After being acquitted in his impeachment trial in early 1999, President Bill Clinton made a point of appearing contrite — even though his approval ratings were soaring. But President Donald Trump, on the other hand, has been more arrogant than ever following his February 5 acquittal in the U.S. Senate on two articles of impeachment. And New York Times reporter Peter Baker, in an article published on February 11, examines some of the ways in which post-impeachment Trump is taking revenge on what he considers “the Deep State.”
“This is an unsettled time in Mr. Trump’s Washington,” Baker explains. “In the days since he was acquitted in a Senate trial, an aggrieved and unbound president has sought to even the scales, as he sees it. Col. Vindman was abruptly marched by security out of the White House, an ambassador who also testified in the House hearings was summarily dismissed, and senior Justice Department officials on Tuesday intervened on behalf of Mr. Trump’s convicted friend, Roger J. Stone, Jr., leading four career prosecutors to quit the case.”
The firing of Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman and his twin brother, Yevgeny Vindman, from the National Security Council (NSC) as well as the firing of Gordon Sondland as U.S. ambassador to Ukraine — all on Friday, February 7 — has been called the Friday Night Massacre, an obvious comparison to President Richard Nixon’s infamous Saturday Night Massacre of 1973. And these firings underscore Trump’s appetite for revenge: he is still furious that Alexander Vindman and Sondland testified during House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry in 2019.
Last year, Stone (a Trump ally and veteran GOP operative) was convicted in federal court on charges ranging from lying to Congress to obstruction of justice to witness tampering. And on Monday, February 10, the DOJ issued a sentencing memo that recommended a federal prison sentence of seven to nine years. But after Trump posted an angry tweet attacking the DOJ for that recommendation, a new sentencing memo was released the following day — one recommending a much more lenient sentence for Stone.
This is a horrible and very unfair situation. The real crimes were on the other side, as nothing happens to them. Cannot allow this miscarriage of justice! https://t.co/rHPfYX6Vbv
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 11, 2020
Baker notes that Trump has been railing against Judge Amy Berman Jackson, the Barack Obama appointee who will be sentencing Stone. Jackson, as a judge, has discretion when it comes to sentencing; so, it remains to be seen whether she will give Stone the longer sentence the DOJ recommended on February 10 or the more lenient sentence it recommended on February 11.
Is this the Judge that put Paul Manafort in SOLITARY CONFINEMENT, something that not even mobster Al Capone had to endure? How did she treat Crooked Hillary Clinton? Just asking! https://t.co/Fe7XkepJNN
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 12, 2020
According to Baker, the “war between Mr. Trump and what he calls the Deep State” has “entered a new, more volatile phase as the president seeks to assert greater control over a government that he is convinced is not sufficiently loyal to him.” And that “war,” Baker stresses, will only escalate in the days ahead.
“More axes are sure to fall,” Baker reports. “A senior Pentagon official appears in danger of losing her nomination to a top Defense Department post after questioning the president’s suspension of aid to Ukraine. Likewise, a prosecutor involved in Mr. Stone’s case has lost a nomination to a senior Treasury Department position.”
Moreover, Baker adds, “A key National Security Council official is said by colleagues to face dismissal. And the last of dozens of career officials being transferred out of the White House may be gone by the end of the week.”
Here are 3 winners and 3 losers from the 2020 Democratic presidential primary debate
Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg joined the other leading Democratic presidential primary candidates Wednesday night in the fieriest evening of the race so far.
His presence on the stage drew fire from the other candidates, but it also seemed to change the overall tone of the debate, with more attacks, counter-attacks, and passion than was generally seen earlier in the campaign.
Here’s a (necessarily subjective!) list of the winners and losers from the fray:
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) — Warren hit her stride right as the debate started by attacking Bloomberg for his record on the mistreatment of women, racist policies, and his tax returns. She repeatedly came back to skewer the former mayor, making herself the biggest and most notable presence in the debate. But importantly, she also continuously brought the discussion back to the issues she cares about — like expanding health care, environmental justice, and consumer protection — while getting in digs at the other candidates on the stage.
Michael Bloomberg ‘lost everything’ in Las Vegas: MSNBC analyst
Senior editor for "The Root," Jason Johnson, concluded that the biggest loser of the Democratic debate in Las Vegas Wednesday was Michael Bloomberg, but not merely because of his debate performance.
"The big new name was going to be Michael Bloomberg," he said. "This was probably the most expensive night in Vegas I've ever seen. He lost everything. This guy has spent $320 million. He had the opportunity to stand on stage, and appear to be an equal, and he looked bored. He looked disenchanted. He stumbled over obvious questions that anybody would have anticipated about sexual harassment and stop and frisk. I thought it was a bad night for him."
Pro-immigration protesters interrupt Joe Biden’s closing statement at debate
Former Vice President Joe Biden's closing statement was interrupted by protesters at Thursday night's Democratic presidential debate.
As Biden began his remarks, demonstrators began shouting about the Obama administration's record on deportations.
— NBC News (@NBCNews) February 20, 2020