FBI director hasn't explained how he 'dropped the ball' on Jan. 6 – making it 'hard to move forward': former FBI counsel

FBI director hasn't explained how he 'dropped the ball' on Jan. 6 – making it 'hard to move forward': former FBI counsel
(AFP Photo/Saul LOEB)

FBI Director Christopher Wray has never given a full explanation to the American people about how the state and national FBI offices failed so profoundly on the Jan. 6 attack.

"Christopher Wray is leading the FBI at a time when the threat environment is as dramatically different from those post-9/11 years as at any other point," MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace said to New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt. "What is your sense of how he has transformed the bureau to deal with the threat?"

Schmidt said that there is a question about how much counterterrorism is focused on foreign issues over domestic threats, which was the norm after Sept. 11. Now that there are a heightened number of threats from within the U.S., but no real understanding of what the FBI is doing to deal with such a threat.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

Andrew Weissmann, who previously served as the FBI's general counsel under Director Robert Mueller, recalled a story of a conversation with former President George W. Bush who said he didn't care about bringing the terrorists to justice as much as he cared about preventing the next attack. It was the "marching order," he said, that changed the FBI.

Now that the country faces an increase in domestic terrorism, it means another shift, where the best agents focus on militia groups and anti-government extremists. So, it requires a new set of expertise, new agents and different targets.

"Many people say that one of the reasons that the FBI and other agencies really dropped the ball on Jan. 6th and were very slow to react is because they weren't thinking and correctly evaluating the problem of the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers," Weissmann continued. "The internal text messages and communications. And the Secret Service is an example of that. These were white supremacy groups where they have not been traditionally viewed as posing the same kind of threat. And I think that was obviously wrong. I think there was a tinge of racism in that. And certainly comparing it to how they responded to Antifa."

He went on to say that the FBI must evolve, but also be held accountable.

"I would say Chris Wray still has a lot more work to do," Weissmann closed. "You know, he still has not actually given a very public, candid account of what exactly happened on Jan. 6th and the intelligence failures and the inaction with respect to the intelligence they did have. And so it's very hard to move forward without that kind of very public accounting, which I think would have happened under -- certainly under Robert Mueller. He sort of beat that into us, of being super candid about failures and how we're going to deal with them going forward."

See the full discussion in the video below or at the link here.


Chris Wray's failure of accountability on Jan. 6 www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

President Donald Trump's administration deployed two highly secretive immigration forces to Minneapolis, according to a new report, and one expert argued that they are the "wrong tool for the job."

Wired reported on Tuesday that the Trump administration has deployed Immigration and Customs Enforcement's two Special Response Teams (SRT), the SRT from Customs and Border Patrol, and the Border Patrol Tactical Unit (BORTAC) to Minneapolis as part of its Operation Metro Surge. The administration has also deployed these teams to Southern California and Illinois, where immigration forces have clashed with local protesters.

The forces are effectively special operations units within their respective agencies, which employ many military veterans and operate under a "wartime mindset," according to the report. Unlike police officers, SRT and BORTAC forces wear full riot gear, carry heavy-duty crowd control weapons, and are known to deploy chemical weapons without warning, the report added.

One expert who spoke with Wired said the forces are "absolutely the wrong tool for the job." The report also indicated that it may be difficult to hold these officers accountable for their actions, given that they are rarely named in court documents.

“These teams are our equivalent of special operations command," Gil Kerlikowske, a former CBP commissioner from 2014 through 2017, told Wired.

“BORTAC in particular is used to operating in the desert. They are not trained for urban policing,” Kerlikowske said. "They’re absolutely the wrong tool for the job. It’s like using a chainsaw to mow your lawn.”

Wired also reviewed more than 100 court cases involving the SRT and BORTAC teams and found that they are rarely named or identified in any way, even when accused of violating someone's civil rights.

The report also warned that the "brutal" tactics these teams use appear to have "spread into ICE and CBP as a whole."

Read the entire report by clicking here.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

President Donald Trump's threat on Tuesday to sue an author who has written four books about him appears to be all hot air.

Trump told reporters on Saturday that he would likely sue author Michael Wolff, who Trump alleged "conspired" with disgraced financier and convicted sex criminal Jeffrey Epstein to hurt Trump politically. Wolff has been highly critical of both Trump administrations and has revealed several disturbing facts about Trump's relationship with Epstein. The president doubled down on those threats against Wolff during a bill signing at the White House on Tuesday.

Wolff responded to Trump's threats in a new episode of "Inside Trump's Head," a podcast he co-hosts with Joanna Coles of The Daily Beast.

"He obviously has so much to hide," Wolff said. "But also, he can't sue me. What is he going to do? Is he going to sit for a deposition? Is he going to answer all of the questions that I would have the right to ask him about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein?"

Last week, Trump's Department of Justice released more than 3 million new Epstein files, which set off a firestorm of debate about how the convicted sex criminal was able to rub shoulders with the world's wealthiest and most powerful people.

The files also brought to light that some Trump allies, including people in his second administration, have not been honest about their relationships with Epstein either. For instance, it was revealed that Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick continued corresponding with Epstein years after he claimed to have cut off contact.

The House GOP's efforts to force former President Bill Clinton and his wife, Hillary, a former Secretary of State, to testify about their relationship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein could backfire on President Donald Trump.

On Monday, the Clintons agreed to testify before the House Oversight Committee, which is led by fierce Trump ally Rep. James Comer (R-KY), and includes other MAGA firebrands like Reps. Byron Donalds (R-FL) and Nancy Mace (R-SC). The agreement ended a months-long stalemate, during which time the Clintons' lawyer accused Comer of acting in bad faith to secure their testimony.

CNN contributor Kara Swisher revealed on Tuesday on "The Source" with Kaitlan Collins that those efforts could blow up in Trump's face by increasing calls for him and his allies to testify as well.

"I think everybody should [testify]," Swisher said about people mentioned in the latest release of the Epstein files.

"I did a recent interview with [Rep.] Ro Khanna (D-CA) and he said the same thing," she added. "They should testify, and they should testify fully and honestly. And so should President Trump."

Last week, the Department of Justice released more than 3 million new documents from the Epstein files, some of which painted Trump's relationship with the disgraced financier in a negative light.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}