Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump’s China tariffs won’t even pay for the bailout to farmers hurt by his trade war

Published

on

The revenues raised by President Trump’s tariffs on China are not even enough to cover the cost of bailing out farmers hit hardest by his trade war.

“We’ve taken in tens of billions of dollars in tariffs from China,” Trump told reporters Monday. He previously vowed that he would raise so much money from the tariffs that it would eliminate the entire national debt. But the New York Times reports that Customs and Border Protection data shows that the tariffs have raised about $20.8 billion in revenue. That is far less than the $28 billion in bailout funds that Trump vowed to give farmers after China imposed steep retaliatory tariffs targeting the agriculture industry. So far the administration has not offered any bailouts to other industries that have suffered sharp revenue losses in the ongoing trade war.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s also false to claim that revenue from the tariffs comes “from China,” since it is paid by American consumers. According to a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Columbia and Princeton Universities, Trump’s tariffs “were almost completely passed through into U.S. domestic prices, so that the entire incidence of the tariffs fell on domestic consumers” with “no impact” on foreign exporters.

While American industries have seen falling profits and consumers have been forced to pay higher prices for countless products, the tariffs have certainly hit China as well, causing growth to fall to its lowest level in nearly three decades. Trump bragged about companies leaving China because of his tariffs on Monday.

“The United States Tariffs are having a major effect on companies wanting to leave China for non-tariffed countries,” Trump tweeted. “Thousands of companies are leaving.”

This is true, but despite Trump’s claims that the tariffs would cause companies to move manufacturing to the U.S., there is little evidence of that. Instead, The Wall Street Journal reports, U.S. manufacturers are simply moving their production to nearby Asian countries that haven’t been hit with Trump’s tariffs.

Apple is considering moving some of its assembly plants out of China, according to the report, and the makers of products like GoPro cameras, Crocs shoes, Roomba vacuum cleaners, Yeti beer coolers and Lovesac furniture have already done so. Instead of moving to the U.S., however, the companies moved their production to Vietnam, as well as India, Taiwan and Malaysia.

ADVERTISEMENT

Imports from Vietnam are up 36 percent this year while imports from China are down 12 percent, according to the Journal, but there’s been no positive movement in the U.S. as manufacturing has fallen to the lowest level of Trump’s presidency.

As a result of companies moving production out of China, the tariff revenues Trump bragged about have also fallen. Trump claimed as a candidate that he would eliminate not just the federal deficit but the entire $22 trillion national debt “over a period of eight years” by imposing tariffs and renegotiating trade deals. Amid stalled trade talks with China, the White House released a report this week projecting that the deficit will hit $1 trillion this fiscal year. That’s the largest deficit since the Great Recession and the second-highest in U.S. history.

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

I thought Democrats were making a giant mistake on impeachment — but these experts changed my mind

Published

on

On Tuesday, Democratic leaders in the House of Representatives announced that they would move forward with two articles of impeachment — involving abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — against President Donald Trump.

At first, I shared the frustration of many liberals and progressives that these articles are too limited in scope, and leave a great many of Trump’s apparent misdeeds unmentioned. But further reflection and exchanges with legal experts have convinced me that appearance is misleading. In fact, Democrats have performed a deft feat. In a single stroke — OK, two strokes — they have elevated the process of holding Trump accountable above the realm of partisan politics, and have also given the Democratic nominee (whoever that is) an excellent case to use against Trump in next year’s presidential election. The challenge for Democrats going forward will be to keep that nonpartisan outlook in mind — while understanding that, ultimately and unfortunately, the only possible way to hold Trump accountable will be through partisan politics.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump supporters cry bitter tears after Greta Thunberg named Time Person of the Year

Published

on

Climate activist Greta Thunberg has been named Time Magazine's Person of the Year -- and Trump supporters are deeply unhappy about it.

Thunberg, whose advocacy for real action on climate change has drawn rebukes from conservative political figures including President Donald Trump and Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, was described by Time in its profile as delivering "a simple truth in a fateful moment" in the debate over how to reduce greenhouse emissions and prevent catastrophic environmental damage.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

The ‘War on Christmas’ was started more than 500 years ago — by Christians

Published

on

If it feels like the “War on Christmas” is getting really old, it is. Almost 15 years have passed since Bill O’Reilly first opened December with a segment called, “Christmas Under Siege”—ten long years in which his cadences and refrains and echoing chorus have become as familiar to most Americans as Handel’s Messiah. More familiar, in fact.

Not that O’Reilly invented the idea. During the 1920’s, Henry Ford’s newspaper published a series of anti-Semitic articles titled, “The International Jew: The World’s Foremost Problem.” Among the complaints:

Continue Reading