Quantcast
Connect with us

Donald J. Trump: A graceless boor — even in victory

Published

on

- Commentary
Thanks for your support!
This article was paid for by reader donations to Raw Story Investigates.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

Terry H. Schwadron
Terry H. Schwadron

The announcement that U.S. commandos targeted and killed Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, founder and leader of ISIS, was welcome news, of course. Removal of the terrorist leader, plus retrieval of documents and plans, calls for congratulations.

That Donald Trump would make it a star turn for himself was, well, expected. It’s a legitimate accomplishment, by others, but on his watch. So good for us, and good for him.

ADVERTISEMENT

He even managed to thank others for their efforts, starting with Russia, Syria and Iraq, but including Syrian Kurds, as well as the same Deep State intelligence officers he has been spending years trashing.

 

I wanted badly to think this was strictly a good thing. But the failure to recognize the outstanding strategic questions, the apparent lack of communications with Congress, the jarring notes of the statement itself all fostered skepticism.

So, yes, the announcement left me wondering about the president’s overreach, the dripping ironies of the timing of the announcement when distraction is most needed from impeachment efforts and while U.S. policy in the region defies any logical explanation.

Among the inconsistencies:

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Trump has announced he is pulling any remaining American troops out of Syria – and shortly Iraq – only to step on his own toes in the days following the withdrawals by announcing that troops and tanks would be dispatched to protect oil fields rather than people. In the meantime, he refuses to acknowledge that he has abandoned those same Syrian Kurds who have been our allies to invading Turkish armies that are clearing a 20-mile strip of Syria, killing or chasing Kurds away.
  • Trump did acknowledge that intelligence officers had found al-Baghdadi some time ago – there was a dispute as to whether this was two weeks, as Trump said, or five months, as intelligence sources said. Further, Trump acknowledged that the raid was delayed a month while the Turkish incursion launched – at Trump’s OK. It takes some chutzpah for Trump to take credit for this commando raid when it was Trump’s actions that had delayed it.
  • In making the announcement, Trump once again claimed that he, and only he, as commander in chief, had defeated ISIS, again. By listening to him, Trump has defeated ISIS so many times now that it is difficult to count them all. Meanwhile, what American commandos eliminated yesterday was the ISIS leader, not its dispersed leadership through smaller, metastasized international cells. Despite Trump’s claims, ISIS will be back. There are more than 100 ISIS fighters at large from Kurdish prisons that had to be abandoned when the Kurds turned to face the Turks.
  • To my ear, Trump’s descriptions throughout his announcement were unduly demeaning, well beyond declaring someone a military enemy. Al-Baghdadi died “like a dog,” was “a sick, vicious puppy,” and died whimpering in a tunnel. Quite apart from the question of lacking any empathy for a death, even a necessary one, Trump’s language was incendiary. Think of how his words will be heard over and over in ISIS refugee camps and by Islamist revolutionaries looking for an excuse to rise anew. The smart move would have been a touch of humility – a gene missing from the Trump DNA.
  • The recon information needed to find al-Baghdadi came from exactly those same intelligence agencies that Trump regularly trashes for having found questionable, potentially impeachable offenses that Trump himself committed. Not others, Trump. Not other countries, Trump. It is beyond jarring to hear Trump suddenly find this particular incident to be the result of exemplary work from the same Deep State he abhors.

Along the way, there were sharp elbows for former President Barack Obama for not having killed al-Baghdadi earlier (where has Trump been for three years?), and an insistence that this death was somehow bigger and better than that of Osama bin Laden.

Even in a clear victory, Trump manages to press divides that will not make policies clearer or leave our country safer.

ADVERTISEMENT

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Impeachment managers release trial memorandum detailing why Trump must be removed from office

Published

on

House impeachment managers released an in-depth trial memorandum laying out the case for convicting President Donald Trump during his Senate impeachment trial.

The memorandum was released by representatives Adam Schiff (D-CA), Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), Val Demings (D-FL), Jason Crow (D-CO) and Sylvia Garcia (D-FL).

The document divides the argument by the House of Representatives into three points.

"The Senate should convict President Trump of abuse of power," is the first section.

"The Senate should convict President Trump of obstruction of Congress," is the second section.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

He ‘can’t understand why he is being impeached’: CNN reports Trump is asking ’why are they doing this to me?’

Published

on

President Donald Trump is reportedly "distracted" by impeachment while vacationing at Mar-a-Lago as the United States Senate trial begins.

"A source close to the White House who speaks to Donald Trump regularly said the President has appeared 'distracted' by the impeachment trial that begins on Tuesday, telling people around him Friday night at Mar-a-Lago that he 'can't understand why he is impeached,'" CNN's Jim Acosta reported Saturday. "'Why are they doing this to me,' the source quoted Trump as saying repeatedly."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Rod Rosenstein’s legal defense in lawsuits from Strzok and Page won’t hold up under oath: legal experts

Published

on

Rod Rosenstein

Former Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein claimed responsibility for the release of text messages between then-FBI attorney Lisa Page and then-FBI official Peter Strzok.

Emails released in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit by the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) revealed the highly unusual release by Sarah Isgur Flores, who at the time was the spokesperson for Trump's Department of Justice (she is now overseeing CNN's 2020 election coverage).

Flores instructed reporters to not cite the release of the documents to the Depart of Justice.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image