Quantcast
Connect with us

White House, wrapping up Trump defense, seeks swift acquittal

Published

on

US President Donald Trump’s lawyers were to wrap up their defense at his Senate impeachment trial on Tuesday but their hopes for a swift acquittal may be in jeopardy amid calls for more witnesses.

Democrats want former national security advisor John Bolton to testify about Trump’s dealings with Ukraine and there are growing indications that enough Republican senators may support the demand.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think it’s increasingly likely that other Republicans will join those of us who think we should hear from John Bolton,” said Utah Senator Mitt Romney, one of the few Republicans who has dared to publicly criticize Trump and risk his Twitter ire in the past.

Calling Bolton, and potentially other witnesses, to testify could prolong the historic trial and torpedo efforts by the White House and Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell to bring the proceedings to a close by the end of this week.

Trump is to deliver the nationally televised “State of the Union” speech to a joint session of Congress on February 4 and the White House clearly wants to have moved past impeachment by then.

Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer accused the White House and McConnell on Tuesday of seeking a “very short and incredibly rushed trial.”

AFP/File / Brendan Smialowski Democrats are seeking the testimony of former national security advisor John Bolton at President Donald Trump’s Senate impeachment trial

“Because the longer it goes on, the more likely that new evidence and more new evidence will come out that further implicates the president,” Schumer said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bolton is looming large over the trial after The New York Times reported that an upcoming book by the 71-year-old foreign policy hawk contains revelations that could harm Trump’s defense.

According to the Times, Bolton says in the book that Trump told him in August that he wanted to freeze military aid to Ukraine until Kiev opens an investigation into political rival Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who served on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma.

The accusation that the funds were withheld for Trump’s own political purposes was at the heart of his December 18 impeachment by the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

ADVERTISEMENT

– 16 hours of questions –

Trump’s lawyers were to conclude their defense of the president before the 100 members of the Senate beginning at 1:00 pm (1800 GMT).

ADVERTISEMENT

GETTY IMAGES/AFP/File / MARIO TAMA Harvard constitutional expert Alan Dershowitz argued that the House case against the president amounted to a congressional power grab

Once they wrap up, senators will have 16 hours to pose questions to White House lawyers and the seven members of the House who have served as prosecutors at just the third impeachment trial of a president in US history.

The questions will be submitted in writing to US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who is presiding over the trial and will read them aloud.

After that, the Senate is expected to debate whether witnesses should be subpoenaed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Democrats will make the case that Bolton should appear while Republicans may demand the testimony of Hunter Biden or perhaps even that of his father, the former vice president who is seeking to challenge Trump in November’s presidential election.

US Senate TV/AFP / HO Ken Starr, whose investigation led to the impeachment of president Bill Clinton, defends President Donald Trump at his Senate impeachment trial

Four Republicans would need to join Democrats in the Senate, where Republicans hold a 53-47 edge, to allow testimony from Bolton and others.

While just 51 senators are required to allow trial witnesses, 67 senators — a two-thirds majority — are needed to remove Trump from office and despite some cracks in the Republican ranks he does not appear in any serious danger at the moment.

– Power grab –

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump’s lawyers launched a concerted attack on the Bidens on Monday, arguing that the president’s demand that they be investigated was motivated by concerns about corruption not personal political gain.

The White House also rolled out two high-profile lawyers to defend the president — Clinton impeachment investigator Ken Starr and Harvard constitutional expert Alan Dershowitz.

AFP / Jonathan WALTER John Bolton

Dershowitz, who has made a career defending unpopular positions and controversial clients — O.J. Simpson and Jeffrey Epstein to name just two — argued that the House case against the president was “unconstitutional” and amounted to a congressional power grab.

He also sought to neutralize the Bolton developments. “Nothing in the Bolton revelations, even if true, would rise to the level of abuse of power or impeachable offense,” Dershowitz said.

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump attacked his former advisor, whom he fired in September, tweeting that he “NEVER told John Bolton that the aid to Ukraine was tied to investigations into Democrats” and suggested Bolton was making the allegations “only to sell a book.”

Starr, whose exhaustive investigation led to the 1998 impeachment of president Bill Clinton for perjury for lying about his sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky, lamented that the Senate was being called “all too frequently” to try impeachments.


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Here are 11 of the most popular progressive policies for candidates to run on — and 5 of the least popular

Published

on

New polling from the progressive pollster Data for Progress, described in a new piece Monday at Vox, points the way forward for Democrats looking to oust President Donald Trump from the White House and enact a liberal policy agenda.

Progressives often argue that their plans are broadly popular with Americans, and that these ideas are only prevented from becoming reality because of an obstinate Republican Party weaponizing racism and misinformation, archaic political institutions that stymie significant efforts at reform, and corruption across the two parties that allows special and corporate interests to undermine the popular will. And there is a fair amount of truth in this idea — some progressive idea are remarkably popular, and there's no good reason they haven't been implemented yet.

Continue Reading

Facebook

Coronavirus forces fan ban at Italian football games

Published

on

Upcoming matches in Italian Serie A and the Europa League will be played behind closed doors to combat the spread of coronavirus, the Italian sports minister announced on Monday evening.

"Following the demands of the sports world and knowing that the ban on sporting events open to the public remains in force in six regions of northern Italy, we have agreed to the holding of matches behind closed doors," said Sports Minister Vincenzo Spadafora after a meeting of the Council of Ministers.

Inter Milan themselves announced their Europa League match with Ludogorets on Thursday would be played with no fans present.

Continue Reading
 

Facebook

‘Unconscionable’: Fury as federal appeals court upholds Trump’s anti-women, anti-choice “gag rule”

Published

on

"Leaving women in the dark about their healthcare and restricting doctors from providing candid advice is simply not in the best interest of public health."

Women's healthcare advocates fumed Monday after a federal appeals court upheld the Trump-Pence administration's so-called domestic "gag rule."

The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals handed down the 7-4 decision regarding the administration's policy of preventing Title X funds from going to clinics that provide referrals for abortions, even though no federal funds pay for abortions.

Continue Reading
 
 
close-image