Quantcast
Connect with us

Trump aides quickly backpedal to reverse his huge Social Security blunder

Published

on

Donald Trump during CNN debate (Photo: Screen capture via video)

President Donald Trump vowed that workers would not have to pay back payroll taxes if he is re-elected, prompting advisers to downplay his comments amid concerns that such a move could defund Social Security and Medicare.

Trump signed multiple executive orders over the weekend in an attempt to bypass stalled congressional negotiations over the next round of coronavirus relief, though the orders fall well short of the proposed legislation. Their legality have also been called into question.

ADVERTISEMENT

One of the orders targets the payroll tax, the 12.4% tax split evenly between employers and employees which funds the Social Security and Medicare trust funds. The order would allow workers to defer their payroll tax payments through the end of the year, but those taxes would still need to be paid back by April 15.

Trump responded to skepticism about the impact of the move by telling voters that he would make make the cut “permanent” — but only if he’s re-elected.

“If I’m victorious on Nov. 3, I plan to forgive these taxes and make permanent cuts to the payroll tax,” Trump said during a news conference from his Bedminster, N.J. golf club on Saturday. “I’m going to make them all permanent. In other words, I’ll extend beyond the end of the year and terminate the tax, and so we’ll see what happens.”

The president has no authority to unilaterally make changes to the tax code. Though Congress has the power to do so, Trump’s own Republican Party has repeatedly rejected his proposed payroll tax cut, because it would do little to help during the pandemic while crippling the Social Security and Medicare programs.

Advocacy groups decried Trump’s vow over the weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Social Security is more crucial than ever as Americans face the one-two punch of the coronavirus’s health and economic consequences,” Nancy LeMond, the executive vice president of the AARP, said in statement. “But this approach exacerbates people’s already-heightened fears and concerns about their financial and retirement security.”

Presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden said Trump’s vow threatened to “undermine the entire financial footing of Social Security.”

“He is laying out his road map to cutting Social Security,” he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

Aside from endangering Social Security, economists believe the move would do little to help those who need it.

“Even if people were to see a bigger paycheck in a number of weeks, the underlying policy is really poor policy,” Chye-Ching Huang, the senior director of economic policy at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, told The Washington Post. “The people who would be seeing the biggest increase in their paychecks still have jobs, still have earnings . . . People who lost jobs or retired or get income from other sources would see no help from this.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Trump advisers rushed to clean up the president’s comments on Sunday, insisting that the move would not impact Social Security.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, who according to The New York Times was reluctant about the payroll tax suspension, said the funds would be reimbursed from the Treasury general fund.

“The president in no way wants to harm those trust funds, so they’d be reimbursed just as they always have in the past when we’ve done these types of things,” he told Fox News.

ADVERTISEMENT

But Mnuchin also said that if Trump gets re-elected, he would “push through legislation to forgive that so, in essence, it will turn into a payroll tax cut.”

Top White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow, who pushed for the payroll tax suspension, claimed to CNN that Trump “will protect Social Security and Medicare” and wrongly insisted that he did not vow to permanently cut the payroll tax.

“When he referred to ‘permanent,’ I think what he was saying is that the deferral of the payroll tax to the end of the year will be made permanent,” Kudlow said. “It will be forgiven. The tax is not going to go away.”

“That isn’t what the president said at all,” host Dana Bash responded. “He said the opposite.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

Breaking Banner

Attorney George Conway reveals two ‘great’ questions — that Trump can’t answer

Published

on

Prominent Republican attorney and Lincoln Project member George Conway on Monday offered his analysis of how reporters should question President Donald Trump.

Conway, the husband of White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, made his comments after watching video of Trump refusing to criticize Russian President Vladimir Putin.

“Who do you think poisoned Alexei Navalny in Russia?”

“Uh,” Trump replied. “We’ll talk about that at another time.”

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Jaime Harrison says ‘I am living rent free in Lindsey Graham’s head’ — and he might be right

Published

on

Jaime Harrison, the Democrat challenging Sen. Lindsey Graham, on Monday said that his upstart campaign is panicking the incumbent.

Harrison was interviewed on MSNBC by "The Last Word" anchor Lawrence O'Donnell, who noted the most recent polling shows a tied race.

"Have you experienced any extra fund-raising surge over the weekend?" O'Donnell asked.

"Well, Lawrence, we have gotten tremendous support and we really appreciate it," Harrison replied.

"Do you believe you have the resources and the campaign team and the ground troops you need in South Carolina to actually pull this off?" O'Donnell asked later in the interview.

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

Outrage against Dianne Feinstein as potential Judiciary chair comes out against Senate reform

Published

on

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) received harsh criticism on Monday after coming out against Senate reform of the filibuster.

“I don't believe in doing that. I think the filibuster serves a purpose," Feinstein argued.

"It is not often used, it's often less used now than when I first came, and I think it's part of the Senate that differentiates itself," Feinstein falsely claimed.

https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/1308169580658012160

Feinstein is in line to chair the Senate Judiciary Committee if Democrats regain the Senate, despite never attending law school or having ever tried a case.

Continue Reading
 
 
Democracy is in peril. Invest in progressive news. Join Raw Story Investigates for $1. Go ad-free. LEARN MORE