Quantcast
Connect with us

Here are 3 winners and 4 losers from the CNN/NYT Democratic presidential primary debate

Published

on

- Commentary

Twelve Democrats took to the stage Tuesday night for yet another debate in the party’s 2020 president primary hosted by CNN and the New York Times.

After only ten candidates qualified for the previous debate, an additional two — Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and wealthy donor and former hedge fund manager Tom Steyer — made it to the stage this round for an even more crowded event.

ADVERTISEMENT

The candidates discussed a range of important policy issues, but since the format was a debate, and they’re all competing for the same nomination, it is ultimately most critical who won and who lost the night. Here are three winners and four losers — necessarily a subjective assessment, of course — from the debate:

Winners:

Elizabeth Warren — As Warren has sharply risen in the polls, her rivals clearly perceived her as the one to beat Tuesday night — despite former Vice President Joe Biden’s own strength among voters. And for the first night in which she was viewed as a frontrunner, Warren took many hits and criticisms, and not just about “Medicare for All.” At points early in the debate, these attacks seemed to catch her off guard, and she spent a fair amount of time on the defensive. But this also meant she got a lot of screen time — likely the most of any candidate — and she stood out. And as the debate continued on, she became more sure-footed, displayed her broad policy knowledge, and culminated in a memorable moment in which she touted her own success establishing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. She even pointedly suggested that former President Barack Obama was key to getting the legislation passed, rather than Biden, as he claimed. And though she came under fire, her opponents’ attacks served to elevate her at least as much as they damaged her.

She also had a powerful response when asked if she would be able to take on the sitting president, given her age: “I will outwork, out-organize, and outlast anyone — Donald Trump, Mike Pence or whoever the Republicans get stuck with.”

Bernie Sanders — The Vermont senator had a lot to prove in this debate. Having recently suffered a heart attack at age 78, his performance was under close scrutiny. But despite these worries, Sanders gave a strong and confident performance. And when the moderators moved to turn the conversation to the candidates’ health statuses, he ably cracked a joke to defuse the tension. And, it should be said, despite his recent health struggle, he came off stronger and more capable than Biden, who is two years younger.

And when Biden attacked Sanders’ and Warren’s plan for Medicare for All as “vague campaigns,” the Vermont senator forcefully hit back — saying that the vice president “also got done” the Iraq War, NAFTA, and a bankruptcy bill that, Sanders said, hurt American families.

ADVERTISEMENT

Julián Castro — Many of the lower-polling candidates not in the top three had stand out moments during the debate. But among them, in my view, Castro stood at more than others, particularly for two impactful moments. During an emotional discussion about gun control, Castro skillfully and powerfully brought up the persistent problem of police violence and shootings as a central issue, mentioning the recent devastating killing of Atatiana Jefferson. And at another point in the debate about Trump’s abandoning of the Kurds in northern Syria, he skillfully drew a stark contrast with the president’s brutal immigration policies, asking viewers “to think about how absurd it is that this president is caging kids on the border and effectively letting ISIS prisoners run free.”

Losers:

Donald Trump — The night opened with moderator Anderson Cooper asking each candidate about the prospect of impeaching Trump. While once upon a time, the subject of impeachment split the Democrats, the night showed that the party is now united behind the idea. Each candidate was given an opportunity to deliver a litany of Trump’s crimes and violations and stand up for law and order in the country in opposition to a lawless president. In some of the previous debates, the president has gone largely unmentioned — but his failings were placed front and center on Tuesday.

Tulsi Gabbard — Gabbard predictably took the least aggressive stance in response to the impeachment question, reiterating that she has only recently come around to supporting the inquiry because of the Ukraine scandal. But she also needlessly warned that impeachment would be divisive — as if that were the Democrats’ fault, rather than Trump’s — and insisted that Trump was elected fairly in 2016, a dubiously claim in on its own. She didn’t even sound confident that she would, in the end, vote for impeachment as a member of Congress — let alone support the Senate removing the president. It was a bizarre look for a person running to be the Democratic presidential nominee.

ADVERTISEMENT

She later gave an awkward and confusing defense of her foreign policy views, repeatedly and robotically using the phrase “regime-change war” to describe U.S. efforts in Syria.

Tom Steyer — The businessman who essentially bought his way on to the 2020 Democratic debate stage had a pretty poor showing for his first time appearing with his fellow candidates. He repeatedly insisted that government, as it stands, is too corrupted to serve the American people well — but he never explained why his being elected president would change that. He was unable to give a convincing explanation of why he was better or different than his opponents. And though he was willing to say the billionaires like himself should be more taxed more, he also oddly seemed to imply later that, as a businessman, he was best-suited to take on Trump with regard to economic issues — an unpersuasive claim, and one that is unlikely to get him far in a Democratic primary.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Democratic National Committee— Somehow, the DNC’s rules for the fall debates resulted in more candidates on Tuesday’s debate stage than the previous debate. Having ten candidates onstage in September was unwieldy enough — having 12 now was a complete mess. It seems much more natural and sensible for debates later in the primaries to have fewer candidates, rather than more. The fact that the DNC’s rules ended up with the opposite result was baffling.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Your election angst is real: Trump’s gonna cheat and it could be total hell

Published

on

During the presidential campaign of 1988, "Saturday Night Live's" Dana Carvey played then-Vice President George H.W. Bush as a lovable oddball and Jon Lovitz portrayed Democratic candidate Michael Dukakis as an emotionally detached technocrat, musing out loud during a debate, "I can't believe I'm losing to this guy."

Even though it was a comedy sketch, that line has been thrown in Democrats' faces ever since as an example of their arrogant elitism and failure to understand Real America. Don't you know that the average voter wants a president they can have a beer with, not some egghead know-it-all?

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump preparing to question legitimacy of results if he loses 2020 election: Michigan lieutenant governor

Published

on

Lt. Gov. Garlin Gilchrist, D-Mich., has accused President Donald Trump of sowing doubt about November's election months before voting even begins in an attempt to question the "legitimacy of an election that he is looking to lose."

Gilchrist criticized Trump for pushing debunked conspiracy theories about voting by mail after the state sent absentee ballot applications to every registered voter amid the coronavirus pandemic.

"I think that the president wants to set us up so that there can be a conversation about the legitimacy of an election that he is looking to lose," Gilchrist told MSNBC over the weekend. "That is a really unfortunate thing. That's not how we do democracy here in the United States, and we need to be ready to respond to that forcefully."

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

‘Recipe for disaster’: NC doctor slams Trump’s hopes for a packed GOP convention as ‘an incredibly bad idea’

Published

on

A North Carolina strongly cautioned his state's governor from caving in to President Donald Trump's wishes for a packed Republican National Convention.

The president has threatened to move the RNC this summer from Charlotte if Gov. Roy Cooper did not ease coronavirus restrictions to allow for a full-scale event, but a local physician told WCNC-TV that Trump's plan was unreasonable.

"What do we know about infections?" said Dr. Jeffrey Galvin, of the Vitality Medical Wellness group. "Infection requires two things, exposure plus time."

Trump wants to pack 20,000 Republicans, journalists and others into Spectrum Center in August, but Galvin said infected people shed small amounts of the virus every time they breathe.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image