Quantcast
Connect with us

Historians demolish John Yoo for claim Founding Fathers wouldn’t want Trump impeached in an election year

Published

on

Comments made by attorney and law professor John Yoo on Fox News on the Founding Father’s intentions about impeachment received a brutal debunking by two historians — including one of his colleagues at UC Berkeley.

Appearing with Fox News personality Laura Ingraham, lawyer Yoo — who is infamous for providing President George W. Bush’s administration with legal justifications for the torture of prisoners of war — claimed that the Founding Fathers would object to the president being impeached in an election year.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Yoo, Democrats are getting it all wrong when they say the Constitution compels them to hold impeachment proceedings against Trump just one year before the election.

“I’m glad they’re reading the Constitution and citing the framers for once but they’ve got it exactly backwards,” Yoo asserted. “What the framers thought was the American people would judge a president at the time of an election, they would have never wanted an impeachment within a year of an election, it’s up to the American people.”

According to Cal historian Brain Delay, the lawyer is dead wrong.

“My colleague John Yoo teaches in the Law School and absolutely doesn’t understand what the founders would and wouldn’t have wanted re: impeachment,” he tweeted while attaching a clip of Yoo’s appearance.

ADVERTISEMENT

Oregon State University historian Christopher Nichols joined the pile-on by tweeting, “If only we could know what the founders thought about this & if they would confirm John Yoo’s view. Oh wait, we do! July 20, 1787 they discussed this and EXPLICITLY rejected Yoo’s view, including some who once held such an opinion reversing course.”

With that, it was on as Nichols provided a multitude of links on the country’s founders’ views on impeachment based upon their own writings — all of which effectively debunked Yoo’s unscholarly opinion.

ADVERTISEMENT

You can see them below:

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Mar-a-Lago to host event for conspiracy nuts who believed Obama was a secret Muslim

Published

on

President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago club is hosting an event for a far-right organization that once spread bogus conspiracy theories about former President Barack Obama being a secret Muslim.

The Washington Post reports that Trump's prized Florida resort on Saturday night will play host to the Center for Security Policy, a group that believes "mainstream Muslim organizations in the United States are secretly agents of anti-American jihad."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Lev Parnas wants to testify — and attorney says ‘he has hard—HARD—first-hand evidence’

Published

on

One of Rudy Giuliani's indicted henchman wants to testify -- and his attorney says he's got "first-hand evidence."

Federal prosecutors have issued subpoenas to Parnas and his associate Igor Fruman, and the Parnas has indicated that he wants to speak to congressional investigators.

"Lev grew up in Brooklyn, has no criminal record or Russian Mob ties, and is a proud American citizen," said his attorney Joseph Bondy. "He’s not afraid of #POTUS or polonium, hopes to testify under oath — unlike #RudyGiuliani — and to be subjected to cross-examination under penalties of perjury. #LetLevSpeak"

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

‘Bootlicker’ Jim Jordan scorched by veteran Ohio journalist: ‘His life’s work is to besmirch everything America stands for’

Published

on

A veteran Cleveland newsman scalded Rep. Jim Jordan and the Ohio lawmakers who inflicted him on Congress with a partisan gerrymandering scheme.

Brent Larkin, editorial director of The Plain Dealer from 1991 until he retired in 2009, called his congressman the "second most contemptible human being in the entire U.S. government," and said Ohio Democrats were as much to blame for him as GOP legislators.

"When Ohio’s political and legislative leaders were drawing new congressional boundaries prior to the 2012 election, Democrats wanted a district that would protect U.S. Rep. Marcia Fudge," Larkin wrote. "Republicans wanted districts that would elect the maximum number of GOP congressmen. And some people from both parties wanted a district that would likely lead to the defeat of longtime Cleveland Rep. Dennis Kucinich."

Continue Reading