Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump’s latest healthcare push would be a massive gift to Silicon Valley — and could destroy your privacy rights

Published

on

The tech industry and Silicon Valley have been lobbying the Trump Administration for policy changes that, they argue, would make it easier for patients in the U.S. to download their medical records onto their smartphones. But this change, journalists Arius Tahir and Adam Cancryn report in Politico, has privacy advocates worried that the privacy of millions of patients could be seriously compromised.

ADVERTISEMENT

“If proposed policy changes go through, patients would be able to download their health records onto their smartphones and direct it to apps of their choice,” Tahir and Cancryn explain. “But there’s a major privacy pitfall: as soon as those records leave the software system of the doctor or hospital, they are no longer protected by HIPAA, the landmark medical privacy law.”

HIPAA stands for the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996.

The changes that Silicon Valley has been pushing for, according to Tahir and Cancryn, “might allow for unprecedented convenience, letting patients more easily share data for a second opinion or enabling a researcher to find participants for a clinical trial. But it also opens up a Wild West of data sharing on the most intimate health care details for millions of Americans. ”

White House Senior Adviser Jared Kushner has been a major proponent of the proposed change, which Tahir and Cancryn note could “upend the health technology sector and generate a windfall for Silicon Valley giants and startups alike.” But Epic, known for health care software, has been expressing privacy concerns and filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

“Central to Epic’s argument are privacy fears,” Tahir and Cancryn observe. “And privacy and consumer advocates, hospitals and health systems are divided. Some agree the privacy challenges haven’t been thought through; others believe Epic is opportunistically trying to protect its market dominance.”

ADVERTISEMENT

According to the Politico reporters, “Privacy hawks see an ironic threat: giving patients more control over their health data will ultimately result in them losing that very control. Once data is shared, privacy restrictions become looser, supercharging a burgeoning industry built on vacuuming up and reselling Americans’ medical information.”

Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, told Politico, “This is not about interoperability; this is about having access to data. The health data is going to give them insights into many other aspects of your life.”


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

New evidence shows Trump—who says he knew Covid-19 was ‘going to be horrible’—allowed exports of crucial supplies to continue

Published

on

While countries in Europe and Asia spent the first several weeks of the year preparing their healthcare systems and populations for the coronavirus outbreak by stockpiling crucial medical supplies, the Trump administration spent that same time sending dozens of medical shipments overseas as President Donald Trump denied the coronavirus would have much of an impact on the United States.

As The Intercept reported Wednesday, while the new coronavirus ravaged countries including China, Italy, and Iran in February and early March, U.S. manufacturers were sending large shipments of respirators, ventilators, and protective medical equipment to Germany, Belgium, and Japan.

Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Trump ignored White House economists’ warning of devastating impact of pandemic months ago: report

Published

on

White House economists released a study last year that warned a pandemic could kill 500,000 people and devastate the economy months before the coronavirus outbreak, but top officials and the president appear to have ignored their warning.

A study by the Council of Economic Advisers ordered by the National Security Council predicted that a pandemic similar to the 1918 Spanish flu or the 2009 swine flu could lead to a half-million deaths and cost the economy as much as $3.8 trillion.

Continue Reading
 

Breaking Banner

Rural communities with few coronavirus cases will get rapid-test kits over larger areas — White House decides: report

Published

on

Large cities are exploding with coronavirus cases, but the White House has decided that the rapid testing machines should be sent somewhere else.

According to the Washington Post, "some White House officials want to ship many of the tests, which were approved Friday and can deliver results in five to 13 minutes, to areas where there are fewer cases, such as rural states and parts of the South."

But officials in hard-hit and more populated states need help now and are quickly running out of resources.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image