Quantcast
Connect with us

Former federal prosecutor explains why a case he tried proves Jeffrey Epstein’s legal defense won’t fly

Published

on

Former federal and state prosecutor Elie Honig worked in the Southern District of New York where accused child molester Jeffrey Epstein is currently being charged. But he has some disagreements with the way the prosecutors and defense are painting the case.

In his weekly segment explaining the legal side of key cases in the news, Honig said that he disagrees with the prosecutors saying that Americans shouldn’t read too much into the case being out of the political corruption division.

ADVERTISEMENT

“All due respect to my former office, yes, attach significance to that,” he said. “It’s very unusual. This case ordinarily would be staffed out of the human trafficking unit which I used to supervise in the organized crime unit. The fact that public corruption is on it tells me there is at least one current or past public official involved in this case, somehow or other.”

The other comment he disputed came from the defense team, which intends to argue that Epstein can’t be tried a second time for the same crime. Honig explained that Epstein’s team has no shot at making the argument stick.

“Double jeopardy is not going to work,” he began. “He was never prosecuted formally in Florida. That went to the state. Now he’s being charged federally. We just got a Supreme Court decision two weeks ago that says that is not double jeopardy. Someone can be charged in the state, then federal. No problem.”

He said that the defense will likely argue that the deal thay got from former prosecutor Alex Acosta “covers them,” but that has already been decided by higher courts too.

“The Southern District of New York has already anticipated this, if you look at their first brief,” Honig continued. “They cite a case that happened to be mine — a mafia murder case that I tried and argued on appeal where this guy got a sweetheart deal from a different district. We took a look at it, charged it correctly and the court of appeals, here in New York said, ‘That’s okay.’ The sweetheart plea deal he got before does not bind another federal district.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch his full take below:

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘They’re crushing us’: GOP House leaders in panic over Democratic fundraising

Published

on

On Tuesday, Politico's Jake Sherman reported that House GOP leadership expressed serious alarm about their prospects for reclaiming the majority in a closed-door strategy meeting at the Capitol Hill Club, citing disastrous fundraising numbers at the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC).

"They're kicking our ass," said House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who noted that the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) has outraised them by $40 million, and several individual Democratic House challengers are outraising GOP incumbents — not only dimming their hopes of taking back the House, but raising the possibility they could lose even more seats.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Trump-loving GOP candidate faces more trouble as his Ukraine ranting provokes a defamation suit

Published

on

A pro-Trump aspiring politician who was named in documents released by an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani is being sued by a Dutch Trump supporter for defamation, the Hartford Courant reports.

Robert F. Hyde reportedly made the alleged defamatory comments during an interview with a local news station, where he discussed the documents alleging he was involved in some sort of surveillance operation of Marie Yovanovitch, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. WhatsApp messages appeared to show that Hyde was sending updates on Yovanovitch's whereabouts to Lev Parnas, a former associate of Giuliani who is now under indictment for campaign finance violations.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

BUSTED: These 10 GOP senators said Ukraine quid pro quo was a red line before Bolton bombshell

Published

on

The Washington Post's Philip Bump has tracked down statements from ten different Republican senators who in the past indicated that impeachment charges against President Donald Trump would be far more serious if it could be proven there was a quid-pro-quo agreement that involved exchanging the release of foreign aid to Ukraine for the investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden.

All of the statements flagged by Bump came before this week's bombshell revelation that former national security adviser John Bolton's upcoming book will reportedly say the president directly linked Ukraine aid to the Biden investigation.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image