“Schumer is as much responsible for this as Pelosi… it’s appalling.”
“I am looking for a new pharmaceutical drug that builds spines.”
That was Rep. Pramila Jayapal’s (D-Wash.) reaction on Thursday after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi capitulated to Republicans and so-called moderate Democrats by agreeing to pass a $4.6 billion Senate border aid package that contains virtually no protections for immigrant children detained by the Trump administration.
“Skating under the radar are Schumer and Senate Democrats, who deserve just as much blame for their spinelessness, who gifted McConnell his leverage.”
—Alexander McCoy, Common Defense
While Jayapal and other progressives were quick to note that Pelosi deserves criticism for approving the Senate legislation—which was strongly opposed by the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and immigrant rights groups—they argued Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) should share the blame for failing to whip his caucus against the measure.
On Wednesday, the Senate passed the $4.6 billion Republican border bill by an 84-8 margin. Thirty-three Democrats—including Schumer—voted yes, handing Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) an easy victory.
Progressive Democrats said Schumer’s failure to fight the Republican legislation left the House with no leverage to negotiate stronger protections for migrant children, who are currently enduring horrific conditions in Border Patrol detention facilities in Texas and elsewhere.
After Pelosi announced Thursday that she would “reluctantly” support passage of the GOP Senate bill despite progressive outrage, the legislation sailed through the House Thursday evening with the backing of 129 Democrats.
“Listen,” Jayapal told reporters, “I think Leader Schumer and all the Senate Democrats have to understand that we need them to stand up and oppose.”
Jayapal also slammed Pelosi’s decision to give in to McConnell and so-called “moderate” Democrats an interview with Politico, saying: “We can’t say that we have a lawless administration or a president who should be in prison, or whatever people want to say about him, but then cave. You have to fight for what you believe.”
When Senate Democrats overwhelmingly vote with Mitch McConnell for a bill that has no provisions to make sure children get the care they need, then yes, I will call them out. With an 84-8 vote in the Senate, it gives us no room in the House to push for the accountability we need. https://t.co/bpwxZKSFbW
— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@RepJayapal) June 27, 2019
Jayapal’s anger at the Democratic leadership for refusing to fight the Senate bill was echoed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who said Pelosi’s decision to capitulate to McConnell was an unacceptable “abdication of power” that will give the Trump administration a blank check to continue harming children at the border.
“The problem right now and the question at hand is Mitch McConnell sent us a bill and we’re putting a big checkmark on it instead of even trying to negotiate,” Ocasio-Cortez, who opposed all new funding for Trump’s deportation force, said during an interview on CNN. “What Mitch McConnell is doing is that he’s relying on the time pressure of [July 4] recess to try to ram through a bill that is completely irresponsible.”
.@AOC on House moving to pass Senate border bill: “The problem right now and the question at hand is Mitch McConnell sent us a bill & we’re putting a big checkmark on it instead of even trying to negotiate…what Mitch McConnell is doing is relying on the time pressure of recess” pic.twitter.com/jBPvlCSMge
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 27, 2019
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) also spoke out against the passage of the package and said the funding bill was a wasted opportunity to help children who remain in dire need:
Nothing we did today will make sure that kids will have a proper place to sleep.
Nothing we did today will make sure kids aren’t kept in cages.
We had an opportunity to address a humanitarian crisis and we wasted it. pic.twitter.com/OVoVf5SbSc
— Rep. Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan) June 27, 2019
As the New York Times reported Thursday, Pelosi’s decision to approve the Senate bill came after she received “private assurances” from Vice President Mike Pence that the Trump administration would “abide by some of the restrictions she had sought.”
“They included a requirement to notify lawmakers within 24 hours after the death of a migrant child in government custody, and a 90-day time limit on children spending time in temporary intake facilities,” the Times reported, citing a person familiar with the discussions.
The “restrictions” Pelosi reportedly pushed for amounted to less than the protections Jayapal sought in House negotiations over the border aid package.
In a statement on Thursday, Jayapal said she pushed for “strong guard rails to specify that children should get food, water, medical care and legal services; that no child should be kept in these facilities for more than 90 days; and that private, for-profit contractors who violate these standards would have their contracts terminated.”
Pelosi’s private negotiation with Pence, which ended with no binding restrictions, sparked fury on social media.
“Schumer is as much responsible for this as Pelosi but, yes, it’s appalling,” tweeted The Nation‘s Jeet Heer.
— Eli Valley (@elivalley) June 27, 2019
Alexander McCoy, political director for anti-war group Common Defense, noted on Twitter that Pelosi is deservedly “getting a lot of the flak” for allowing Republicans to ram through legislation that was strongly opposed by immigrant rights groups and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.
“Nothing excuses writing a blank check for concentration camps,” McCoy wrote.
“But,” McCoy added, “skating under the radar are Schumer and Senate Democrats, who deserve just as much blame for their spinelessness, who gifted McConnell his leverage.”
Chelsea Clinton accidentally scorches Meghan McCain while dismissing congressional rumors on The View
Chelsea Clinton dismissed the rumors that she's considering a run for Congress -- while taking a subtle swipe at fellow political daughter Meghan McCain.
Clinton filled in Wednesday as co-host on "The View" for Joy Behar, who's been out all week, and was asked right away to comment on rumors that she might run for the House seat vacated by the retiring Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY).
"I understand why people are asking, and someone has asked me some version of this question for literally as long as I can remember," Clinton said.
‘Not true’: Fox News calls out Trump for lying about keeping US soldiers out of harm’s way
As the U.S. military grapples with the logistics of a quick withdrawal from the northern part of Syria, President Donald Trump drew criticism for abandoning the Kurds and endangering U.S. troops. There are also reports that the army's departure has resulted in members of ISIS escaping from prison.
On Wednesday, Trump defended his decision, insisting that U.S. soldiers were not in danger. "Our soldiers are not in harm's way," he said. “That has nothing to do with us,” he added, about the conflict between Turkey and the Kurds at the Turkish-Syrian border.
But top military officials told Fox News that this was not true. "Not true, according to top US military commanders who tell Fox this is a complicated, deliberate phased withdrawal with a lot of inherent risk," Jennifer Griffin, National Security correspondent for Fox News, wrote on Twitter. "Already US warplanes had to warn approaching foreign troops with a show of force."
‘Worse than Obama’: Lindsey Graham has full-blown freak out over Trump’s latest Syria statements
Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on Wednesday had a full-blown freak out after President Donald Trump publicly said that the Turkish slaughter of the Kurds in northern Syria was not America's problem.
Writing on Twitter, the senator had his harshest condemnation yet of the president's decision to abruptly pull American troops out of Syria while giving Turkey a green light to invade the area.
"I hope President Trump is right in his belief that Turkeys invasion of Syria is of no concern to us, abandoning the Kurds won’t come back to haunt us, ISIS won’t reemerge, and Iran will not fill the vacuum created by this decision," Graham wrote. "However, I firmly believe that if President Trump continues to make such statements this will be a disaster worse than President Obama’s decision to leave Iraq."