Two witnesses gave powerful and important testimony beginning Tuesday morning as the impeachment hearings into President Donald Trump continued.
Republicans finally got what they’ve been asking for in the form of two firsthand witnesses to President Donald Trump’s conduct — National Security Council staffer Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and Jennifer Williams, an aide to Vice President Mike Pence — but they weren’t happy with what they heard. Both Williams and Vindman were stunned and disturbed by Trump’s July 25 call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
Here are seven remarkable moments from the hearing:
1. Vindman laid out why Trump’s “inappropriate” demand for Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden was so disturbing.
“The Ukrainian judiciary is imperfect at the moment,” he said. “And the reliance on US support could conceivably cause them to tip the scales of justice in favor of finding a U.S. citizen guilty if they felt they needed to do it.”
ALEXANDER VINDMAN on TRUMP call for Ukraine investigations:
“The Ukrainian judiciary is imperfect at the moment. And the reliance on US support could conceivably cause them to tip the scales of justice in favor of finding a U.S. citizen guilty if they felt they needed to do it.” pic.twitter.com/DANb6vq5T7
— JM Rieger (@RiegerReport) November 19, 2019
2. Vindman made clear that — despite Trump defenders’ claims that the president only cared about fighting corruption Ukraine, not his own re-election campaign — he never mentioned “corruption” in his two phone calls with President Zelensky.
Schiff: "Did talking points [prepared for POTUS for April 21 call] include rooting out corruption in Ukraine?"
Schiff: "Did Pres. Trump ever mention corruption in the April 21 call?"
Vindman: "To the best of my recollection, he did not." https://t.co/lmTBBmoYVV pic.twitter.com/cvmg1FVRCg
— CBS Evening News (@CBSEveningNews) November 19, 2019
3. Williams reacted to the president’s attacks on her.
“I was not expecting to be called out by name,” she said.
"I was not expecting to be called out by name," Jennifer Williams said about President Trump's tweet attacking her loyalty before her testimony.
— The New York Times (@nytimes) November 19, 2019
4. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) spoke out against the attacks on Vindman suggesting he was insufficiently loyal to the United States.
“From one immigrant American to another immigrant American, I want to say to you that you and your family represent the very best of America,” he said.
Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi blasts commentators who have questioned Vindman because he is an immigrant:
— CBS News (@CBSNews) November 19, 2019
5. Vindman read Fiona Hill’s evaluation of him.
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) tried to attack Vindman’s credibility, saying his supervisors had expressed concerns about him. But the witness was prepared for this line of questioning, and he responded by reading a glowing review of him from Hill.
— Brother Nyght (@wondermann5) November 19, 2019
6. “Lt. Col.”
Vindman corrected Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) for not calling him by his rank.
Rep. Devin Nunes refers to Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman as "Mr. Vindman."
— ABC News (@ABC) November 19, 2019
Republicans have been trying to use the proceedings to out the whistleblower, but Schiff has said he won’t let the hearings be used for that purpose.
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) November 19, 2019
Trump’s healthcare order blasted as a ‘bribe’ to seniors and a ‘joke’ to the rest of America
President Donald Trump's healthcare plan was blasted Thursday for pushing things that are already in place, taking credit for past laws and making grand announcements that Trump will never be able to ensure actually happen. It took Trump five years to come up with this healthcare "plan."
To start, Trump began by making the same promise that President Barack Obama did - "If you like your doctor you can keep them." The regulation of which doctors are covered under healthcare plans aren't handled by the government as individual insurance companies make their own corporate decisions about which doctors are covered under their plans.
Trump turns to extortion as he struggles in the polls
In conversations about Donald Trump’s contempt for the rule of law, civic-republican institutions and democratic norms, you have probably run into the following. The president’s term ends January 20, 2021. If by then the election has no clear winner, and that could be the case, the constitutional order of succession goes to US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Don’t you worry. Similarly, in conversations about the role of the US Supreme Court, if it ends up deciding the election, you have probably heard the following. Whoever the new justice is, he or she won’t be involved in the court’s ruling, because professional legal ethics require recusing himself or herself. Don’t you worry.
Republicans should be careful what they wish for
When it comes to the issue of abortion rights, America’s 50 states hold widely differing views and don’t break down along red-blue lines as predictably as one might expect.
That might be good news for former Vice President Joe Biden.
As the nation prepares for an epic battle over a Supreme Court nomination to replace the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, some key battleground states aren’t as closely divided on abortion as they are on the presidency. President Donald Trump’s rush to fill the vacant seat might supercharge evangelicals in his base nationally, but with some irony, he might not be doing himself any favors at the Electoral College.