Quantcast
Connect with us

Dispute over former Pope Benedict’s role in controversial book

Published

on

The Vatican was gripped Tuesday by a dispute over whether elderly ex-pope Benedict XVI was being used by the Catholic Church’s ultra-conservative wing to undermine his successor Pope Francis.

At least three Vatican correspondents cited a source close to Benedict saying the former pontiff had not co-authored a controversial book with a conservative cardinal.

ADVERTISEMENT

When France’s Le Figaro newspaper published extracts of the book on Sunday, it was presented as a collaboration between Benedict and the ultra-conservative Cardinal Robert Sarah.

Benedict was quoted in the book saying he “cannot keep silent” about the divisive issue of whether or not to allow married men to become Catholic priests — and coming down firmly against it.

Francis is currently considering allowing it in remote locations, such as the Amazon, where communities seldom have Mass due to a lack of priests. He is expected to publish his decision in the coming weeks.

Vatican experts expressed astonishment that the retired pope would speak out on such a sensitive topic.

But sources late Monday threw doubt on the extent of Benedict’s collaboration with Cardinal Sarah, raising questions as to whether the 92-year old pope emeritus was being exploited.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Benedict XVI… never saw, nor authorised the cover, nor did he authorise the publication of a co-authored book,” a Vatican source “very close” to the former pope told Elisabetta Pique, Vatican correspondent for Argentina’s La Nacion.

“It’s clearly an editorial and media op, from which Benedict distances himself,” said the source, who asked not to be named.

Benedict had merely shared his notes on celibacy with the cardinal, the source added.

ADVERTISEMENT

Two other Vatican correspondents also cited sources close to Benedict denying he co-authored it.

– ‘Attacks’ –

ADVERTISEMENT

Cardinal Sarah took to Twitter to “solemnly affirm that Benedict XVI knew that our project would take the form of a book”.

“We exchanged several proofs to make the corrections,” he said, before publishing three letters written by the former pope.

In one, Benedict writes that “the text can be published in the manner you suggested” — without, however, specifying if that was a book.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Attacks seem to imply a lie on my part. These slanders are exceptionally serious,” Sarah said.

He later issued a statement affirming his “affection” for Benedict and “obedience” to Pope Francis.

The book, set to be published Wednesday in France, features an essay by Benedict and another by Sarah, with a co-authored introduction and conclusion. It has both the former pope and cardinal on the cover.

“No-one is doubting that Benedict agrees with the premise of the book — to retain clerical celibacy for the Latin rite priesthood,” said Vatican expert Christopher Lamb.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The question is the use of a retired pope’s authority to make the point.”

Nicolas Seneze of the French Catholic daily La Croix reported a flurry of exchanges Monday between Benedict’s abode and Francis’s, “where the danger of a book that erects the pope emeritus as a parallel magisterium (Catholic authority) was clearly understood”.

Joshua McElwee of the US-based National Catholic Reporter said it was “unclear from these texts if Benedict meant to share an essay or an entire book”.

Italian daily Repubblica also weighed in on the controversy.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the former monastery in the Vatican gardens, Benedict’s home since becoming the first pontiff to resign in almost 600 years, the fear was “that the emeritus pope has been used without his knowledge”, it reported.

It warned of “the real risk that there are those… who use Benedict to advance their own battles”.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

White House adviser warned colleagues Nancy Pelosi would eventually bring Trump down: ‘She’s an assassin’

Published

on

In an excerpt from the new book "A Very Stable Genius," former Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon predicted that now-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi would eventually attempt to bring the president down one way or the other.

According to Axios, the book states, "The night of January 23 [2017], the first Monday of his presidency, Trump came face?to?face with House and Senate leaders from both parties at a White House reception ... At a long table in the State Dining Room, Steve Bannon ... could not stop looking at Nancy Pelosi..."

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

‘Dopes and babies!’ Trump unleashed expletive-filled rant at military leaders after growing bored in Pentagon meeting: report

Published

on

President Donald Trump erupted during a briefing intended to teach him the basic fundamentals of U.S. foreign policy -- and essentially ended any hope that he would ever learn them.

Six months into his presidency, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, Director of the National Economic Council Gary Cohn and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson were frustrated and alarmed by the gaps in Trump's knowledge of world affairs, and they scheduled a Pentagon briefing to catch him up, reported the Washington Post.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Rick Santorum flattened by CNN’s Berman after calling Parnas bombshell revelations ‘extraneous’ to impeachment

Published

on

Rick Santorum and CNN's John Berman got into a frantic back-and-forth on Friday morning after the former Republican senator attempted to dismiss the revelations by former Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas as something that should not be submitted as evidence in the impeachment trial of Donald Trump.

Discussing the Senate trial expected to start next week, Santorum said the only testimony and witnesses that should be allowed are ones that came up in the earlier House hearings.

"The House's responsibility to bring to us a case," Santorum stated. "They're the one who is said these are offenses that are worthy of the president being removed from office; here is the record, here are the charges. The Senate didn't impeach, the House did, so we are going to look at the record the House presented us. We're going to look at the witnesses and say are there are questions that we have for the people that brought this case forward and relied on these witnesses and look at their testimony."

Continue Reading
 
 
Help Raw Story Uncover Injustice. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1 and go ad-free.
close-image