Connect with us

California governor signs law making gig workers employees



California Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation Wednesday which could slam the brakes on the so-called “gig economy” by requiring rideshare firms to treat contract drivers as employees, challenging the economic models of giants such as Uber and Lyft.

The legislation, which is being closely watched in other states, responds to critics who argue that rideshare firms shortchange contract drivers by denying them employee benefits.


The new law comes with growing numbers of workers relying on short-term “gigs” which offer greater flexibility but lack the benefits of regular employment.

The governor called the measure known as AB5 “landmark legislation for workers and our economy” and said it would reduce “worker misclassification” that denied benefits such as minimum wage, sick leave and health insurance.

“The hollowing out of our middle class has been 40 years in the making and the need to create lasting economic security for our workforce demands action. Assembly Bill 5 is an important step.”

The law challenges the business model of the rideshare platforms and others which depend on workers taking on “gigs” as independent contractors.

The measure was hailed as a watershed moment for labor activists seeking more rights for gig and freelance workers.


“Big thank you to all the gig workers, union members & activists who spent countless hours rallying to deliver this historic win,” the California Labor Federal said in a tweet.

GETTY IMAGES/AFP/File / JUSTIN SULLIVAN California Gov. Gavin Newsom said a law he signed requiring rideshare firms to treat drivers as employees would be a step toward “creating lasting economic security”

State assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, author of AB5, lauded its signing as a “massive win” for workers.

“I’m proud to have had a small part in redefining labor law in this state and starting a path to reducing income inequality and rebuilding the middle class.”


But the state’s Republican Caucus fired off a tweet contending that Newsom signed “California’s largest anti-free market legislation” and that it could effect some two million jobs.

– Referendum sought –


GETTY IMAGES/AFP/File / SCOTT OLSON Uber and Lyft have said that reclassifying their drivers as employees poses risks to their business models

Uber and Lyft, whose business models may be jeopardized by the law, said they would press on for a referendum that would overturn the measure, asking voters to approve a new system for independent workers with benefits.

The rideshare rivals said they have set aside $30 million each to support a ballot initiative next year.

“We’ve been proudly advocating for a new progressive framework that would for the first time give minimum earnings guarantees, access to benefits, and a right to organize to independent workers,” an Uber spokesman said.


“We believe California is missing a real opportunity to lead the nation by improving the quality, security and dignity of independent work.”

The two firms are seeking a new classification that considers workers independent while guaranteeing benefits and enabling collective bargaining.

Lyft policy communications director Adrian Durbin said the firms would seek a referendum if there is no negotiated deal with the governor.

“We are confident that with his leadership we can reach a historic agreement, but if necessary we are prepared to take this issue to the voters to preserve the freedom and access drivers and passengers want,” Durbin said.


GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA/AFP/File / Drew Angerer As California debated legislation on rules for rideshare drivers, activists in New York rallied on Septmebr 10 for wage enforcement and a drivers’ bill of rights

Uber has said it has no plans to immediately reclassify drivers as employees in January, when the law takes effect.

The law “does not provide drivers benefits; give them the right to organize, or classify them as employees,” Uber chief legal officer Tony West said on a call last week with reporters.

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
Continue Reading


Trump unleashes yet another maddening scandal as he opens the door to Saudi Arabian interference



I don’t often talk about how mad I am. I don’t often talk about how mad I am, because talking often about how mad I am prevents me from speaking clearly and rationally. I want to speak clearly and rationally. There is so much need for speaking clearly and rationally amid the endless streams of waste and filth polluting our public discourse.

This article was originally published at The Editorial Board

But I can’t speak clearly and rationally at the expense of morality. Morality often begins with a feeling. The Gospels tell us of Jesus looking on the poor—he could hear and smell their misery—and he was “moved with pity.” But another way of putting it, another way of translating ?????????????, is that the rabbi felt compassion “in his guts.

Continue Reading


US Supreme Court lets stand Kentucky law with abortion restrictions



The US Supreme Court on Monday let stand a Kentucky law that requires doctors to make patients seeking an abortion look at fetal images taken by echocardiogram and to listen to their heartbeat.

Without explanation, as is customary, the top US court refused to hear a suit challenging the state law, which was passed in 2017.

The law requires doctors to show patients echocardiogram images of the fetus and describe to them its size and organs and have them listen to its heartbeat if it is detectable, even if the patient objects.

Kentucky's authorities justified the measure as needed to obtain the patient's "informed consent" before proceeding with an abortion.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Chris Wallace shreds Ken Starr: Trump’s scandal ‘a much bigger issue than whether Bill Clinton lied about sex’



Fox News host Chris Wallace argued that the deeds President Donald Trump is accused of are more serious to the country than President Bill Clinton's actions, who was impeached for lying about sex.

During a break in impeachment hearings on Monday, Wallace called out Ken Starr's "characterization of this process and what we heard today... he said that the presentation against the president is narrow, prosecutors look through the world through dirty windows, it's slanted."

"And you know, it just seems to me -- and Ken, I see you there on the screen so I'll be talking directly to you -- when you compare this to the Clinton impeachment, which was basically about whether the president had lied under oath about sex," Wallace continued. "I'm not talking about whether this story is true or not."

Continue Reading