Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump has a plan to destroy every impeachment witness against him: report

Published

on

According to a report at the Daily Beast, President Donald Trump has a two-pronged strategy to undermine every witness who could provide damaging information against as part of the House’s impeachment inquiry against him – and it is already in play.

In a nutshell, the White House and TRump’s most avid backers in Congress will claim that anyone who did not directly witness Trump committing any crimes will be dismissed as repeating “hearsay” and those who did witness it will be banned from testifying using executive privilege.

ADVERTISEMENT

As the Beast reports, “Donald Trump asserts that testimony by witnesses who learned about his scheme to shake down Ukraine from other presidential advisers should be disregarded as ‘hearsay.’ Trump also asserts that John Bolton and other White House officials who were in the room with him are constitutionally ‘immune’ from congressional subpoenas. ”

Faced with a flood of subpoenas that are likely to increase as the impeachment inquiry goes forward, the White House is girding for a fight for the president’s survival.

The White House’s “claim that will be tested in court Thursday afternoon, when a federal court holds a hearing on Deputy National Security Adviser Charles Kupperman’s lawsuit seeking a ruling on whether he must comply with a congressional subpoena following “the assertion of immunity from congressional process made by the President.” Charles Cooper, Kupperman’s lawyer, is a former Reagan administration official who also represents John Bolton. Also on Thursday, an argument will be held in a separate proceeding brought by Congress to compel former White House Counsel Don McGahn’s testimony in the face of an earlier White House claim of immunity,” the Beast reports.

“By Trump’s through-the-looking-glass logic, witnesses who work outside the White House should be disregarded, while witnesses who were in the room for Trump’s alleged abuses of power first-hand may not be heard,” David Lurie reports. “Trump’s claim of ‘constitutional immunity’ goes well beyond an assertion of executive privilege, which is qualified, meaning that it can be overcome by a showing of sufficient need. The Supreme Court has ruled that otherwise potentially privileged presidential communications must be disclosed in law enforcement proceedings if they contain potential evidence of a crime. Congress likewise has a strong argument that a presidential executive privilege claim must give way during its impeachment inquiry.”

According to the report, Trump’s White House is attempting a Hail Mary in court with the hope of derailing the whole process.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If the Supreme Court upholds Trump’s immunity argument against permitting the testimony of close presidential advisers and sufficient numbers of senators accept Graham’s argument for disregarding the so-called ‘hearsay’ testimony of Taylor and others, then Trump could deny critical evidence from Congress, thereby effectively rendering himself immune from impeachment and removal. At the very least, ongoing litigation might allow Trump to play for time,” the report explains, adding “It has long been understood that the immunity doctrine applies only to ‘close’ presidential advisers, defined as the most senior officials who assist the president on a daily basis and therefore constitute his alter egos. For this reason, some lower level, but still relatively senior officials, such as former National Security Council Russia expert Fiona Hill and Ukraine expert Alexander Vindman, have complied with congressional subpoenas for their testimony.”

You can read more here (subscription required).

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Intelligence failure: Donald Trump’s personal politics comes second to national security

Published

on

Joe Maguire, a Manhattan College alum whose life and career we admire, is out as President Trump’s acting director of national intelligence for committing an unpardonable sin. He told the unvarnished truth.A president needs confidence in his appointees. Trump apparently has more trust in Maguire’s replacement, U.S. Ambassador to Germany Ric Grenell, despite the fact that he lacks a background in intelligence.But watch that trust evaporate if and when Grenell dares deliver facts the president really doesn’t want to hear.A week ago, a Maguire aide briefed the House Intelligence Committee on a bi... (more…)

Continue Reading

2020 Election

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews suggests four more years of Trump might be better for Democratic Party

Published

on

As Sen. Bernie Sanders appeared headed for a decisive victory Saturday in the Nevada caucuses, MSNBC host Chris Matthews pondered whether President Donald Trump's re-election might be better for the Democratic establishment than the Vermont senator's multiracial, multigenerational movement taking over the party.

"I'm wondering if Democratic moderates want Bernie Sanders to be President?" said Matthews. "Maybe that's too exciting a question to raise. Do they want Bernie to take over the Democratic Party in perpetuity? Maybe they'd rather wait 4 years and put in a Democrat that they like."

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Trump supporters have little trust in society’s institutions — and here’s why that’s disturbing

Published

on

by Miriam Boon, University of Amsterdam; Andreu Casas Salleras, University of Amsterdam; Ericka Menchen-Trevino, American University School of Communication, and Magdalena Wojcieszak, University of California, Davis [This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.]

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image