Quantcast
Connect with us

Critics outraged after Bill Barr’s ‘naked political ploy’ aims to bolster baseless Donald Trump fraud allegations

Published

on

Bill Barr and Donald Trump (AFP)

U.S. Attorney General William Barr came under fire overnight after issuing a memo to federal prosecutors that critics warn aims to bolster President Donald Trump’s so far baseless claims that rampant voter fraud—which doesn’t factually exist—cost him reelection.

“To do so when there is no such evidence—and when the president’s clear strategy is to delegitimize the results of a proper election—is one of the more problematic acts of any attorney general in my lifetime.”
—Stephen I. Vladeck, University of Texas School of Law
According to the Huffington Post:

ADVERTISEMENT

Barr’s memo, sent to U.S. attorneys across the country, authorizes an exception to Justice Department guidelines, telling top federal prosecutors they could “pursue substantial allegations of voting and vote tabulation irregularities prior to the certification of elections in your jurisdictions in certain cases.” Barr wrote that he’d already done so in specific instances.

“Such inquiries and reviews may be conducted if there are clear and apparently-credible allegations of irregularities that, if true, could potentially impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual State,” Barr wrote. “Any investigation of claims of irregularities that, if true, would clearly not impact the outcome of a federal election in an individual State should normally be deferred until after the election certification process is completed.”

The reversal of longstanding DOJ policy—especially under circumstances when no allegations of significant fraud have been substantiated and as Trump continues his refusal to concede or acknowledge the vote tabulations which show he lost the electoral college and popular vote tallies by significant margins—was seen by legal experts as a brazen effort by Barr to legitimatize the president’s baseless and dangerous narrative about the integrity of the election.

Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, tweeted:

ADVERTISEMENT

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) was unsparing in her rebuke:

ADVERTISEMENT

In response to the memo (pdf), Kristen Clarke, president and executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, denounced the directive as a partisan effort to give comfort to the president’s baseless claims while doing serious damage to the reputation of the DOJ as a non-political arm of the government.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We condemn Attorney General’s Barr post-election attempt to weaponize the Justice Department to breathe life into President Trump’s baseless and unsubstantiated claims of vote fraud,” Clarke said in a statement late Monday night. “Barr’s attempt to interject and activate federal prosecutors is clearly part of a coordinated attempt to sow chaos and discord, and undermine confidence in the electoral outcome.”

“Americans,” she continued, “will see this move for what it is—a naked political ploy and it will not succeed. This move is especially astounding given the Justice Department’s deafening silence regarding countless documented instances of voter suppression and voting discrimination this season.”

Speaking with the New York Times, Stephen I. Vladeck, a University of Texas School of Law professor, said the memo is deeply troubling. “It would be problematic enough if Barr were reversing longstanding Justice Department guidance because of significant, substantiated claims of misconduct—that could presumably be handled at the local and state level,” Vladeck said. “But to do so when there is no such evidence—and when the president’s clear strategy is to delegitimize the results of a proper election—is one of the more problematic acts of any attorney general in my lifetime.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Following Barr’s issuance of the memo, the Times’ DOJ correspondent Katie Benner reported that Richard Pilger, the DOJ official who heads the voter fraud division, resigned his position in objection to the orders it contained:

According to the Washington Post, people said Barr had first broached a similar idea some weeks ago and that political leadership in the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, of which the Election Crimes Branch is a part, pushed back. Those officials were blindsided when Barr’s memo was released on Monday, the people said.”

ADVERTISEMENT


Report typos and corrections to: [email protected].
READ COMMENTS - JOIN THE DISCUSSION
Continue Reading

2020 Election

Republican pollster: Trump’s attitude over the next six weeks may hurt GOP chances of keeping Senate

Published

on

A coalition of U.S. government security agencies has taken the step to defend the integrity of the 2020 presidential election, calling it “the most secure in American history.” Even so, President Donald J. Trump, the man on the losing ticket, has continued denying the results. Now, experts warn that if Trump doesn't walk away from the fight and offer a peaceful transfer of power to the President-elect Joe Biden's incoming administration, it could hurt GOP chances to retain the U.S. Senate.

Continue Reading

2020 Election

Conservative columnist accuses Republicans of turning their voters into a mob of anti-democracy fascists

Published

on

Conservative Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin attacked Republican officials who have spent the past decade turning their most ardent supporters into a kind of anti-democracy mob.

Writing her column on Monday, Rubin cited the CNN interviews with Gov. Larry Hogan (R-MD) and John Bolton as being one of a handful of Republicans willing to speak out against the tyranny that President Donald Trump is being allowed to continue.

“State election officials and judges throughout the country are serving as protectors of our democracy at a time when, frankly, Republican leaders in Washington, D.C., are failing miserably at the job, as are administration officials who have proven willing to degrade themselves, to serve the president’s brittle spirit instead of the Constitution and the American people," Rubin cited CNN's Jake Tapper from "State of the Union" this Sunday.

Continue Reading
 

2020 Election

WATCH: Melania Trump goes maskless as she participates in White House Christmas tree delivery

Published

on

First Lady Melania Trump declined to wear a face mask as she was receiving this year's White House Christmas tree.

In White House video released on Monday, the first lady can be seen without a mask while accepting delivery of the tree. However, masks were worn by everyone else seen in the video.

The White House has been criticized for allowing COVID-19 to spread at events where attendees are not required to wear masks. At least two "super spreader" events have already taken place at the White House.

The First Lady's Office has said that Hanukkah and Christmas celebrations are expected to take place with smaller crowds.

Continue Reading