FBI director hasn't explained how he 'dropped the ball' on Jan. 6 – making it 'hard to move forward': former FBI counsel

FBI director hasn't explained how he 'dropped the ball' on Jan. 6 – making it 'hard to move forward': former FBI counsel
(AFP Photo/Saul LOEB)

FBI Director Christopher Wray has never given a full explanation to the American people about how the state and national FBI offices failed so profoundly on the Jan. 6 attack.

"Christopher Wray is leading the FBI at a time when the threat environment is as dramatically different from those post-9/11 years as at any other point," MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said to New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt. "What is your sense of how he has transformed the bureau to deal with the threat?"

Schmidt said that there is a question about how much counterterrorism is focused on foreign issues over domestic threats, which was the norm after Sept. 11. Now that there are a heightened number of threats from within the U.S., but no real understanding of what the FBI is doing to deal with such a threat.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Andrew Weissmann, who previously served as the FBI's general counsel under Director Robert Mueller, recalled a story of a conversation with former President George W. Bush who said he didn't care about bringing the terrorists to justice as much as he cared about preventing the next attack. It was the "marching order," he said, that changed the FBI.

Now that the country faces an increase in domestic terrorism, it means another shift, where the best agents focus on militia groups and anti-government extremists. So, it requires a new set of expertise, new agents and different targets.

"Many people say that one of the reasons that the FBI and other agencies really dropped the ball on Jan. 6th and were very slow to react is because they weren't thinking and correctly evaluating the problem of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers," Weissmann continued. "The internal text messages and communications. And the Secret Service is an example of that. These were white supremacy groups where they have not been traditionally viewed as posing the same kind of threat. And I think that was obviously wrong. I think there was a tinge of racism in that. And certainly comparing it to how they responded to Antifa."

He went on to say that the FBI must evolve, but also be held accountable.

"I would say Chris Wray still has a lot more work to do," Weissmann closed. "You know, he still has not actually given a very public, candid account of what exactly happened on Jan. 6th and the intelligence failures and the inaction with respect to the intelligence they did have. And so it's very hard to move forward without that kind of very public accounting, which I think would have happened under -- certainly under Robert Mueller. He sort of beat that into us, of being super candid about failures and how we're going to deal with them going forward."

See the full discussion in the video below or at the link here.


Chris Wray's failure of accountability on Jan. 6 www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

News item: House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer tells Politico that members of his panel are open to a Trump pardon of Ghislaine Maxwell as a way to encourage her to provide testimony about Jeffrey Epstein.

Reaction: Oh sure, by all means grant the most notorious sex trafficking accomplice and groomer of underage girls in American history her freedom. That should help seal the fate of Republicans who go along with it for decades to come.

OK, now I know I’ve said stuff like this before. I’m also the guy who believed Trump would never get past pardoning the January 6 convicts en masse. And I apparently mistakenly thought, “Well, surely attacking the Pope – THE POPE! – has got to be a bridge too far.” I realize all too well that none of his transparent criminality has proven a deal-breaker to his brain-dead MAGA-ites. I get it.

But pardoning Epstein’s co-conspirator? I’m sorry, but I just can’t believe that could possibly fly on this or any other planet.

Transferring Maxwell to the minimum security (read: country club) prison in Bryan, Texas last year was one thing. Granting her complete freedom? Quite another.

I’m sorry, but I have to believe there is a low that’s too low even for people whose burners are no longer heating the teapot. You don’t make deals with a convicted felon to supply info on someone who is no longer alive. That’s the thing about these Epstein Files: we do not, in fact, give a rat’s backside about Epstein himself. He’s dead. That ship has more than sailed.

Those whose past abuse and complicity matter are the ones still living who could, just maybe, face justice if those shaping the narrative would permit something resembling real hearings to take place.

I can’t believe I even need to write this sentence, but absolutely nothing that exits the mouth of Maxwell should be seen as the truth. She’s a compulsive liar interested only in saving herself. Her word carries zero credibility. She’s lied before. She will lie again. And again. And again.

So, let’s stop deluding ourselves into believing the woman holds valuable information. She clearly does, but that won’t be what she would be sharing. She’s merely hoping to parlay the illusion of honesty into a Get Out of Jail Free card. Her pardon would come in exchange for shoveling nonsense that steers all lawless behavior away from a certain president and his wealthy cronies.

It's only because Maxwell has played the game of deflection and protection well that she is still alive. If she hadn’t, she would have long ago met an unfortunate end behind bars – and I’m not talking about suicide but the other kind of “cide” that starts with an “h.”

That her being sprung from captivity is even being seriously tossed out as a possibility is unfathomable.

Let’s do a quick recap of what Ms. Maxwell was convicted of in 2022 that led to her being sentenced to 20 years in federal prison:

  • She identified, recruited, and groomed girls as young as 14, vulnerable teenagers with whom she built trust before shattering it by forcing them into sexual bondage.
  • She trained victims to accept inappropriate conduct, often by participating in or being present during the abuse.
  • She arranged travel, scheduling visits to Epstein’s homes/island and creating an environment where the molestation and rape could occur.
  • She helped maintain the network by keeping victims compliant, sometimes encouraging them to recruit other girls and keep the supply chain well-stocked.
  • She was a central organizer of perhaps the most egregious sex trafficking and pedophile ring ever, a person who lowered victims’ defenses through social manipulation and extended the reach and duration of Epstein’s vile operation.
  • She was, throughout her decades by Epstein’s side, a shameless exploiter and far more than just an associate. She was the engine that drove the machine.

How much does Maxwell know? A whole helluva lot. How much is she willing to actually tell? Pretty much nothing. She is, once again, valueless as an information source. Her job at this point is primarily to protect Donald Trump, and if she’s successful, she will be vastly rewarded. In fact, she’s already begun collecting on her silence with the transfer to the much cushier federal lockup.

If we have learned nothing else from Trump’s time as our chief executive, it’s that loyalty isn’t just required, it’s the whole shebang. The more criminally you will cover for Trump, the greater the respect he has for you and — often, not always — the more he will do for you. Until he tosses you under the bus anyway, of course.

But would Trump really go so far as to pardon Maxwell? Absolutely. It isn’t a matter of morality, of course. Were you to look under a moral microscope into Trump’s DNA, there would be no evidence of even the smallest twinge of fiber.

No, the only reason Trump might decline to pardon, or at least delay pardoning, Maxwell has everything to do with whether the blowback might be too intense. It’s mostly a matter of timing. Once the Epstein heat has sufficiently cooled, the odds are pretty good he would see an opening.

Let’s remember that after Maxwell’s original arrest in 2022, Trump was on record saying, “I wish her well.” Really. It was a little bit like wishing Rudolf Hess well in his military tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945.

In this case, wishing Maxwell well was his coded way of saying, “Now you be a good little inmate and we’ll see about helping you out of this mess down the road. If you’re not, we’ll have to take care of you a different way.”

It’s clear that Ghislaine heard that message loud and clear. When she was “deposed” by Trump's lawyer (now Acting Attorney General) Todd Blanche, she “testified” that she never saw Trump do a single thing in Epstein’s presence. He was basically taking naps while everything was going on.

In this administration and with this president, truth is not only dead; it never existed in the first place. Lies are the only currency this corrupt regime accepts. If it ultimately gains Maxwell her freedom, it should bring them all crashing down.

Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

WASHINGTON — Rep. Pat Ryan (D-NY) harshly criticized Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth following his firing of Navy Secretary John Phelan without explanation, while U.S. warships actively blockade Iranian ports.

Ryan, a West Point graduate and Army veteran, described Hegseth as having thin skin, a "joke", and a "performance artist" that military officers don't take seriously.

“It's more score settling. The revenge tour. In the middle of a war. In the middle of a naval blockade," he lamented to Raw Story.

Rep. Jason Crow (D-CO), a former Army Ranger who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, also expressed concern amid the sudden changes, pointing out the Armed Services Committee received no advance notice and pledged to investigate the firings.

"So it's very disturbing. We're going to obviously be pressing to get information about why this is happening and what is the basis for these firings," Crow told Raw Story.

Since Trump's return, the chair of the Joint Chiefs, the chief of naval operations, the Coast Guard commandant, and the Defense Intelligence Agency director have all been removed.

Phelan, a billionaire Trump donor who clashed with Hegseth, questioned whether Trump authorized his firing before it was confirmed by White House officials.

Ryan warned the firings would harm troops and Americans at the gas pump, amid $500 billion in new defense spending.

Watch the video below.


A GOP lawmaker who's endorsed by Trump struggled to answer a basic question about why voters should support Trump's call to unseat Republican Indiana state senators with retaliatory gerrymandering.

"Good question, um. Gosh, okay, defining issue. What's it about?" Republican state Rep. Michelle Davis from Indiana responded to a Politico reporter on Thursday. "Well, what I say, what it's about is, that we need real, true conservatives out there. We need someone who's going to stand with the GOP Party."

Davis was speaking at a conservative rally in Indiana hosted by Turning Point USA when the question seemed to catch her off guard. The question came as Trump seeks revenge for Virginia voters siding with Democrats and gerrymandering their state with a ballot measure that passed on Tuesday.

Indiana voters will have to decide during primary elections on May 5 whether to oust eight of their state's GOP lawmakers who refuse to get on board with Trump's demand to redistrict and water down the Democrats' advantage in Virginia. Republicans are looking for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to make a similar counterattack.

After stumbling over a few words, Davis said that primary voters need a candidate campaigning on "stuff like common sense, stuff like making sure that boys aren't in girls locker rooms, boys don't play in girls sports, making sure that we don't stand up for parental rights, yeah, those are the kind of defining things I think are out there."

Davis is running against state Sen. Greg Walker with Trump's endorsement, but she didn't mention him, the Politico article noted. She confessed, however, that "when I'm knocking on doors, not one person was talking to me about redistricting."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}