Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump and Bolton: Two fat heads with itchy trigger fingers and 120,000 troops

Published

on

US National Security Advisor John Bolton was in Ankara to discuss the planned US withdrawal from Syria. (AFP/File / NICHOLAS KAMM)

Does any of this sound familiar? A body of water called a “gulf” where a ship was “damaged” in an “attack,” and nobody can verify either the attack or the damage. A lying idiot in the White House itching to launch an attack on a regime he hates. A lying national security adviser whispering in the ear of the lying idiot that if we don’t “do something,” our “resolve” will be questioned and we will look “weak.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Here we fucking go again. Gulf of Tonkin? Persian Gulf? The North Vietnamese? The Iranians? What is this, 1964?

This story first appeared at Salon.com.

All we need is a bunch of sold-out politicians in Washington D.C. willing to believe black is white, night is day, and up is down . . . ooops! Who’s that I see over there still talking about Hillary’s emails and Benghazi? Why, it’s any kowtowing Republican walking down one of those corridors in the basement of the Capitol where all the TV reporters shove microphones in their faces so they can blather unhinged nonsense supporting the lies of the man in the White House so he won’t Tweet at them tomorrow morning at 6 a.m., that’s who it is!

What’s that you say? The Iranians are attacking oil tankers in the Persian Gulf and re-starting their nuclear program? John Kerry should be arrested and prosecuted because he talked on the phone to somebody in Iran yesterday? The FBI is a radical leftist cult intent on launching a coup against the president of the United States? Overthrowing Saddam was a really, really good idea, and anybody who doesn’t believe it is a lily-livered peacenik?

How about this number: 120,000 is the number of troops in the “plan” drawn up by the Pentagon to show the Iranians we mean business. What are we going to do with these 120,000 troops? Why, we’re going to send them 6,000 miles away from our shores to the Middle East where they’re going to be ready for . . . something, anyway. We’ll get to that part of the “plan” later. Meanwhile, we’ll dispatch an aircraft carrier group and a passel of B-52’s and probably a whole mess of stealthy submarines, but we’re not supposed to know about the subs, because they’re, like, secret.

ADVERTISEMENT

Isn’t that number just a teeny little bit familiar and just a tad unnerving? Doesn’t it remind you of the number of troops decided upon by those tactical geniuses Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and Douglas Feith, the so-called “architects” of the war in Iraq, because, uh, Saddam had WMD’s and a great big army, but all we needed was about 140,000 troops to go over there and wipe the floor with him and his Ba’athist thugs and be welcomed as “liberators” by the Iraqi people and then we would come home.

Let’s see, that was, uh, 16 years ago, and we still have about 5,200 troops in Iraq, which according to Foreign Policy magazine are facing demands from within the Iraqi parliament to withdraw from the country. We have another thousand or so in Syria, although nobody really knows how many because Trump keeps saying he’s going to withdraw them, but then he doesn’t, presumably because his ear has been tickled by his Chief War-Whisperer, John Bolton.

Sixteen years and something like $3 trillion dollars down the drain, and we’re still in Iraq? That was the war that was going to “pay for itself,” according to strategic genius Paul Wolfowitz, who oversaw the defenestration of the Chief of Staff of the Army, General Eric Shinseki, for having the temerity to disagree with him about troop levels and how much the war would cost in testimony before the Congress. Shinseki, by the way, was proven right. Wolfowitz was proven stupidly, tragically wrong. But who’s back on the op-ed pages, babbling his neo-con nonsense? Wolfowitz, of course, because Americans don’t have the memory of a goddamn gnat, that’s why.

ADVERTISEMENT

Who the fuck are these people? Who were Wolfowitz and Feith, anyway? Who woke up one morning and appointed them as military experts? Feith was fond of giving interviews seated in a big armchair in his personal library of “over 8,000 volumes” of military history. Didn’t the fool bother to read any of them?

Who the hell is Bolton? Who put the hair up his ass so he wants to invade every Muslim country he can find on a map? Didn’t anybody teach that dull bastard to count? Maybe he should drop by Feith’s house and check out a few of his “over 8,000 volumes” of military history.

ADVERTISEMENT

Maybe he’ll discover that Iraq’s population in 2003 was about 25 million, and Iran’s population today is more than twice that, over 81 million. Iraq’s military was on its ass in 2003 when we invaded the country. They retreated so fast, we were in Baghdad in three weeks. Iran’s military has been described as the most powerful in the Middle East other than Israel’s, by no less an expert than former commander of U.S. forces in Iraq General John Abizaid.

We’ve been bogged down in Iraq for 16 years. We spent 10 years in Vietnam spinning our wheels and ending more than 57,000 American lives and God only knows how many Vietnamese lives. How long do you figure we’d be in Iran? How many lives do you think it would cost us? What do you figure gas would cost at the pump about two days after we invaded a major oil-producing country like Iran and disrupted the global oil market?

Is anybody at the fucking White House thinking about this stuff? I mean, look what we’re talking about! We’ve still got troops in Afghanistan 18 years after we invaded that country. We’ve got more than 140 military outposts around the world. We’ve got troops all over the African continent doing who the fuck knows what. We’ve got more than 28,000 troops in South Korea and “no plans” to withdraw them anytime soon, according to Stars and Stripes. We have about 50,000 troops in Japan, backing up our forces in South Korea. We’ve got more than 60,000 troops in Europe, including 35,000 in Germany, 13,000 in Italy, and 10,000 in the United Kingdom.

ADVERTISEMENT

Our military is spread all over the goddamned globe, and Bolton and Trump are sitting around the White House rattling their sabers at Iran? They’re using attacks on ships in the Persian Gulf to justify this madness? A week after Trump appointed Bolton as national security adviser, he pulled us out of the Iran nuclear agreement, and now they’re talking about the Iranian nuclear program when announcing plans to ship 120,000 troops to the Middle East to teach Iran a lesson, or show them who’s boss, or whose mustache is bigger and furrier, or some goddamn thing.

Haven’t we been down this road before? Haven’t we heard these lies and threats and more lies? Haven’t we heard about Pentagon plans and phony estimates and spurious promises? Last time it was Paul “Pay for Itself” Wolfowitz and Condoleezza “Mushroom Cloud” Rice and George “Mission Accomplished” Bush. This time it’s John “War Whisperer” Bolton and Donald “I’m Lying as Fast as I Can” Trump.

We know how this ends: with more dead bodies.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump’s most unhinged supporters paying $5 a pop to use special emojis on YouTube

Published

on

The pro-Trump cable network One America News is cashing in on QAnon conspiracy theorists on its YouTube channel.

OAN viewers can pay $4.95 a month to become "members" of the right-wing channel, which then allows them to use customized emojis to signal their recognition of the conspiracy theory's lore, reported The Daily Beast.

"It’s not clear how many people have signed up for the OAN YouTube membership, when OAN started offering the emojis, or how many of those sign-ups were driven by the opportunity to use QAnon emojis," writes The Beast's Will Sommer. "But the creation of the emojis reflects a decision to monetize, not expel, the conspiracy believers. If QAnon fans are going to spam QAnon in the OAN comments, it seems the network has decided they might as well get some money out of it."

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Former federal prosecutor explains how AG Barr could help Trump steal the election — and take the US to ‘a very dark place’

Published

on

Between the coronavirus pandemic, civil unrest in major U.S. cities, huge anti-racism protests, bitter political divisions, a heated Supreme Court battle and President Donald Trump’s ruthless voter suppression efforts, the United States’ 2020 presidential election is turning out to be even more chaotic than the elections of 2000 and 1968. Trump has a devoted loyalist in U.S. Attorney General William Barr, and former federal prosecutor Barbara McQuade discusses the effect he could have on the 2020 election in a disturbing op-ed published in the Washington Post on September 22.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

You’d think Mitch McConnell would use RBG’s open seat to drive election turnout — but he has a different goal in mind

Published

on

President Trump repeatedly says that he's accomplished more than any president in history. I've never heard anyone ask him to lay out specifically what he means by that. He can try to take credit for signing big tax cuts for the wealthy, but that was passed by the Republican Congress with little input from him. It's true that his executive branch agencies have overturned many environmental rules and other regulations, but he hasn't been involved and clearly doesn't know the details.Trump's corruption has given his consigliere, Attorney General Bill Barr, the opportunity to further his own "powerful executive" theory. His craven pandering to white supremacists and the evangelical right has kept the base bonded tightly to the Republican Party. But beyond that his list of accomplishments is nil. He has literally done nothing but run his mouth and turn the U.S. into an object of fear and pity around the world
Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE