Quantcast
Connect with us

Julián Castro is skeptical of Trump’s ‘bizarre episode’ of calling off Taliban peace talks

Published

on

Julián Castro, the former Secretary of Housing and Urban Development who is running for president as a Democrat in 2020, told CNN’s “State of the Union” on Sunday that he felt President Donald Trump’s supposed peace talk attempts with the Taliban were “bizarre.”

“This is another bizarre episode, Jake, for two reasons,” Castro explained to CNN anchor Jake Tapper. “First of all, I think like most Americans I don’t know what to believe anymore that comes out of the mouth or the tweet of this president. Folks will remember that just a few days ago he said he had been in touch with China, apparently in order to try to calm the markets, and staff later said that that wasn’t the case. So the way he tweeted this out… I’m still looking for confirmation that an actual, physical trip to Camp David was planned.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Castro added that “if it was, if it had been planned, that’s bizarre as well. Because even though I do support a negotiated political settlement there that will increase stability and make sure that Afghanistan is not used as a base for terrorist operations, it is very odd to invite a terrorist organization like that to Camp David. That’s not in keeping with the way the United States negotiates.”

On Saturday Trump posted a trio of tweets on his Twitter account detailing what he claimed had been an effort to bring about negotiations between the Taliban and the official Afghanistan government at Camp David and why they had ultimately failed.

“Unbeknownst to almost everyone, the major Taliban leaders and, separately, the President of Afghanistan, were going to secretly meet with me at Camp David on Sunday. They were coming to the United States tonight. Unfortunately, in order to build false leverage, they admitted to an attack in Kabul that killed one of our great great soldiers, and 11 other people. I immediately cancelled the meeting and called off peace negotiations.” Trump tweeted.

He added, “What kind of people would kill so many in order to seemingly strengthen their bargaining position? They didn’t, they only made it worse! If they cannot agree to a ceasefire during these very important peace talks, and would even kill 12 innocent people, then they probably don’t have the power to negotiate a meaningful agreement anyway. How many more decades are they willing to fight?”

The United States and Taliban had engaged in nine rounds of talks over a period of nearly a year in order to smooth out most of the differences between the two countries, according to The New York Times. This resulted in a deal that would have established a 16-month timeline for the gradual withdrawal of America’s 14,000 remaining troops in the country and required the Taliban to provide counterterrorism assurances that would presumably protect Americans on United States soil. The Afghan government objected to this agreement on the grounds that America had negotiated for the release of thousands of Taliban prisoners in Afghan prisons even though the Taliban refused to reciprocate with a wide-scale ceasefire.

ADVERTISEMENT

That deal, criticized by Afghan officials for lacking measures that would ensure stability, would include a timeline of about 16 months for a gradual withdrawal of the remaining 14,000 American troops, with about 5,000 of them leaving in 135 days after its signing. In return, the Taliban would provide counterterrorism assurances to ease American fears of repeat of attacks on home soil — such as the attacks by Al Qaeda on Sept. 11, 2001, that precipitated the war in Afghanistan. Meanwhile the Taliban refused to meet with the Afghan government at Camp David on the grounds that doing so would have been political suicide, since they view the administration of Ashraf Ghani as a “stooge government.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Wall Street is abandoning Trump as his re-election bid looks doomed: report

Published

on

President Donald Trump has been sinking in the polls for weeks, as a combination of a deadly pandemic, freefalling economy, and nationwide racial unrest has started to undermine even some of his steadfast supporters' confidence in his ability to lead the nation. But for a long time, the financial industry and betting markets at least were more bullish on the president's ability to pull off another win.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

‘As bad as it gets’: GOP consultants have a secret admission about Trump — and a have a word of warning to ‘Lincoln Project’ Republicans

Published

on

Fox News and AM talk radio are full of GOP strategists and consultants who are happy to go on the air and recite pro-Trump talking points, but it’s often the anonymous quotes in outlets outside the right-wing bubble that offer insights on what Republicans are really thinking about President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign. Never Trump conservative Tim Miller interviewed nine different GOP consultants for a Rolling Stone article published this week, and they candidly discussed Trump’s chances of winning a second term.

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Kayleigh McEnany on Trump niece’s tell-all: ‘Have yet to see the book, but it is a book of falsehoods’

Published

on

White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany on Tuesday said that President Donald Trump's niece had published a "book of falsehoods."

While speaking to reporters, McEnany dismissed Mary Trump's tell-all book, which alleges that the president may have a learning disability and that he cheated on his SAT exams.

"Have yet to see the book, but it is a book of falsehoods," McEnany said. "It's a book of falsehoods and that's about it."

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image