Quantcast
Connect with us

Meghan McCain gets fact-checked on new Kavanaugh accuser — and asks if Clarence Thomas got impeached

Published

on

Meghan McCain (ABC)

“The View” host Whoopi Goldberg had to fact-check Meghan McCain’s description of a New York Times correction in a bombshell new report about Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

The newspaper reported that the FBI failed to interview former Yale classmates about sexual misconduct allegations against Kavanaugh during the confirmation process last fall, and the authors of a new book found a new accuser.

ADVERTISEMENT

McCain pointed to an editor’s note appended to the story that she believes casts doubt on the new reporting, but Goldberg asked her to clean up some of the claims she made.

“What we know about the article that came out, and again, I have not led investigations so I can’t speak to the legalities of it, but I can speak to the politics of it,” McCain said. “The woman that was named in the article that was supposedly victimized says she denies any memory of the alleged event.”

Goldberg interrupted, and pointed out that the new alleged victim, according to the Times, declined to be interviewed and friends said she does not recall the incident, which was recounted by former classmates.

“Okay,” McCain said, “again, this is very nebulous, and if it’s hard for us to explain, and I think the New York Times, the fact they didn’t mention it came from Max Stier who was a Clinton defense attorney who battled with Kavanaugh during the Whitewater investigation is a fact we should have known.”

McCain said the new allegations were too lewd to repeat on daytime television, but she didn’t think the report would change anyone’s opinion about Kavanaugh or his fitness to serve a lifetime judicial appointment.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is a battleground culture war issue right now,” she said. “There’s a thing called the ‘Kavanaugh effect,’ which happened during midterms where moderate Democrats ended up losing their seats because of Kavanaugh. Heidi Heitkamp, Claire McCaskill, Joe Donnelly, Bill Nelson. The politics of this — going into 2020, you want to impeach Trump and impeach Kavanaugh. Is that the winning strategy for democrats going forward in 2020? I want to know, do you think that’s what’s going to win over the Rust Belt?”

Co-host Sunny Hostin didn’t think Democrats would try to impeach Kavanaugh, because impeachment of a U.S. Supreme Court justice was historically rare and politically risky.

“It’s happened to federal judges, certainly,” Hostin said. “I think there have been impeachment proceedings against one Supreme Court justice, probably in the 1800s if I’m — tweet me if I’m wrong.”

ADVERTISEMENT

McCain asked if a justice hadn’t been targeted for impeachment more recently, and seemed genuinely surprised by Hostin’s answer.

“Clarence Thomas, did they?” McCain said. “No? Okay.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Hostin said the justice appears safe, but she said the president who appointed him might still face impeachment.

“It’s not going to happen, and it’s not a winning strategy,” Hostin said. “Impeaching Trump, I don’t know.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

CNBC’s Rick Santelli ripped as ‘psychopath’ for on-air ‘meltdown’ over COVID-19 restrictions

Published

on

CNBC's Andrew Ross Sorkin and Rick Santelli clashed over coronavirus restrictions, setting off another round of discussion on social media.

The conservative Santelli loudly insisted that bars and restaurants, which are shut down in many areas, were no more dangerous than large retailers, which have mostly been allowed to stay open, and Sorkin cut him off.

“Rick, just as a public-health and public-service announcement for the audience, the difference between a big-box retailer and a restaurant or, frankly, even a church, are so different it’s unbelievable,” Sorkin said, as Santelli kept interrupting. “Going into a big-box retailer, you’re wearing a mask.”

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Federal judge says Trump pardon of Michael Flynn may have been ‘too broad’: report

Published

on

A trial judge has raised the possibility that the federal judge overseeing the case of former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn could find that President Trump's pardon of Flynn may be "too broad," according to The National Law Journal.

The comments “came unexpectedly” during a Freedom of Information Act hearing about releasing documents from special counsel Robert Mueller's office, according to BuzzFeed reporter Jason Leopold.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

The View’s Ana Navarro drops the hammer on election challenge: ‘One more Trump fraud’

Published

on

"The View" co-host Ana Navarro called out President Donald Trump's efforts to undermine U.S. democracy as just another "grift."

The president's efforts to overturn his election loss to Joe Biden have set Republicans against each other in Georgia, where both Senate seats -- and the GOP majority -- remain up for grabs in a Jan. 5 runoff.

"When your enemy is shooting themselves, don't get in the way," Navarro said. "Look, if I were [Sen. Kelly] Loeffler or [Sen. David] Perdue, frankly, I would draw the curtains, bolt the doors, shut off the lights and ask somebody to wake me up when he's gone."

Continue Reading