FBI director hasn't explained how he 'dropped the ball' on Jan. 6 – making it 'hard to move forward': former FBI counsel

FBI director hasn't explained how he 'dropped the ball' on Jan. 6 – making it 'hard to move forward': former FBI counsel
(AFP Photo/Saul LOEB)

FBI Director Christopher Wray has never given a full explanation to the American people about how the state and national FBI offices failed so profoundly on the Jan. 6 attack.

"Christopher Wray is leading the FBI at a time when the threat environment is as dramatically different from those post-9/11 years as at any other point," MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said to New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt. "What is your sense of how he has transformed the bureau to deal with the threat?"

Schmidt said that there is a question about how much counterterrorism is focused on foreign issues over domestic threats, which was the norm after Sept. 11. Now that there are a heightened number of threats from within the U.S., but no real understanding of what the FBI is doing to deal with such a threat.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Andrew Weissmann, who previously served as the FBI's general counsel under Director Robert Mueller, recalled a story of a conversation with former President George W. Bush who said he didn't care about bringing the terrorists to justice as much as he cared about preventing the next attack. It was the "marching order," he said, that changed the FBI.

Now that the country faces an increase in domestic terrorism, it means another shift, where the best agents focus on militia groups and anti-government extremists. So, it requires a new set of expertise, new agents and different targets.

"Many people say that one of the reasons that the FBI and other agencies really dropped the ball on Jan. 6th and were very slow to react is because they weren't thinking and correctly evaluating the problem of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers," Weissmann continued. "The internal text messages and communications. And the Secret Service is an example of that. These were white supremacy groups where they have not been traditionally viewed as posing the same kind of threat. And I think that was obviously wrong. I think there was a tinge of racism in that. And certainly comparing it to how they responded to Antifa."

He went on to say that the FBI must evolve, but also be held accountable.

"I would say Chris Wray still has a lot more work to do," Weissmann closed. "You know, he still has not actually given a very public, candid account of what exactly happened on Jan. 6th and the intelligence failures and the inaction with respect to the intelligence they did have. And so it's very hard to move forward without that kind of very public accounting, which I think would have happened under -- certainly under Robert Mueller. He sort of beat that into us, of being super candid about failures and how we're going to deal with them going forward."

See the full discussion in the video below or at the link here.


Chris Wray's failure of accountability on Jan. 6 www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Political observers bashed Paul Ingrassia, a right-wing podcaster whom President Donald Trump nominated to lead the Office of the Special Counsel, after he withdrew his nomination on Tuesday.

Ingrassia has a long history of making incendiary statements, some of which recently came to light when Politico reported on a series of text messages he sent. In one message, Ingrassia called for the federal Martin Luther King Jr. holiday to be "tossed to the 7th circle of hell." In another, he claimed to have a"Nazi streak" in him.

Ingrassia's lawyer has denied the authenticity of the texts. Even so, Ingrassia withdrew his nomination.

"I will be withdrawing myself from Thursday’s HSGAC hearing to lead the Office of Special Counsel because, unfortunately, I do not have enough Republican votes at this time," Ingrassia posted in a statement on X. "I appreciate the overwhelming support that I have received throughout this process and will continue to serve President Trump and this administration to Make America Great Again!"

Observers bashed Ingrassia's statement on social media.

"This isn’t anywhere near enough. Trump has to fire him immediately," Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) posted on X.

"We're sure your mom is devastated :/," The Democrats wrote on X.

"Tough day for sons of boy moms," Marcus Robinson, senior spokesperson for The Democrats, posted on X.

"Given his long history of inflammatory/outrageous posts, a question: Did the administration not know about these statements when he was nominated, or did they know about them and nominate him anyway?" journalist Paul Farhi posted on X.

"I was looking forward to serving my country in this new role. Unfortunately I turned out to be a Nazi, according to me. So I'm bagging on the nomination hearing. Since I'm not good at writing sentences in English it's not clear whether I'm bagging the hearing or my nomination," Josh Marshall, founder of Talking Points Memo, posted on X.


THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A CNN panelist on Tuesday night called President Donald Trump's pursuit of a $230 million payment from the Justice Department as restitution for the previous prosecutions "disgusting" and "tone-deaf."

CNN political commentator Ana Navarro joined "NewsNight with Abby Phillip" on Tuesday and discussed Trump's attempt to get the Justice Department to pay him. According to reports, the two people who would be responsible for approving the payment are both lawyers who either represented Trump or one of his allies.

The Justice Department also did not clarify whether the two lawyers would recuse themselves from the case, if Trump officially asks for payment, according to reports.

Navarro said Trump's seeking payment from the Justice Department is "tone-deaf," given that many Americans are unable to pay for rent and groceries.

"This is just one more stripe on the tiger," she said. "You've got the crypto grift. You've got Melania getting paid $40 million from Amazon for a documentary. You've got Melania selling Christmas ornaments. You've got Trump hawking watches. You've got the $400 million jet from Qatar. I mean, the list is long and with no oversight."

"The tone deafness here is disgusting," she continued. "But at the same time, it is the level of corruption that has almost become normal because of the lack of Republican willingness to be the oversight on what is happening."

The conservative Wall Street Journal editorial board told young MAGA fans on Tuesday that the failure of the Trump administration to confirm right-wing podcaster Paul Ingrassia to the Office of the Special Counsel should serve as a "potent" warning for those who seek to emulate the extreme behavior he displayed.

On Monday, Politico reported on a series of leaked text messages of Ingrassia's, where he denounced the federal Martin Luther King Jr. holiday and said he had "a bit of a Nazi streak" in him. Ingrassia's lawyers have denied the authenticity of the texts.

Ingrassia faced a steep confirmation process in Congress because of his history of making incendiary statements. Even so, the process seemed to give Republicans a "useful" opportunity to denounce that kind of behavior within the party, according to the editorial.

"At least four Republican Senators have come out against confirming Paul Ingrassia to lead the Office of Special Counsel, after the publication of odious text messages he apparently sent," the editorial board wrote. "Beyond the failure of vetting, it would be useful if President Trump made clear that this kind of garbage isn’t wanted in his MAGA political movement."

"The demise of Mr. Ingrassia’s nomination would show that the GOP won’t tolerate his brand of extremist political behavior and rhetoric," the editorial continued. "It could also be a potent lesson for MAGA youth in what not to do."

Read the entire report by clicking here.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}