Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump’s ploy to get Michael Flynn off the hook could blow up in his face right before the election: columnist

Published

on

Writing for the Daily Beast, columnist David Lurie stated the attempt by Donald Trump and Attorney General Bill Barr to let former adviser Michael Flynn walk after pleading guilty to lying to FBI investigators stands a good chance of blowing up in the president’s face.

According to Lurie, Barr and Trump picked the wrong judge when they pushed to have Flynn’s case dismissed when it was in the final stage.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s a bad idea to try holding a show trial when the judge is not in your pocket but that’s what Trump consigliere William Barr did when his Department of Justice filed a motion to dismiss its own case against twice-admitted felon and former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn,” Lurie wrote before adding, ” While Trump will doubtlessly succeed in protecting Flynn from going to prison, he could do so at the cost of either a drawn-out court battle that will tortuously expose the mendacious nature of the DOJ’s effort to undermine the Russia investigation, or the issuance of a pardon amounting an admission of what the world already knows: that he’s letting a guilty crony off.”

“But Barr’s plans to begin his “Obamagate” roll-out with the Flynn motion depended on the trial court making no inquiries whatsoever into the veracity of the government’s new claims about Flynn’s innocence, and about the FBI’s and Mueller prosecutors’ supposed evil doings. And that is where the judge presiding over the case, Emmett Sullivan, has shown himself to be, quite predictably, uncooperative,” Lurie explained. “Sullivan, who gained notoriety for uncovering gross misconduct in the corruption prosecution of Republican Alaska Senator Ted Stevens, is well-known for holding the government to its proof in criminal cases. In fact, during 2018, Sullivan ordered the first of what turned out to be many delays in Flynn’s sentencing because he was concerned that Mueller’s prosecutors might have been too lenient in their treatment of Flynn, who was then a cooperating witness. “

Noting that Sullivan brought in another judge to take a hard look at the Justice Department’s proposal — one who doesn’t answer to Barr — Luris suggested it could open up a whole new can of worms for the Trump administration with regard to special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of the president.

“The DOJ made plain from the outset that it would have no tolerance for such an inquiry, declaring that the Executive Branch has plenary authority to decide whether or not to dismiss a criminal case in the absence of objection from the defense, even after the defendant has pleaded guilty,” he explained, before adding that, should the Justice Department’s case be swept away, “Trump and Barr will be placed in quite a difficult position.”

“Instead of getting a quick decision rubber-stamping the DOJ’s claim that Flynn, and, derivatively, Trump himself, were the victims of grave unfairness by biased law enforcement officers in Obama’s and Biden’s thrall, the president and Flynn will be forced to endure a potentially lengthy inquiry into Barr’s very flimsy justification for the DOJ’s about-face,” Lurie elaborated. “At the least, it seems increasingly likely that the transcripts of Flynn’s calls with the ambassador, which the DOJ successfully prevented the court from ordering to be released in the past, will finally see the light of day.”

ADVERTISEMENT

“Furthermore, the law enforcement personnel that the DOJ defamed, and apparently misrepresented, in its motion papers are also likely to be heard from. Even Flynn’s former, and highly skilled, defense counsel, whom Flynn now effectively (and absurdly) accuses of contributing to his supposed railroading, were ordered to appear again in the court, and may be called upon to provide evidence,” wrote before adding, “In short, the motion to dismiss the Flynn case is shaping up to be a disaster for Trump waiting to happen. Furthermore, it is one that could play out over the next several crucial months leading up to the election.”

You can read more here (subscription required).


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump accused by ex-Defense Secretary of putting US on ‘the trail toward a dictatorship’

Published

on

During an appearance on CNN on Friday morning, former Defense Secretary William Cohen - who also served in the U.S. Senate as a Republican -- denounced Donald Trump in no uncertain terms, saying his use of military personnel against anti-police brutality protesters is a sign he has set the country on the path to a dictatorship.

To emphasize his point, he later called Trump the "dictator-in-chief."

Speaking with host Jim Sciutto, Cohen didn't mince words after the CNN host noted that the president and his former attorney called the protesters "terrorists."

"What does it mean for you to hear a sitting president dismissing a whole range of protesters, who in fact were largely peaceful around the White House, dismissing a whole range of them as terrorists? What does that mean to you?" the CNN host asked.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Trump ‘crossed the line’ with the military this week — leading retired officers to revolt: former general

Published

on

Appearing on CNN's New Day with host John Berman, retired Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute explained that Donald Trump finally went a bridge too far this week with retired military officials when his administration deployed military police to turn on peaceful protesters in a Washington D.C. park.

Speaking with the host, Lute -- who also served as U.S. ambassador to NATO -- said tension between the president and military officials has gradually increased over the past three and a half years, but that the past week's incidents led to a "tipping point."

After host Berman read off a list of high profile ex-military officials who have either criticized Trump or defended their former colleagues from attacks from the president, Lute was asked what had changed.

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Trump is bleeding support from the only voters who have stuck with him since 2016

Published

on

President Donald Trump is losing support from his evangelical base as he lurches from one crisis into another.

Numerous polls show that religious Americans, like most other Americans, disapprove of the president's performance, and that could imperil his re-election chances, reported the New York Times.

Nearly 80 percent of white evangelicals -- a group that's already shrinking as a share of the electorate -- approved of Trump's performance in March, but his handling of the coronavirus pandemic has bled 15 points from their support, according to a new poll from Public Religion Research Institute.

Continue Reading
 
 
You need honest news coverage. Help us deliver it. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free.
close-image