Quantcast
Connect with us

Is it an impeachment inquiry, an investigation or something else?

Published

on

Thanks for your support!
This article was paid for by reader donations to Raw Story Investigates.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

Terry H. Schwadron
Terry H. Schwadron

There has been a gymnastic drama going on in the Capitol, where fans of impeaching Donald Trump and those who think that process is not the best way to confront the president are writhing in definitional arm-wrestling.

Weirdly, any value you might assign to the actual words used, you can expect a lot more confrontational congressional committees towards Trump’s White House in the next weeks. Those hearings may or may not add up to impeachment efforts, which has been true until now, of course.

ADVERTISEMENT

The House Judiciary Committee, newly driven by the extraordinary efforts to land government meetings at Trump properties and to promise pardons for illegal acts to promote his agenda, has wanted to broaden the basis for impeachment, essentially to argue that profiting from the presidency is unconstitutional.

The committee, which has a majority of Democrats who favor impeachment proceedings, has voted to do so.

Of course, we all know Nancy Pelosi, as House Speaker, really wants to avoid impeachment, and the endless punditry of television commentators keeps warning us that the time to move forward with impeachment is very limited. So, Pelosi avoids words like “impeachment inquiry” for more general labels like “investigations.”

Pelosi is trying to protect all sides of her Democratic majority, of course, in hopes of holding onto it. As well, she knows that any impeachment effort, however right, will be quashed in the Senate.

Beyond this, we all know that some of the other strands for impeachment are still pending. The House Financial Services Committee is trying to get its hands on Deutsche Bank records that include the Trump tax filings and loan documents that could open up huge new avenues for questioning. And the House Judiciary Committee is still awaiting court confirmation of their power to subpoena and publicly question those involved in the Mueller Report who were witnesses to what many see as obstructions of justice incidents.

ADVERTISEMENT

But what has driven the new impeachment efforts has been actions by the president himself in trying to hustle the G-7 leaders to meet at his own Trump Doral resort property in Miami, followed by Vice President Mike Pence’s insane explanations of keeping a 200-member delegation 180 miles from a Dublin meeting site just to stay in a Trump hotel, among other such visits.

In total, The New York Times said that nearly $20 million has been spent at the Trump family hotels since 2015 by various, mostly Republican political groups, including Trump’s own political committees, according to a tally by the Center for Responsive Politics.

Trump also has promised pardons to federal employees he is asking to manipulate federal accounts to put more money aside for construction of his wall.

ADVERTISEMENT

Greg Sargent at The Washington Post puts it this way: “House Democrats are dramatically expanding their inquiry into whether to bring articles of impeachment against President Trump. That inquiry, which is being run out of the Judiciary Committee, will now include not just an examination of the special counsel’s findings but also scrutiny of Trump’s corruption — his dangling of pardons and his latest shameless acts of self-dealing. . . It might include scrutiny of financial information obtained from Deutsche Bank, which is being sought to determine whether Trump engaged in money laundering or whether his foreign dealings left him subject to foreign influence” and the profiteering charges. “Trump has pushed his corruption to the forefront. He publicly confirmed that he wants to host the next Group of Seven meeting at his Doral resort in Florida, an extraordinarily blatant act of self-dealing,” said Sargent.

But the drama this week is because House leadership appears dug in against any such vote.

ADVERTISEMENT

By Sargent’s argument, “the fact that members in moderate districts aren’t feeling constituent pressure on impeachment isn’t helping. But if that public case against Trump gets stronger and stronger — indeed, it’s already incredibly strong — that means not acting threatens to do serious political damage to Democrats, further dividing them and making them look feckless and unwilling to hold a corrupt president accountable.”

There is an amazingly futile feeling to all this. Trump does as he wants, with no limits, with no understanding of basic ethics – all because Senate Republicans are cowed by his political popularity among his base voters, voters who could be turned to primary them.

We have the Democrats having created a mess all by themselves, with the would-be sheriffs running around while the fox goes free. Rank and file Democrats don’t know exactly how to say whether we are actually on the impeachment path or not.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s hope that we can get beyond a debate over labels and get some sane thinking about what represents our American values here.

 

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Things are so bad for Republicans the GOP had to send money to Texas

Published

on

In 2016, then-anti-Trump Republican Sen. Linsey Graham proclaimed, "If we nominate Trump, we will get destroyed.......and we will deserve it." It seems his prediction is coming closer to fruition.

Financial reporting reveals that the Republican Party was forced to send $1.3 million to ruby-red Texas as the election nears.

It was something spotted by ProPublica developer and ex-reporter Derek Willis Sunday.

"That's never happened before," he tweeted.

He noted that the Texas GOP raised $3.3 million in August, but nearly half of that came from their national parents.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

What the London ‘Blitz’ reveals about how much pain and tragedy people can handle in 2020

Published

on

It's hard to imagine how 2020 could possibly get worse. "If we lose Betty White," a friend said on a drive to the Supreme Court to lay flowers.

So many Americans have lost friends or family members to COVID-19. Thousands of Americans survived the virus only to desperately needed organ transplants and forever will struggle to breathe the way they once did. Others are still suffering without smell or taste even three months after having the virus. Millions of Americans are out of work. Debt is stacking up for those trying to survive in the COVID economy. A lack of health insurance can mean hospitalizations from the virus are putting people into bankruptcy.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Stop trying to convince people you’re right — it will never persuade anyone: expert

Published

on

MSNBC host Joshua Johnson noted that this year has been full of strife, with Americans having a lot to stand up about. Whether the slaying of unarmed Black men and police brutality, or healthcare, and the coronavirus, Americans are lining up to protest.

Johnson asked if people try to start tough conversations, how do they keep it productive, and when it's time to give up. In her book, We Need to Talk, Celest Headlee explains tools that people can use to have productive conversations about tough issues that help move the needle.

"Keep in mind that a protest isn't a conversation, right?" she first began. "That's a different kind of communication. The first thing is that our goal in conversations is not always a productive one. In other words, oftentimes, we go into these conversations hoping to change somebody's mind or convince them that they are wrong. You're just never going to accomplish that. There's no evidence. We haven't been able to -- through years and years of research we haven't been able to find evidence that over a conversation somebody said, 'You're right, I was completely wrong.' You've convinced me. So, we have to stop trying to do that. We have to find a new purpose for those conversations."

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage.  Help us deliver it.  Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE