FBI director hasn't explained how he 'dropped the ball' on Jan. 6 – making it 'hard to move forward': former FBI counsel

FBI director hasn't explained how he 'dropped the ball' on Jan. 6 – making it 'hard to move forward': former FBI counsel
(AFP Photo/Saul LOEB)

FBI Director Christopher Wray has never given a full explanation to the American people about how the state and national FBI offices failed so profoundly on the Jan. 6 attack.

"Christopher Wray is leading the FBI at a time when the threat environment is as dramatically different from those post-9/11 years as at any other point," MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said to New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt. "What is your sense of how he has transformed the bureau to deal with the threat?"

Schmidt said that there is a question about how much counterterrorism is focused on foreign issues over domestic threats, which was the norm after Sept. 11. Now that there are a heightened number of threats from within the U.S., but no real understanding of what the FBI is doing to deal with such a threat.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Andrew Weissmann, who previously served as the FBI's general counsel under Director Robert Mueller, recalled a story of a conversation with former President George W. Bush who said he didn't care about bringing the terrorists to justice as much as he cared about preventing the next attack. It was the "marching order," he said, that changed the FBI.

Now that the country faces an increase in domestic terrorism, it means another shift, where the best agents focus on militia groups and anti-government extremists. So, it requires a new set of expertise, new agents and different targets.

"Many people say that one of the reasons that the FBI and other agencies really dropped the ball on Jan. 6th and were very slow to react is because they weren't thinking and correctly evaluating the problem of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers," Weissmann continued. "The internal text messages and communications. And the Secret Service is an example of that. These were white supremacy groups where they have not been traditionally viewed as posing the same kind of threat. And I think that was obviously wrong. I think there was a tinge of racism in that. And certainly comparing it to how they responded to Antifa."

He went on to say that the FBI must evolve, but also be held accountable.

"I would say Chris Wray still has a lot more work to do," Weissmann closed. "You know, he still has not actually given a very public, candid account of what exactly happened on Jan. 6th and the intelligence failures and the inaction with respect to the intelligence they did have. And so it's very hard to move forward without that kind of very public accounting, which I think would have happened under -- certainly under Robert Mueller. He sort of beat that into us, of being super candid about failures and how we're going to deal with them going forward."

See the full discussion in the video below or at the link here.


Chris Wray's failure of accountability on Jan. 6 www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

A progressive YouTuber revealed on Sunday the "worst part" of President Donald Trump's seeming absence from the 2026 midterm race for the GOP.

Brian Tyler Cohen said in a new episode of his podcast "No Lie" on Sunday that Trump is not campaigning like he once did, which gives Democrats an opportunity to connect with "regular people." He described the situation as a "huge opening" because Trump's absence is "dragging the rest of his party down with him."

"This is a guy who has had a clean break from anyone around this country," Cohen said, referring to Trump. "He doesn't go to rallies. He doesn't talk to regular people. He surrounded himself with tech bros and billionaire CEOs."

"And the worst part for the broader GOP is that he still expects total loyalty from them," he continued. "Meaning he himself is not only a sinking ship, but he's dragging the rest of his party down with him."

Cohen also caveated that this isn't some "we got him moment" for Democrats. But it does present an opportunity that the Democratic Party can capitalize on.

"If we can run people who are dynamic, who relate to the people that they're running to represent, who can exploit the Republicans' biggest weakness on the economy, then we have a very good chance to flip the House," Cohen said. "And I'm even bullish on the Senate. Nothing is more important right now than ensuring that Trump's agenda stops in its tracks in January of 2027."

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A Democratic lawmaker said on Sunday that her son was pulled over by immigration agents, news that caused the internet to erupt with criticism toward the Trump administration.

Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) told local news station WCCO in the Twin Cities, a CBS affiliate station, that her son was pulled over by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents for speeding on Saturday and was asked to prove his citizenship. Her son was able to produce a passport identification, and was let go thereafter, Omar said in the interview.

Analysts and observers pointed out that the event happened after weeks of Trump's public attacks against the Somali-American community.

Omar's interview generated backlash towards the Trump administration online.

"This is targeted, tyrannical, and unacceptable and it's appalling for Congress to keep abdicating its responsibility and handing over power to a bunch of corrupt, bigoted autocratic thugs," writer and cultural critic Soraya Nadia McDonald posted on Bluesky.

"Given that they can run plates, this was potentially targeted," Harvard law professor Alejandra Caraballo posted on Bluesky. "This administration is completely out of control."

"Sickening world," Timothy McBride, law professor at Washington University in St. Louis, posted on Bluesky. "Rep. Omar is brilliant and I appreciate her leadership and wisdom so much."

"What Trump is doing to the Somali-American community is deplorable," journalist Marisa Kabas posted on Bluesky.

"This needs looking into," journalist Michael McGough posted on X.

The Wall Street Journal's conservative editorial board warned Republicans that they face a "bruising" primary in Texas after Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) announced her candidacy for the Senate.

Crockett announced her run after the Supreme Court ruled that Texas could use its redrawn electoral map for the 2026 primary. The new map made four Democratic-held Congressional seats, Crockett's included, more competitive for Republicans.

The Journal's editorial board argued in a new editorial on Sunday that Crockett's entering the Senate race is "good news" for Republicans. If she wins the Democratic primary, she will face off against high-profile Republican candidates like Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) or Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton.

However, the race could prove costly for the party, the editorial warned.

"Texas Rep. Jasmine Crockett launched a campaign for the U.S. Senate last week, and a poll out Friday shows her leading the race for the Democratic nomination with majority support," the editorial reads in part. "This should be good news for Republicans, since Ms. Crockett is loudly to the left of the overall Texas electorate. Yet the GOP might have a bruising primary that leaves it unable to capitalize."

The editorial added that Republicans should support a candidate who can win independent and moderate votes, which would be key to defeating someone like Crockett.

"Republicans are confident about holding the Senate because they’d have to lose a net of four seats to lose control," the editorial continued. "But if 2026 is a big year for Democrats, Texas could be decisive. What if Republicans nominate Mr. Paxton, and then the GOP has to spend tens of millions trying to explain and defend him? Maybe that’s what Ms. Crockett is counting on."

Read the entire editorial by clicking here.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}