Quantcast
Connect with us

Pentagon officials are allowing Trump to ‘profit off of the military’: Politico reporter

Published

on

On Saturday, Politico’s Natasha Bertrand spoke with MSNBC’s Joy Reid about her new reporting that Air Force transports made unusual stopovers at the Trump Turnberry resort in Scotland, as the resort gained $3 million in revenue in 2018.

“How unusual is it for a military transport to stop at a private hotel, any private hotel, rather than like Ramstein Airbase in Germany and the other official military bases where they stop?”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Very unusual, Joy,” said Bertrand. “[Trump Turnberry] made about $11 million off of U.S. military expenditures, off of the fuel that they’re selling to the U.S. military, and that really is kind of at the heart of all of this, because the airport is really necessary in order to keep Trump’s resort afloat, because the nearest airport other than that tiny airport is about an hour and a half away in Glasgow.”

“So what we’re seeing is not only are they using the airport in order to boost both the airport itself for the Scottish government and also Trump’s resort about 30 miles away,” said Bertrand. “They’re also sending the crew that go there to refuel overnight to stay at Trump’s resort, which then puts even more money into the pocket of the president, because the military is having to pay for the per diem allowances for food and drinks and the rooms themselves.”

“Per your reporting, was Prestwick Airport doing well financially before Donald Trump started using it instead of the airport they would normally use?” Joy pressed.

“No, it’s been struggling financially for years,” said Bertrand. “It was bought by the Scottish government in 2013 for one pound because it was essentially going into bankruptcy. The Scottish government considered selling it as recently as June of this year, because it was still struggling financially, but it has seen a boon from these expenditures that the U.S. military is spending on fuel at the airport, and it’s kind of keeping the airport afloat.”

“What we’re seeing, though, is that the crew members are kind of confused by what’s going on, because they’ve never before had to make this stop in Scotland, let alone in the United Kingdom at all,” added Bertrand. “Usually it’s Spain or Germany or the Azores or Italy, where they stop to refuel, but never before have some of these crews ever stopped at this tiny airport in Scotland, let alone at this tiny airport, so they are kind of baffled by this, which is why one of them blew the whistle and told a friend, and that is ultimately how we came upon this story.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“It would be the equivalent of President Jimmy Carter forcing the Pentagon to buy its peanuts from his peanut farm, right?” said Reid. “He of course got rid of his peanut farm when he became president but that’s the equivalent, forcing you to do business with the president.”

“This could be a violation of the domestic emoluments clause, because the president, other than his own salary, is not supposed to get any money from the federal government,” said Bertrand. “The fact the U.S. military seems to be spending money at Trump resorts seems to be in direct violation of that which is what the house oversight committee was getting to, when they wrote the letter, asking about the documents who approved this because it could be a violation of the Constitution.”

“What we also saw is foreign governments might be exploiting this as well,” added Bertrand. “We don’t know whether militaries of foreign governments and foreign potential adversaries are trying to curry favor with the president by propping up his resort in Turnberry by landing at this airport, by spending money there. This is all kind of interconnected, and just because the U.S. military is doing it, doesn’t mean that others aren’t taking cues from that. Whereas the military should be setting an example here and not, you know, allowing the president to profit off of the military, what we’re seeing is that they’ve actually just kind of gone along with this and we still don’t know who approved it at the highest levels.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Watch below:

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Facebook

Many Republicans privately admit their party is now ‘built largely on lies’: White House veteran

Published

on

In the wake of the first day of public hearings in the House impeachment inquiry into President Trump, contributor for The Atlantic and conservative think-tank fellow Peter Wehner wrote that yesterday's testimony from senior US diplomat Bill Taylor "was merely another massive boulder in the avalanche of evidence against the president."

"We are well beyond the point that any disinterested person can deny that the president abused his power and acted in a corrupt manner, in ways the American founders explicitly warned against," Wehner writes.

According to Wehner, yesterday's hearing only deepened the "complicity" of Republicans in Trump's latest scandal.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Ohio GOP bill may bar teachers from penalizing students who give creationist answers on biology tests: ACLU

Published

on

A bill that passed Ohio's House of Representatives this week is being criticized by the American Civil Liberties Union for vague language that could prevent biology teachers from penalizing students who give creationist answers to questions about evolution.

Local news station WKRC reports that the legislation, which passed the House and is now awaiting debate in the Ohio Senate, states that "students can't be penalized if their work is scientifically wrong as long as the reasoning is because of their religious beliefs."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Legal experts point out the giant flaw in Trump’s claims about rooting out Ukraine corruption

Published

on

Legal experts are noticing that President Donald Trump wasn't asking for a real investigation of Joe Biden, only one that could provide fodder for the news media.

Witnesses in the impeachment inquiry have testified that Trump wanted Ukrainian president to announce an investigation into Joe Biden and his son Hunter in an interview with CNN, in exchange for congressionally approved military aid or a White House visit.

"Trump demanding a Zelensky announce an investigation of Biden, 'in front of a microphone” gives the game away,'" tweeted Jennifer Taub, a professor at Vermont Law School. "If the real goal was to investigate corruption, a CNN announcement would be the wrong approach. Genuine investigations are kept secret."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image