Quantcast
Connect with us

Is a strange Twitter glitch censoring the left?

Published

on

- Commentary

The Working Families Party, a New York-based progressive political party, has a reputation befitting its name as a left-populist political organization. So when the organization endorsed the center-left Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren — who was once a hardcore Republican and has emphasized her capitalist credentials — over the explicitly democratic socialist candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sanders (I-Vt.) supporters were understandably disappointed. After all, the party overwhelmingly endorsed Sanders in the previous presidential election. What had changed?

ADVERTISEMENT

This article first appeared in Salon.

It turns out that the organization isn’t telling.

That’s because the Working Families Party (WFP) voting process was not fully democratic, by a sort of hybridized process: part of the vote to endorse came from members itself. The other part came from the leadership.

The WFP is not releasing the tallies of either the leadership vote, nor the membership vote, nor is it releasing how they were weighted. (WFP members voted overwhelmingly to endorse Sanders in 2016, with 87.5% of members voting to endorse him.)

That suggests that the WFP is hiding something. Many Sanders supporters agreed, and went to vent on the only public forum that functionally exists anymore: Twitter.

ADVERTISEMENT

But on the Working Families Party’s Twitter thread announcing the vote, many found something bizarre: they couldn’t actually comment on, “like,” or see other comments on the thread.

“I can’t see the comments or reply to the Working Families Party tweet,” Kaitlin Sopoci-Belknap, the National Director of Move to Amend, who is personally supporting Sanders, told Salon. “I was never able to, I got the text from them and went to Twitter from there, but I couldn’t see the comments.”

This wasn’t an isolated experience; one enterprising Twitter user even began documenting the cases of people who were unable to reply to the thread, and quickly amassed dozens of screenshots of what was termed “The Left Twitter Blackout.”

ADVERTISEMENT

For Sopoci-Belknap, the inability to reply was accompanied by an error message: “Twitter is over capacity. Please wait a few moments then try again.” Others, as seen in the screenshot thread, received a “Failed to load tweet,” message.

That raised a curious question: was Twitter, or the WFP account, or both, somehow censoring people who were angry and wanted to reply — blocking their ability to do so with an error message?

ADVERTISEMENT

Interestingly, this glitch — or feature — wasn’t limited to one WFP tweet.

Salon’s Executive Editor Andrew O’Hehir noticed he could not “like” an Edward Snowden thread on Tuesday about Snowden’s book; he, too received a “like failed” message, and found that the Snowden post behaved similarly to the WFP post, in that he was unable to interact with it.

John Graziano, who has over 18,000 followers on Twitter, and often tweets on left-wing politics, said he noticed the pattern about a month ago: certain prominent tweets would get a lot of attention, yet he could not view the replies.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I just figured because a lot of them were heavily ratioed, and had over 1,000 replies, that too many replies means it shuts down,” Graziano told Salon.

Being “ratioed” is Twitter slang for having negative replies outweigh positive interactions; a “ratioed” tweet is dominated by replies, with few likes and retweets. Some see it as a gauge for a bad post.

While some have speculated the Twitter phenomenon could merely be a glitch, Graziano, who has worked in tech for decades, said this would be a pretty big bug for Twitter to let go unfixed for over a month.

Twitter has been mum on the topic; two requests for comments were not returned in the last 24 hours.

ADVERTISEMENT

One mundane but incomplete explanation is that this phenomenon could be related to Twitter’s “Hide Replies” feature, which allows users to remove their comments from others’ view. The “Hide Replies” feature gives the user who started a conversation the option to hide replies to their tweets. The hidden replies are viewable by others through a menu option.

However, in the case of the WFP and other tweets, some users are being blocked from replying to begin with — which suggests the two situations may not be related.

The nature of online forum communications, and censorship of such, is of national significance inasmuch as the idea of a public forum has been recently consigned to the private sphere, controlled by tech megaliths like Twitter and Facebook. These tech corporations’ oft-arbitrary decisions about rules of public communication have vast implications for public discourse. In general, their rules almost always protect the powerful.

For progressives who were incensed at the WFP’s decision, and unable to comment, the phenomenon fit a common pattern of left-progressives being shut out of the public conversation. Whether a conspiracy or imagined, vocal Twitter leftists saw it as a provocation.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When I go to my non-political account, for a nonprofit I work for, I can see all of the [replies] — and the difference is that account is not in anyway identified with me, and it never participates in political discussions because [it] explicitly has nothing to do with electoral politics,” Graziano said.

“What we have seen is all of these establishments, media and social media sites, doing things that try to inhibit the formation of a community,” he added.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Unprecedented and inappropriate’: Former IG slams Bill Barr’s investigator for attack on FBI

Published

on

From the outset, Attorney General William Barr attacked the findings of Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz debunking GOP conspiracy theories about the FBI "spying" on President Donald Trump's 2016 campaign. But he was also joined by U.S. Attorney John Durham, a longtime career official in the Justice Department whom Barr had tapped to run a parallel investigation — even though Durham, according to recent reports, cannot find criminal misconduct to charge.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

WATCH LIVE: Democrats to unveil historic articles of impeachment against Donald Trump

Published

on

On Tuesday morning members of the Democratic-led House of Representatives will release the articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump.

According to the Associated Press, "House Democrats are poised to unveil two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump — abuse of power and obstruction of Congress — with an announcement expected early Tuesday. Democratic leaders are pushing ahead with formal charges saying the president put U.S. elections and national security at risk by asking Ukraine to investigate his rivals, including Joe Biden, while withholding military aid for an ally trying to counter hostile Russia neighbors. They warn Trump could do it again if left unchecked.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Giuliani’s new 20-year-old spokeswoman has a shady resume and links to Ukraine henchmen

Published

on

President Donald Trump's allies are still trying to figure out why Rudy Giuliani hired a 20-year-old Instagram personality as his director of communications.

The president's personal attorney travels everywhere, including Ukraine, with Christianné Allen, a former teenage Trump campaign volunteer who has served since September as his media strategist and technology consultant, reported Politico.

“Nobody can figure out who the eff she is or how she got in there,” a friend of Giuliani told the website's Daniel Lippman.

Continue Reading