Quantcast
Connect with us

The media got it wrong: There’s no evidence GOP support for Trump improved after his racist outburst

Published

on

- Commentary

One of the most popular articles last week involved claims that polls showed Republicans had increased their support of President Trump.  But a closer analysis of the data reveals that any increase in support was within the margin of error.  So the polls couldn’t conclude that GOP support for President Trump had gone up or down.

Polls are tricky creatures.  We either give them near god-like status, or discount them entirely, often depending on whether they show us what we want.

ADVERTISEMENT

I remember the movie “Machete,” where an opportunistic Texas politician fakes his own shooting.  Within five minutes of that story breaking, the news anchor reported that the politician had drastically improved his standing in the polls.  Surveys don’t work that way.

Critics claim polls “got it wrong” in 2016.  Actually, they were very accurate at picking the popular vote that year, which doesn’t decide the election, because they ran so many surveys of Americans across the country.  They rarely surveyed several battleground states like Wisconsin that Democrats traditionally win.  They asked the wrong questions.

When news organizations touted that “President Donald Trump’s approval rating with Republicans rose in a poll taken after his racist tweets on Sunday attacking four Democratic congresswomen of color,” I decided to investigate.  These stories claim that Trump’s approval ratings “rose 5 percentage points to 72% from a similar poll conducted last week.”

So I looked at the Reuters polls from July 10 and July 17.  On July 10, 53% of Republican Registered Voters strongly approved of the president, with 28% of these GOP voters “somewhat approving” of President Trump, with 2% of GOPers leaning towards approval.

ADVERTISEMENT

On July 17, 52% of Republican voters strongly approved the president, with 32% of the GOP somewhat approving, and 2% of Republicans leaning towards approval.

That means the president’s doing better with Republicans in the polls than what was reported in these articles.  If he were at 72%, going up five points, he’d be around Jimmy Carter’s level with the Democrats in 1980, which contributed to the president’s landslide loss.

But that “net approval” was only three points (from 83% to 86%), well within the 5.6% margin of error in the Reuters/Ipsos polls.  Go look it up, and see for yourself.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump’s approval rating fell dramatically with Democrats and Independents.  However, those were in the margins of error too.  As the 538.org pollsters would say “It’s a bad use of polling.”

Additionally, Republicans from elected officials to key advisers worked overtime begging Trump to walk back the comments, or at least soften the tone.  While most were leery of criticizing Trump directly, they did call the words a mistake or regrettable, as reported by numerous sites.  That’s not what you do if those tweets are being well received by Republicans. President Trump’s approval ratings are also well below 50% in both Reuters/Ipsos polls.

At a minimum, we cannot conclude at the writing of this article that Republicans are more likely to support President Trump after those tweets, or are less likely to do so.  But what we can conclude is that our polling is not what’s incorrect, but often our analysis of it.

ADVERTISEMENT

John A. Tures is a professor of political science at LaGrange College in LaGrange, Georgia.  He can be reached at [email protected]. His Twitter account is JohnTures2.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and legal efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. And unlike other news outlets, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from billionaires and corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click to donate by check.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. Like you, we here at Raw Story believe in the power of progressive journalism — and we’re investing in investigative reporting as other publications give it the ax. Raw Story readers power David Cay Johnston’s DCReport, which we've expanded to keep watch in Washington. We’ve exposed billionaire tax evasion and uncovered White House efforts to poison our water. We’ve revealed financial scams that prey on veterans, and efforts to harm workers exploited by abusive bosses. We’ve launched a weekly podcast, “We’ve Got Issues,” focused on issues, not tweets. Unlike other news sites, we’ve decided to make our original content free. But we need your support to do what we do.

Raw Story is independent. You won’t find mainstream media bias here. We’re not part of a conglomerate, or a project of venture capital bros. From unflinching coverage of racism, to revealing efforts to erode our rights, Raw Story will continue to expose hypocrisy and harm. Unhinged from corporate overlords, we fight to ensure no one is forgotten.

We need your support to keep producing quality journalism and deepen our investigative reporting. Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Invest with us in the future. Make a one-time contribution to Raw Story Investigates, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.



Report typos and corrections to: [email protected]. Send news tips to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Commentary

Here are 11 things the Koch brothers didn’t want you to know

Published

on

The mega-billionaire brothers, David and Charles Koch, stand apart in the world of Republicans.

This story first ran in May of 2014. 

In 2012, their network of hardcore libertarian political donors spent $400 million on negative campaign ads intended to destroy government safety nets and defeat Democrats. They want to repeal Obamacare, dismantle labor unions, repeal any environmental law protecting clean water and air, roll back voting rights, privatize Social Security, stop a minimum wage increase and more. They don’t care about destroying the checks and balances in American democracy to get their way.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Whistleblower hands House Dems evidence of ‘inappropriate’ interference on Trump’s tax returns

Published

on

A federal employee turned over “credible” evidence to House Democrats of possible “inappropriate efforts to influence” the IRS presidential audit process, House lawyers said in a court filing Tuesday.

In July, House Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal, D-Mass., sued Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin after the latter rejected the panel’s request for six years of Trump’s tax returns. On Tuesday, House lawyers cited the new evidence in a motion asking a federal judge to rule without trial that the Treasury Department is required by law to turn over the president’s tax returns.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Trump officials to face congressional grilling over president’s link to white nationalist terrorism

Published

on

Next week, Democrats on the House Oversight Committee are poised to question members of the Trump administration about the dangerous rise in white nationalist violence.

Just last weekend, a man slaughtered dozens of people in El Paso, Texas, after citing an "invasion" on the Southwest border.

In addition to questioning senior national security officials about the rise in white nationalism violence, they also plan to ask them whether they think President Donald Trump is instigating violent acts with his rhetoric, reports Greg Sargent in the Washington Post.

Continue Reading
 
 

Thank you for whitelisting Raw Story!

As a special thank you, from now until August 31st, we're offering you a discounted rate of $5.99/month to subscribe and get ad-free access. We're honored to have you as a reader. Thank you. :) —Elias, Membership Coordinator
LEARN MORE
close-link
close-image