Quantcast
Connect with us

Vigils held for victims of London Bridge terror attack

Published

on

Tributes were paid on Monday to victims of the London Bridge terror attack, as the government said it was reviewing the early release from prison of dozens of convicted terrorists.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson, the main opposition Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn and London Mayor Sadiq Khan all joined a vigil to honor Jack Merritt, 25, and 23-year-old Saskia Jones.

ADVERTISEMENT

They were both killed on Friday when Usman Khan, who was wearing a fake suicide device, went on a knife rampage before being shot dead by armed police.

Khan, 28, had been released early from a 16-year prison sentence for an Al-Qaeda-inspired plot to attack central London after being deemed to no longer be a risk to the public.

The incident has provoked questions about legislation, and triggered accusations that the government was seeking to make political capital from the tragedy before a general election.

The memorial event in the City of London financial district, a short distance from the scene of the attack, involved members of the emergency services and the public.

Mayor Khan told them: “The best way to defeat this hatred is not by turning on one another but by focusing on the values that bind us.”

ADVERTISEMENT

People should “take hope from the heroism of ordinary Londoners and our emergency services who ran towards danger, risking their lives to help people they didn’t even know”.

“It is also by drawing inspiration from Jack and Saskia, who from an early age chose to dedicate themselves to helping others,” he added.

A minute’s silence was also held in Cambridge, where the two victims were university graduates, and were working on a prisoner rehabilitation scheme that Khan had attended.

ADVERTISEMENT

Among those at the Cambridge vigil was Merritt’s girlfriend Leanne O’Brien, who broke down in tears and clutched a cuddly toy.

– Political fallout –

ADVERTISEMENT

Johnson has ordered the security services to step up monitoring of convicted terrorists released early, saying the cases of 74 individuals were being scrutinized.

As part of the review, the West Midlands Counter-Terrorism Unit in central England said officers had arrested a 34-year-old man “on suspicion of preparation of terrorist acts”.

British media identified the man as Nazam Hussain, who was jailed with Khan in 2012 and also released early after successfully appealing against his original indeterminate sentence.

ADVERTISEMENT

West Midlands Police said the man had been “recalled to prison due to a suspected breach of his licence conditions”.

The Daily Telegraph newspaper said a number of convicted terrorists could be returned to prison within days.

The Metropolitan Police said a 23-year-old man was arrested in north London on Sunday “on suspicion of breaching notification requirements under the Counter-Terrorism Act 2008”.

Scotland Yard said the arrest “was not linked in any way to the London Bridge terror attack”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Johnson, however, has criticised the 2008 legislation and said he would introduce minimum 14-year sentences if he is returned to office after polls on December 12.

His governing Conservatives have traditionally portrayed themselves as the party of law and order.

But Merritt’s family has warned against a knee-jerk reaction to his death.

“We know Jack would not want this terrible, isolated incident to be used as a pretext by the government for introducing even more draconian sentences on prisoners, or for detaining people in prison for longer than necessary,” they said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Justice minister Robert Buckland told BBC radio he was meeting officials on Monday to review the licence conditions of every convicted terrorist released from prison.

Buckland said it would also look at those “about to be released and also a wider group who weren’t convicted of terrorism offenses but who present an extremist risk”.

Buckland said any prisoner on early release had been stopped from going to events similar to the rehabilitation conference attended by Usman Khan near London Bridge on Friday.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump announces Rudy Giuliani ‘wants to go before Congress’ and testify about his Ukraine dealings

Published

on

President Donald Trump on Saturday said that his personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, wanted to testify before Congress.

Speaking to reporters as he departed for a Republican fundraiser in Florida, Trump praised the former New York City mayor.

"Rudy, as you know, has been one of the great crime fighters of the last 50 years," Trump said of his lawyer, who is reportedly under federal investigation for breaking the law.

"And, he did get back from Europe just recently and I know -- he has not told me what he found, but I think he wants to go before Congress and say, and also to the attorney general and the Department of Justice," Trump said.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

GOP governors are refusing to do Trump’s bidding and ducking him on the campaign trail: report

Published

on

On Saturday, Maggie Haberman of The New York Times profiled how President Donald Trump is having less luck whipping Republican governors into line than Republican senators, including governors who arguably owe their election to his support.

"In Florida, Mr. Trump’s aides helped save the flailing candidacy of Ron DeSantis in the 2018 Republican primary, and then the general election," wrote Haberman. "Also last year, in Georgia, Mr. Trump helped pull Brian Kemp over the finish line in both the primary and the general election. In both cases, Mr. Trump’s advisers implored him to stay out of the primaries, and he agreed to — only to surprise his aides by jumping in to support Mr. DeSantis and Mr. Kemp."

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Courts have avoided refereeing between Congress and the president — Trump may change all that

Published

on

President Donald Trump’s refusal to hand over records to Congress and allow executive branch employees to provide information and testimony to Congress during the impeachment battle is the strongest test yet of legal principles that over the past 200 years have not yet been fully defined by U.S. courts.

It’s not the first test: Struggles over power among the political branches predate our Constitution. The framers chose not to, and probably could not, fully resolve them.

Continue Reading