“Schumer is as much responsible for this as Pelosi… it’s appalling.”
“I am looking for a new pharmaceutical drug that builds spines.”
That was Rep. Pramila Jayapal’s (D-Wash.) reaction on Thursday after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi capitulated to Republicans and so-called moderate Democrats by agreeing to pass a $4.6 billion Senate border aid package that contains virtually no protections for immigrant children detained by the Trump administration.
“Skating under the radar are Schumer and Senate Democrats, who deserve just as much blame for their spinelessness, who gifted McConnell his leverage.”
—Alexander McCoy, Common Defense
While Jayapal and other progressives were quick to note that Pelosi deserves criticism for approving the Senate legislation—which was strongly opposed by the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and immigrant rights groups—they argued Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) should share the blame for failing to whip his caucus against the measure.
On Wednesday, the Senate passed the $4.6 billion Republican border bill by an 84-8 margin. Thirty-three Democrats—including Schumer—voted yes, handing Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) an easy victory.
Progressive Democrats said Schumer’s failure to fight the Republican legislation left the House with no leverage to negotiate stronger protections for migrant children, who are currently enduring horrific conditions in Border Patrol detention facilities in Texas and elsewhere.
After Pelosi announced Thursday that she would “reluctantly” support passage of the GOP Senate bill despite progressive outrage, the legislation sailed through the House Thursday evening with the backing of 129 Democrats.
“Listen,” Jayapal told reporters, “I think Leader Schumer and all the Senate Democrats have to understand that we need them to stand up and oppose.”
Jayapal also slammed Pelosi’s decision to give in to McConnell and so-called “moderate” Democrats an interview with Politico, saying: “We can’t say that we have a lawless administration or a president who should be in prison, or whatever people want to say about him, but then cave. You have to fight for what you believe.”
When Senate Democrats overwhelmingly vote with Mitch McConnell for a bill that has no provisions to make sure children get the care they need, then yes, I will call them out. With an 84-8 vote in the Senate, it gives us no room in the House to push for the accountability we need. https://t.co/bpwxZKSFbW
— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@RepJayapal) June 27, 2019
Jayapal’s anger at the Democratic leadership for refusing to fight the Senate bill was echoed by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), who said Pelosi’s decision to capitulate to McConnell was an unacceptable “abdication of power” that will give the Trump administration a blank check to continue harming children at the border.
“The problem right now and the question at hand is Mitch McConnell sent us a bill and we’re putting a big checkmark on it instead of even trying to negotiate,” Ocasio-Cortez, who opposed all new funding for Trump’s deportation force, said during an interview on CNN. “What Mitch McConnell is doing is that he’s relying on the time pressure of [July 4] recess to try to ram through a bill that is completely irresponsible.”
.@AOC on House moving to pass Senate border bill: “The problem right now and the question at hand is Mitch McConnell sent us a bill & we’re putting a big checkmark on it instead of even trying to negotiate…what Mitch McConnell is doing is relying on the time pressure of recess” pic.twitter.com/jBPvlCSMge
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 27, 2019
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) also spoke out against the passage of the package and said the funding bill was a wasted opportunity to help children who remain in dire need:
Nothing we did today will make sure that kids will have a proper place to sleep.
Nothing we did today will make sure kids aren’t kept in cages.
We had an opportunity to address a humanitarian crisis and we wasted it. pic.twitter.com/OVoVf5SbSc
— Rep. Ilhan Omar (@Ilhan) June 27, 2019
As the New York Times reported Thursday, Pelosi’s decision to approve the Senate bill came after she received “private assurances” from Vice President Mike Pence that the Trump administration would “abide by some of the restrictions she had sought.”
“They included a requirement to notify lawmakers within 24 hours after the death of a migrant child in government custody, and a 90-day time limit on children spending time in temporary intake facilities,” the Times reported, citing a person familiar with the discussions.
The “restrictions” Pelosi reportedly pushed for amounted to less than the protections Jayapal sought in House negotiations over the border aid package.
In a statement on Thursday, Jayapal said she pushed for “strong guard rails to specify that children should get food, water, medical care and legal services; that no child should be kept in these facilities for more than 90 days; and that private, for-profit contractors who violate these standards would have their contracts terminated.”
Pelosi’s private negotiation with Pence, which ended with no binding restrictions, sparked fury on social media.
“Schumer is as much responsible for this as Pelosi but, yes, it’s appalling,” tweeted The Nation‘s Jeet Heer.
— Eli Valley (@elivalley) June 27, 2019
Alexander McCoy, political director for anti-war group Common Defense, noted on Twitter that Pelosi is deservedly “getting a lot of the flak” for allowing Republicans to ram through legislation that was strongly opposed by immigrant rights groups and the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.
“Nothing excuses writing a blank check for concentration camps,” McCoy wrote.
“But,” McCoy added, “skating under the radar are Schumer and Senate Democrats, who deserve just as much blame for their spinelessness, who gifted McConnell his leverage.”
WATCH: Protesters celebrate as Chase Bank was set ablaze during Portland protests
Trump alerts ‘active-duty U.S. military police’ for possible deployment to Minnesota: report
President Donald Trump's administration is contemplating using active-duty U.S. troops in an attempt to quell the protests in Minneapolis, the Associated Press reported early Saturday morning.
As unrest spread across dozens of American cities on Friday, the Pentagon took the rare step of ordering the Army to put several active-duty U.S. military police units on the ready to deploy to Minneapolis, where the police killing of George Floyd sparked the widespread protests," the AP reported.
"Soldiers from Fort Bragg in North Carolina and Fort Drum in New York have been ordered to be ready to deploy within four hours if called, according to three people with direct knowledge of the orders. Soldiers in Fort Carson, in Colorado, and Fort Riley in Kansas have been told to be ready within 24 hours. The people did not want their names used because they were not authorized to discuss the preparations," the AP explained.
John Roberts joins liberals as Supreme Court rejects challenge to Newsom’s COVID-19 limits on California church attendance
In a 5-4 ruling, the Supreme Court on Friday rejected an emergency appeal from the South Bay United Pentecostal Church in Chula Vista, California. The San Diego area church tried to challenge the state's limits on attendance at worship services:
The church argued that limits on how many people can attend their services violate constitutional guarantees of religious freedom and had been seeking an order in time for services on Sunday. The church said it has crowds of 200 to 300 people for its services.