Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump’s Treasury Dept. handed corporations billions more in tax breaks than even the president proposed: report

Published

on

U.S. companies expected to cash in when Republican Donald Trump became president in 2016 but, according to a New York Times report, they found they were able to achieve a massive windfall in tax savings totaling in the billions beyond their wildest dreams due to a very compliant Treasury Department.

According to the report, President Trump’s 2017 tax cut bill was expected to dramatically increase the fortunes of American corporations but, once passed, lobbyists found that certain provisions could be finessed by applying pressure on Treasury officials who were more than willing to listen.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But big companies wanted more — and, not long after the bill became law in December 2017, the Trump administration began transforming the tax package into a greater windfall for the world’s largest corporations and their shareholders. The tax bills of many big companies have ended up even smaller than what was anticipated when the president signed the bill,” the Times reports. “One consequence is that the federal government may collect hundreds of billions of dollars less over the coming decade than previously projected. The budget deficit has jumped more than 50 percent since Mr. Trump took office and is expected to top $1 trillion in 2020, partly as a result of the tax law.”

Reporting that in 2018, “senior officials in President Trump’s Treasury Department were swarmed by lobbyists seeking to insulate companies from the few parts of the tax law that would have required them to pay more,” the Times adds that, “The crush of meetings was so intense that some top Treasury officials had little time to do their jobs, according to two people familiar with the process.”

One key element of the Trump tax bill was a set of proposed major new taxes on companies who had avoided paying their fair share by claiming their profits were earned outside the United States.

Lobbyists for a “cross-section of the world’s largest companies, including Anheuser-Busch, Credit Suisse, General Electric, United Technologies, Barclays, Coca-Cola, Bank of America, UBS, IBM, Kraft Heinz, Kimberly-Clark, News Corporation, Chubb, ConocoPhillips, HSBC and the American International Group,” worked in concert to gut that provision.

“Through a series of obscure regulations, the Treasury carved out exceptions to the law that mean many leading American and foreign companies will owe little or nothing in new taxes on offshore profits, according to a review of the Treasury’s rules, government lobbying records, and interviews with federal policymakers and tax experts,’ the Times reports. “Companies were effectively let off the hook for tens if not hundreds of billions of taxes that they would have been required to pay.”

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Bret Wells, a tax law professor at the University of Houston, “Treasury is gutting the new law. It is largely the top 1 percent that will disproportionately benefit — the wealthiest people in the world.”

“It is the latest example of the benefits of the Republican tax package flowing disproportionately to the richest of the rich,” the report continues. “Even a tax break that was supposed to aid poor communities — an initiative called ‘opportunity zones’ — is being used in part to finance high-end developments in affluent neighborhoods, at times benefiting those with ties to the Trump administration.”

The Times also reports the gutting of the tax bill has only now become wholely apparent, noting, “Two years after the tax cuts became law, their impact is becoming clear. Companies continue to shift hundreds of billions of dollars to overseas tax havens, ensuring that huge sums of corporate profits remain out of reach of the United States government,” while adding that the IRS is taking in “tens of billions of dollars less in corporate taxes than Congress projected.”

ADVERTISEMENT

You can read more details here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Buffalo has a long history of protecting cops from criminal charges: report

Published

on

On Saturday, The Daily Beast documented the recent history of use of force in the Buffalo Police Department, which is reeling from controversy as two officers face assault charges for shoving a 75-year-old protester to the ground.

"As shocking as this all may be to outsiders, the shoving of demonstrator Martin Gugino and the defiant response of officers to an effort to discipline two of their own is indicative of the state of police affairs in Buffalo," wrote Jim Heaney. "Has been for a long time, not that you have to go back too far to find other episodes of brutality that have been captured on video."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Internet disgusted after Buffalo first responders cheer cops charged with assaulting 75-year-old protester

Published

on

Commenters on Twitter expressed both contempt and disgust for Buffalo firefighters and police officers who turned out in front of Buffalo City Court to support two suspended police officers with applause and cheering.

Moments after officers Aaron Torglaski and Robert McCabe were charged with second-degree assault and then released without having to post bail, they were greeted as heroes outside the courthouse.

After a video was posted showing the celebration, commenters on Twitter vented at cops and firefighters for defending the two officers who assaulted the 75-year-old man who had to be rushed to a hospital after they shoved him to the ground where he sustained a head injury.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Donald Trump’s lurch toward fascism is backfiring spectacularly

Published

on

Welcome to another edition of What Fresh Hell?, Raw Story’s roundup of news items that might have become controversies under another regime, but got buried – or were at least under-appreciated – due to the daily firehose of political pratfalls, unhinged tweet storms and other sundry embarrassments coming out of the current White House.

During the 2016 campaign, as Donald Trump railed against "Mexican rapists" and other "criminal aliens," pollsters found that the share of Americans who said that immigrants worked hard and made a positive contribution to our society increased significantly, and noticed a similar decline in the share who said they take citizens' jobs and burden our social safety net. After Trump was elected and began pursuing his Muslim ban, the share of respondents who held a positive view of Islam also increased pretty dramatically. I'm not aware of any polling of the general public about transgender troops serving in the military before Trump decided to discharge them, but Gallup found that 71 percent of respondents opposed his position after he did.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image