Quantcast
Connect with us

Democrats face critical decision on adding new charges to articles of impeachment

Published

on

House Democrats are divided over whether to add special counsel Robert Mueller’s evidence to the impeachment process.

The House Judiciary Committee on Monday will hear evidence turned up during testimony from the impeachment inquiry focusing on President Donald Trump’s efforts to pressure Ukraine into investigating Joe Biden, but some Democrats want to expand the process to include the Russia investigation, reported The Daily Beast.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This office has been abused and damaged in profound ways,” said Rep. Jared Huffman (D-CA). “I personally would be for holding him accountable for every bit of it. Not for every grievance we have — I wouldn’t include his bad behavior or his offensive rhetoric — but some specific actions that I believe that have abused authority and rise to the level of impeachable offense, in my view, would go well beyond the current Ukraine scandal.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has made clear she changed her mind on impeachment after the whistleblower report moved public polling in favor of the constitutional process, which didn’t happen after Mueller released his report and then testified about his findings before Congress.

“The polls went from 59 percent opposed to impeachment, to 34 in favor, to now even,” Pelosi said.

Now that public support has moved toward supporting impeachment, House Democrats are weighing whether to expand the probe to include wrongdoing turned up by Mueller’s investigation.

“From the very beginning, we were clear that the process should be clear, strategic, and efficient,” said Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), a first-year lawmaker from a district Trump won.

ADVERTISEMENT

Slotkin helped persuade Pelosi to support the impeachment inquiry in September, but she wants it to focus solely on the whistleblower’s complaint.

“We got that strategic focus on specific articles, hone in on those,” she said. “Don’t take a kitchen-sink approach, really think strategically, and then efficient. This doesn’t need to be an 18-month process. I have made myself clear that it should be a very tight group of articles, very limited, very focused.”

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) said Sunday that one article of impeachment could be based on Mueller’s findings to establish a “pattern” of wrongdoing by Trump, and other Democrats agree that could be wise.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If there is an obstruction article, how do you ignore documented evidence of obstruction by the special counsel, for which he essentially said, ‘I’m not charging because of the Justice Department policy regarding the charging of a president,’ the Congress has remedies available,” said Rep. Dan Kildee (D-MI). “To me, that’s just like, a great big blinking light that says, yeah, you really need to look at that.”

Some Democrats believe that including a Mueller-based article could give moderates something to vote against, but some aides believe the special counsel’s report is “toxic.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Largely, there’s no support of idea of bringing up articles about Mueller,” said one Democratic aide. “Thirty-one Democratic members of Congress in Trump districts are going to be living with the decisions he makes for the next year.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Follow the money on impeachment: Trump bought off the McConnell and the rest of the GOP jury — and hints at bigger tax cuts

Published

on

Republican senators are making millions off of Trump’s tax cuts — and will repay him by betraying their oath.

It's long been obvious that Republican senators have little interest in serving as impartial jurors in the impeachment trial of Donald Trump. While there is a raft of motivations for such historic perfidy — with several GOP senators politically benefiting from some of the same corrupting influences — one under-examined, non-Russian reason is personal greed.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Rattled’ White House was blindsided by Bolton revelations: report

Published

on

In an appearance on CNN's "New Day," on Monday morning, Axios reporter Jonathan Swan revealed that the Donald Trump's White House was "rattled" by revelations contained in former national security advisor John Bolton's upcoming book -- and that they appeared to be unaware of them until they read them in the New York Times.

Speaking with hosts Alisyn Camerota, and John Berman, Swan was asked how the White House was responding to the bombshell revelations that blow a huge hole in Trump's impeachment defense.

"The New York Times knew about the content of the Bolton book before you say the press shop at the White House did. What itself is the significance there?" host Berman asked.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Frantic Trump tries to block Senate from calling Bolton after bombshell book blows up his Ukraine defense

Published

on

President Donald Trump went to bed fretting about John Bolton, and he woke up worried about his former national security adviser.

Excerpts from Bolton's new book leaked Sunday, claiming that Trump told him that Ukraine aid was tied to an investigation of Joe Biden and his son -- putting new pressure on Republican senators to approve additional witness testimony in the impeachment trial.

"The Democrat controlled House never even asked John Bolton to testify," Trump tweeted Monday morning. "It is up to them, not up to the Senate!"

The Democrat controlled House never even asked John Bolton to testify. It is up to them, not up to the Senate!

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image