Quantcast
Connect with us

Conservative columnist gives passionate defense of Lt. Col. Vindman — recalling fears of his own Soviet-born family

Published

on

Republicans are facing backlash for their poor treatment of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman who appeared before the House Intelligence Committee Tuesday as part of the impeachment inquiry. It prompted conservative Washington Post columnist Max Boot to unleash his own fury against Republican Congressmen he felt should know better.

Noting that Vindman is “no coward,” Boot described the shaking hands of the decorated Iraq War veteran as he nervously read his opening statement.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Vindman and his colleagues have already faced attacks that he rightly described as ‘vile’ and ‘reprehensible,'” wrote Boot in his column. “After Vindman gave a deposition behind closed doors last month, President Trump denounced him as a ‘Never Trumper.’ When asked what evidence he has of the political leanings of this career military officer who still works in the Trump White House, the president promised in his thuggish way that ‘We’ll be showing that to you real soon, okay?'”

As with many of Trump’s accusations, no evidence has been presented and Boot said that there likely isn’t any forthcoming.

In a shocking act, the official White House Twitter account even attacked Vindman. An account that normally promotes garden tours, and non-partisan celebrations of visitors to the historic building, is now parroting the president’s language and attacks on Democratic officials.

“Presumably, Vindman suggested keeping Ukraine separate from relations with Russia because Trump has an inexplicable soft spot for Russia,” Boot suggested. Even Republicans have agreed Trump’s cozy relationship with Putin was concerning.

“But for pure maliciousness, it is hard to top the gall of Trump partisans who question Vindman’s loyalty to the United States because he emigrated here as a toddler from the Soviet Union,” Boot wrote. “Republican counsel Steve Castor continued those nasty aspersions of dual loyalty on Tuesday by extensively questioning Vindman about an offer extended to him out of the blue by a Ukrainian official to become defense minister of Ukraine. Vindman said he rejected the proposal and reported it to his superiors, because he is an American. Questioning Vindman about this — and demanding to know whether he had been speaking Ukrainian — is sheer McCarthyism.”

ADVERTISEMENT

He noted that the attacks pose an actual danger to Vindman, whose “good name” has clearly been smeared. Already Vindman and his family are being moved into a military base because their security is in question, The Wall Street Journal reported.

In the final moments of his opening statement, Vindman reassured his father that he would be fine “for telling the truth.” It’s apparently something his father feared as his son spoke truth to power.

“Vindman’s reassurance to his father resonated with me — another Jewish immigrant from the Soviet Union who came to the United States as a young boy in the 1970s,” Boot wrote. “People raised in tyrannical regimes such as the Soviet Union grow up with a terror of doing anything that could result in a trip to the gulag.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Boot said that even today, his 84-year-old Russian-born stepfather, was concerned something terrible might happen to him for his columns attacking Trump in the Washington Post. His stepfather has lived in California for more than 40 years.

“Like Vindman, I assure my loved one that I will be fine — and I truly believe this because I am exercising my constitutionally protected free-speech rights,” Boot wrote. “But then I am not an existential threat to Trump’s political survival; Vindman is. Along with his fellow witnesses, he is presenting incontrovertible evidence that the president has committed high crimes and misdemeanors. No wonder Vindman is visibly nervous. In testifying anyway, he is vindicating the highest ideals of a country where no man, not even the president, is above the law. Vindman was not born here, but he is a far better American than the Trump toadies who question his loyalty.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Read the powerful column at The Washington Post.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Mitch McConnell’s impeachment rules pass by 53-47 vote — here’s what happens next in Trump’s senate trial

Published

on

The US Senate voted along party lines on Tuesday to set the rules for President Donald Trump's historic impeachment trial.

By a 53 to 47 vote, the Republican-controlled Senate approved an "organizing resolution" for the trial proposed by Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Before approving the rules, the Senate voted down several amendments proposed by Democrats seeking to subpoena witnesses and documents from the White House and State Department.

These are the next phases in Trump's impeachment trial, just the third of a president in US history:

- Opening arguments -

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Chief Justice Roberts admonishes lawyers at Senate impeachment trial

Published

on

Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court John Roberts made his first major intervention in President Donald Trump's impeachment trial shortly before 1 a.m. Wednesday morning.

After House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) finished his closing arguments on why former National Security Advisor John Bolton should testify, the White House team went on the attack. Yelling and demanding apologies, the president's team was more animated than they'd been all night. Roberts then admonished the House and White House on their language.

Claiming the Senate is the "world's greatest deliberative body" -- despite what he had witnessed during 12 hours of the impeachment trial -- Roberts complained about language that was "not conducive to civil discourse."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

White House lawyers begin yelling at Democrats during late-night impeachment trial — after Trump starts tweeting

Published

on

President Donald Trump woke up and began tweeting around midnight EST during the Senate impeachment trial over the amendments over the rules. That's when a noticeable thing changed on the Senate floor: Trump's team started yelling.

Nearing 1 a.m. EST Tuesday morning while the president was tweeting about impeachment, his team began attacking Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) personally. They called him a liar and accused him of attacking the president and demanded an apology. After nearly 12 hours this was the first time the White House got even remotely animated after a dull defense of the president.

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image