Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump just started the new year with a dangerous new push

Published

on

- Commentary
Thanks for your support!
This article was paid for by reader donations to Raw Story Investigates.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.

Terry H. Schwadron
Terry H. Schwadron

The new year for White House anti-immigration efforts has run into an early obstacle—a federal appeals court has temporarily blocked the newly announced Trump administration policy easing the way to deny legal status to immigrants who use any publicly funded benefit, like health or food stamps.

In a brief order last week, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan denied the Trump administration’s bid to allow the program to proceed. Previously there had been a federal injunction against its implementation.

ADVERTISEMENT

But it all means is that the government must hold off from enforcement until a full hearing can be held beginning next month. But while the New York circuit ordered the temporary halt to enforcing Donald Trump’s rule changes, appeals courts in other states have ruled the opposite way, making for conflict that probably ensures a Supreme Court review.

While the New York circuit ordered the temporary halt to enforcing Donald Trump’s rule changes, appeals courts in other states have ruled the opposite way, making for conflict that probably ensures a Supreme Court review.

The Department of Homeland Security has called anyone using cash assistance or government-funded institutional care as a “public charge.”  The rule change sought by the administration said that immigrants who are labeled a “public charge,” could be denied green cards, visas and other forms of legal immigration status.

But that’s just one of several issues the White House is juggling as the anti-immigrant campaign moves into the new year.

‘Protecting’ Taxpayers

As NBC News outlined, the new rule expands the definition to include additional benefits such as food stamps, non-emergency Medicaid, certain prescription drug subsidies and housing vouchers. It says that any immigrant household, not necessarily individual, who uses or is deemed likely to use one public benefit for 12 months during a 36-month period as a target. Receipt of two public benefits in one month counts as two months, the rule noted.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Trump administration argues that expanding the meaning of “public charge” helps “protect American taxpayers” and ensures “that noncitizens in this country are self-sufficient and not a strain on public resources.  Critics say it would disproportionately impact lower income immigrants and immigrants of color.

A statement by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, part of the Department of Homeland Security, that the “public charge inadmissibility rule enforces long-standing immigration law that Congress reaffirmed in 1996.”

‘Dangerous and Discriminatory’ Change

The opponents’ legal team for Make the Road New York, The Legal Aid Society and the Center for Constitutional Rights issued a competing statement that “the court rejected the Trump administration’s claims that it cannot wait to implement its dangerous and discriminatory public charge policy change.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Justice Department declined to comment.

U.S. District Judge George Daniels, of the Southern District of New York, set the injunction on enforcement in October. At the time, he wrote, “It is a rule that will punish individuals for their receipt of benefits provided by our government, and discourages them from lawfully receiving available assistance intended to aid them in becoming contributing members of our society.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Southern Border Numbers Down

Meanwhile, the number of migrants taken into custody along the U.S.-Mexico border has started to level off after several months of decline, according to border enforcement statistics, according to the Customs and Border Protection service. The number of people apprehended or deemed “inadmissible” along the southern border fell to 40,620 last month, down 72% from May, when the Trump administration declared it was at the height of a border crisis.

Of course, much of this has resulted from forcing migrants who pass through a third country, like Guatemala or Mexico, to be returned to that third country, where they are waiting for months for a change to make appeals for entry to the United States.

The Associated Press reports that the White House is considering expanding its much-challenged travel ban to additional countries this year, though it has yet to name the new, presumably Muslim-majority nations that may be added, all based on sources in the White House. The move would be timed to coincide with the third anniversary of Trump’s January 2017 executive order.

ADVERTISEMENT

Green Card Backlog

At the same time, the new year is seeing an estimated 800,000 immigrants who are working legally in the United States are waiting for a green card, an unprecedented backlog in employment-based immigration. There is a relatively quiet policy debate underway that has been overshadowed by the border wall fight and issues related to enforcement on the border.

It turns out that most of those waiting for employment-based green cards that would allow them to stay in the United States permanently are Indian nationals. And the backlog among this group is so acute that an Indian national who applies for a green card now can expect to wait up to 50 years to get one. The wait is largely the result of an annual quota unchanged since 1990 and per-country limits enacted decades before the tech boom made India the top source of employment-based green card seekers.

There are competing bills in Congress to deal with this, but lack of consensus has halted any comprehensive approach to immigration. The backlog has become a serious issue for business, of course, who fear that prized employees may simply go elsewhere.

The new year has brought along various new rules in the administration’s continuing campaign to stop both legal and illegal immigration.

ADVERTISEMENT

There are, for example, new cost hikes for key immigration processes, The Miami Herald reports. Citizenship and Immigration Services plans fee hikes of 83% for naturalization, from $640 to $1,170, for example. They also want to charge asylum seekers $50 for an application, thus becoming one of four countries around the world to charge for humanitarian protection.
In another new rule, the administration plans to modify regulations that would increase the waiting period to apply for employment authorization, denying the permits to asylum applicants who entered the United States illegally, terminating the permit immediately if the asylum application is denied, and removing the 30-day deadline for rulings on permit applications.

The anti-immigration program is hale and hearty.

This article was paid for by Raw Story subscribers. Not a subscriber? Try us and go ad-free for $1. Prefer to give a one-time tip? Click here.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Furious Trump grilling aides on how impeachment is playing with voters: report

Published

on

According to a report in the New York Times, a furious Donald Trump spent Thursday afternoon huddled with close White House aides worrying how voters are reacting to his impeachment as it heads to a Senate trial.

Following an afternoon where he tweeted about how unfair the impeachment process has been ( “I JUST GOT IMPEACHED FOR MAKING A PERFECT PHONE CALL!” he wrote) -- and snapping at reporters -- the Times reports the president later bunkered down with staffers to discuss what to do next.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

The Trump administration misled the country by saying there were ‘no casualties’ from Iran attack: report

Published

on

After Iran targeted missiles at U.S. military personnel in Iraq in retaliation for the kill of a top general, the Trump administration declared that there were no casualties from attack, and — at least for the time being — it allowed the conflict to de-escalate.

But on Thursday night, a new report from Defense One revealed the initial claim that there were “no casualties” from the attack was false. It reported that 11 U.S. troops were injured in the attack and taken to hospitals to be treated for “traumatic brain injury.”

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

State of emergency: High tension in Virginia as right-wing gun fanatics descend on Richmond

Published

on

Buried under the cascade of serious national news Wednesday was the alarming story that Gov. Ralph Northam of Virginia had declared a state of emergency through next Tuesday evening in Richmond, the state capital. The declaration includes a ban on firearms and other weapons near Capitol Square, where the Democratic-led state legislature meets. Monday is a scheduled "lobbying day" for the Virginia Citizens Defense League, a far right pro-gun group, and Northam's office announced that law enforcement has "identified credible threats of violence surrounding the event, along with white nationalist rhetoric and plans by out-of-state militia groups to attend."

Continue Reading