election debate.

"Only three things happened for me tonight," Jone said.

"Number one, Donald Trump refused to condemn white supremacy," he explained.

"Number two, the president of the United States refused to condemn white supremacy," he continued.

"Number three, the commander-in-chief refused to condemn white supremacy on the global stage -- in front of my children, in front of everybody's families -- and he was given the opportunity multiple times to condemn white supremacy," Jones said.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Jake Tapper stunned by Trump’s debate: ‘That was a hot mess inside a dumpster fire inside a train wreck’

Published

on

CNN Jake Tapper reacted in shock on Tuesday following the first presidential debate between Democratic nominee Joe Biden and President Donald Trump.

"That was a hot mess inside a dumpster fire inside a train wreck," Tapper said. "That was the worst debate I have ever seen. In fact, it wasn't even a debate. It was a disgrace."

"And it's primarily because of President Trump," he remarked, "who spent the entire time interrupting, not abiding by the rules that he agreed to, lying, maliciously attacking the son of the vice president. When asked to condemn white supremacists, he brought up the name of a neo-fascist, far-right group and said, 'Stand back and stand by.'"

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Trump causes widespread shock by refusing to call out white supremacy at first 2020 debate

Published

on

President Donald Trump was asked to call out white supremacy during the first 2020 general election presidential debate -- and refused to do so.

Instead of calling out white supremacists, Trump instead said, “Proud Boys, stand back and stand by!”

Here's some of what people were saying about Trump's views on racism:

https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1311133473437085698

https://twitter.com/MichaelEHayden/status/1311133700344737794

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE