Quantcast
Connect with us

New analysis details ‘aggressive’ tax dodging of six Silicon Valley giants—totaling over $100 billion

Published

on

Among the tech companies studied, Amazon “stands out as the business with the poorest tax conduct,” according to the U.K.-based Fair Tax Mark.

Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Netflix have collectively dodged over $100 billion in global taxes so far this decade, according to an analysis released Monday by a U.K.-based tax transparency campaign group.

ADVERTISEMENT

Later this week, the Fair Tax Mark plans to publish its full report on the tax conduct of the companies, entitled The Silicon Six and Their $100 Billion Global Tax Gap. The report’s key findings were detailed on the group’s website Monday.

“Our analysis of the long-run effective tax rate of the Silicon Valley Six over the decade to date has found that there is a significant difference between the cash taxes paid and both the headline rate of tax and, more significantly, the reported current tax provisions,” said the Fair Tax Mark chief executive Paul Monaghan. “We conclude that the corporation tax paid has been much lower than is commonly understood.”

The Fair Tax Mark studied each company’s annual filings in the United States—where the tech giants are incorporated—as well as some quarterly filings and accounts of subsidiaries over the period of 2010–2019. The group found that the collective global tax gap between the expected headline rates and the cash taxes paid was $155.3 billion. The gap between the current tax provisions and cash taxes was $100.2 billion.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The report suggests that the bulk of the shortfall almost certainly arose outside the United States, given that the foreign current tax charge was just 8.4% of identified foreign profits,” the group explained. “Profits continue to be shifted to tax havens, especially Bermuda, Ireland, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands.”

The Fair Tax Mark determined that Amazon, whose CEO Jeff Bezos is the richest individual in the world, “stands out as the business with the poorest tax conduct” among the Silicon Six. The headline corporate tax rate in the U.S. was 35% for most of the years studied, but the group found that Amazon paid only $3.4 billion in income taxes—just 12.7% of profit—during the analyzed period.

“The company is growing its market domination across the globe on the back of revenues that are largely untaxed, and can unfairly undercut local businesses that take a more responsible approach,” the group said, warning that “the situation is unlikely to reverse soon.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Guardian reported that Amazon pushed back against the findings, saying that the report’s “suggestions are wrong” and the company had “a 24% effective tax rate on profits from 2010–2018.”

Facebook ranked as the second-worst offender, having paid just 10.2% of its profit. Google, whose cash tax paid as a percentage of profit was 15.8%, came in third. Netflix, in the fourth spot, “proved to be the most difficult to rank,” and had the same cash tax percentage as Google.

ADVERTISEMENT

Facebook told The Guardian that “we take our tax obligations seriously and pay what we owe in every market we operate. In 2018 we paid $3.8bn in corporation tax globally and our effective tax rate over the last five years is more than 20%.”

“When multinational corporations abuse their tax responsibilities to society, they weaken the supports that our economies need to work well and create wealth.”
—Alex Cobham, Tax Justice Network

Apple ranked fifth. The Fair Tax Mark pointed out that although Apple “presents itself as ‘the world’s largest taxpayer’ and it certainly makes the largest tax contribution of the Silicon Six,” the company’s cash tax paid as a percentage of profit was still just 17.1%.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Microsoft, by a slim margin, has the least aggressive approach to tax avoidance of the six,” the tax group concluded. Microsoft was co-founded by the world’s second-richest individual, Bill Gates, and “makes the second largest tax contribution of the Silicon Six,” according to the analysis. The company’s cash tax paid as a percentage of profit was 16.8%.

The Fair Tax Mark’s Monaghan said Monday that “the international tide is turning on the acceptability of corporate tax avoidance. The idea of countering the profit-shifting of Big Tech multinationals via the introduction of digital sales taxes has taken root in many countries.”

Monaghan noted that the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) “is now leading multilateral efforts to address the tax challenges from digitalization of the economy, and is looking to ensure that profitable multinationals pay tax wherever they have significant consumer-facing activities and generate their profits.”

Alex Cobham, chief executive of the London-based advocacy group Tax Justice Network, said that the group’s new report “demonstrates why we need a fundamental reprogramming of the world’s approach to tax, based on a unitary taxation.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Under a unitary taxation system, the global profits of multinational corporations would be allocated across the countries where the companies actually conduct business, which advocates argue would effectively make tax havens useless.

“When multinational corporations abuse their tax responsibilities to society, they weaken the supports that our economies need to work well and create wealth,” said Cobham. “A unitary approach to tax means we can finally make sure multinational corporations contribute tax based on where they employ workers and do business, not where they rent mailboxes and hide ledgers.”

“By ensuring multinational corporations pay their fair share locally for the wealth created locally by people’s work—based on an agreed formula and supplemented by a minimum effective tax rate—governments can strengthen their economies to run smoothly and make a good life possible for everyone,” he added.

by

ADVERTISEMENT

Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

GOP governors are refusing to do Trump’s bidding and ducking him on the campaign trail: report

Published

on

On Saturday, Maggie Haberman of The New York Times profiled how President Donald Trump is having less luck whipping Republican governors into line than Republican senators, including governors who arguably owe their election to his support.

"In Florida, Mr. Trump’s aides helped save the flailing candidacy of Ron DeSantis in the 2018 Republican primary, and then the general election," wrote Haberman. "Also last year, in Georgia, Mr. Trump helped pull Brian Kemp over the finish line in both the primary and the general election. In both cases, Mr. Trump’s advisers implored him to stay out of the primaries, and he agreed to — only to surprise his aides by jumping in to support Mr. DeSantis and Mr. Kemp."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Courts have avoided refereeing between Congress and the president — Trump may change all that

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s refusal to hand over records to Congress and allow executive branch employees to provide information and testimony to Congress during the impeachment battle is the strongest test yet of legal principles that over the past 200 years have not yet been fully defined by U.S. courts.

It’s not the first test: Struggles over power among the political branches predate our Constitution. The framers chose not to, and probably could not, fully resolve them.

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

Giuliani’s latest trip to Ukraine opened a new door for prosecutors to go after Trump: MSNBC analyst

Published

on

On MSNBC Saturday afternoon, legal analyst Danny Cevallos explained how Rudy Giuliani's trip to Ukraine to produce anti-impeachment propaganda could end up harming his legal position — by muddying attorney-client privilege with President Donald Trump.

"The only path to legitimacy is if there was a true corruption threat in Ukraine, and specifically if Hunter Biden and Burisma posed a true corruption threat," said Cevallos. "That is why Rudy Giuliani is in Ukraine. He's building that case. So that he can show, bring a news network there, right-leaning news network to do a documentary or investigate this issue and yield factual information that Rudy Giuliani can point to and say, this corruption, this evidence, these facts show that President trump was warranted in requesting an investigation, not generally into corruption, specifically into Hunter Biden. It's the only path that will work for Republicans that passes even remotely any kind of smell test. Even then, it's a bit of a stretch."

Continue Reading