E. Jean Carroll jury just delivered a big 'message' to Trump with its verdict: expert

A legal expert said Friday that the jury in Donald Trump's defamation trial wanted to deliver a very clear message when it hit him with a massive amount of damages.

The former president was ordered to pay $83.3 million after a civil jury sided with writer E. Jean Carroll as her lawyers described how the former president defamed her. Of that, $65 million was in punitive damages, which are meant to punish the defendant.

The substantial amount comes after Carroll had already been awarded damages of $5 million in an earlier defamation and sexual abuse trial last year.

In Friday's decision, former federal prosecutor Elie Honig believes the amount they came to — far greater than the $10 million her legal team initially sought — was intentionally high to send a strong message.

"This is a massive number, far in excess of anything I think anyone really expected —18 times the amount of the verdict in the first trial. ... [Her] lawyers explicitly asked the jury to send a message and that is what they have done," he said during an appearance on CNN's "The Lead" with Jake Tapper minutes after the verdict was reported.

Honig continued: “$60 million in punitive damages — that is a message to a person who essentially the jury says we don't think you can be deterred for anything less than this massive amount of money."

Trump has already vowed he will appeal.

"Absolutely ridiculous," he posted on Truth Social. "I fully disagree with both verdicts, and will be appealing this whole Biden Directed Witch Hunt focused on me and the Republican Party. Our Legal System is out of control, and being used as a Political Weapon. They have taken away all First Amendment Rights. THIS IS NOT AMERICA!"

His attorney Alina Habba also appeared before a scrum of reporters saying "there was no proof" and complained that her "experts were denied".

"We are seeing a violation of our justice system," she said.

ALSO READ: Few Trumpers who embrace political violence understand its endgame

Honig also pointed out that, historically, Trump's success legally in the Empire State has been touch and go.

"The broad notion is that New York juries are not friendly to [former] President Trump, I think that's pretty clear," he said.

The sexual assault revelations came during Trump’s presidency when Carroll, now 80, claimed she was in a dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman in 1996 when he attacked her.

She claims Trump since went on to publicly defame her, telling reporters “She’s not my type” and “Totally lying. I don’t know anything about her." “I know nothing about this woman. I know nothing about her. She is — it’s just a terrible thing that people can make statements like that.”

The latest trial involved defamatory comments he made while president, and are separate from the comments he was found liable for in his first trial. The judge had already found him liable the second time, and the jury was solely considering damages.

Watch the video below or at this link.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attempted an impression of the late Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) Monday during a ceremony to rename Joint Base Charleston in the South Carolina Republican's honor — but quickly admitted he'd botched it.

“I’ll never forget his accent. He sat there and he said, ‘gentlemen,’” Hegseth said at the ceremony, shifting into a gruff voice in an impression that he quickly abandoned. “I can’t do a Lindsey Graham's accent. It always devolves into a Trump accent.”

Graham spoke with what’s been labeled a typical “South Carolina drawl,” one that Charleston City Paper previously noted often dropped “R-sounding syllables.” With Hegseth admitting his impression sounded nothing like Graham, independent journalist Aaron Rupar unofficially dubbed the Defense Secretary’s bit as “the worst Lindsey Graham impression of all time.”

Hegseth went on to thank Graham for his help in “breaking recruiting records, for taking back the department from the ‘wokesters,’ and making sure that Iran never has a nuclear weapon,” though his last remark was recently contradicted by President Donald Trump, who reportedly told senior aides – privately – that he was willing to abandon securing a nuclear deal with Iran to end the war.

Graham died suddenly in July 2026 after suffering an aortic dissection related to hardening of his arteries, according to a preliminary medical finding. His office had initially described the incident as a "brief and sudden illness.”

He was one of the most influential voices in Washington on foreign policy, having advised Trump on the Iran war and Russia, and was among the war's chief architects, having pushed for years for direct confrontation between Washington and Tehran.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

President Donald Trump appended a new demand to his list of conditions for ending the Iran war.

The 80-year-old president laid out demands Monday for compensation from Iran in response to its Supreme National Security Council secretary, who insisted that the U.S. compensate for war damages and end its sanctions as a condition for reopening the Strait of Hormuz.

"It is an interesting idea because now I am likewise demanding compensation from Iran, for all of the people that they have killed and gravely wounded with their roadside bombs and many conflicts, for which they are famous, as led initially by General Soleimani, including the families of those killed on the USS Cole, and thousands of others killed in combat," Trump posted at 12:31 p.m. "Additionally, compensation should be paid to the families of the hundreds of thousands of innocent protestors that Iran has killed over the last 50 years, not to mention the 52,000 that have been killed in the last five months."

Trump said he would instruct U.S. negotiators to insist on compensation, but he added a new demand a little over an hour later.

"Also, with respect to the Iran negotiations, Iran should be responsible for the damages and death caused to the people of Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Gaza!" Trump posted at 1:37 p.m.

Trump claimed over the weekend that the U.S. was only "semi-negotiating" with Iran and indicated that he would allow economic pressure to build on Tehran as leverage to end the war.

A Trump-appointed federal judge green-lit a legal maneuver that could shield President Donald Trump's financial records from disclosure.

U.S. District Judge Roy K. Altman of the Southern District of Florida issued the ruling in Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC.

The ruling came one day before a court-ordered deadline that would have forced Trump's trust to hand over tax returns, financial statements, and ownership records for roughly 400 business entities, according to court documents.

According to Forbes, the subpoena covered individual Trump properties, Trump Media & Technology Group, the Trump Organization, crypto company World Liberty Financial, intellectual property, and personal assets including jewelry and art.

Trump's trust filed an emergency motion the day before the deadline, asking Altman to block enforcement of the order, according to court filings.

The deadline Trump's team was racing to beat had been set by U.S. Magistrate Judge Enjoliqué Lett, who issued a written order July 27 compelling the Trust to produce the records because Trump's own lawsuit put his finances directly at issue.

"All of President Trump's brand, properties, and businesses are impugned…and result in both economic and reputational damage, all of that is now at issue in the case," Lett said at the July 27 discovery hearing, according to court transcripts.

Trump's legal team had a counter-move ready, court filings show.

They filed an amended complaint that dropped claims of damage to Trump's brands and businesses, narrowing the suit to personal reputational harm only — which, they argued, made Lett's financial disclosure order moot, the filings show.

"[E]ven if there has been a harm to the brand, we are not pursuing that as part of our damages…It is simply the reputational injury to the President, full stop," Trump's attorney said at the July 27 hearing, according to court transcripts.

The same attorneys represent both Trump and the Trust, the court filings indicate.

The BBC's response was to accuse Trump's team of engineering the move specifically to escape financial scrutiny.

"[The] Plaintiff is transparently seeking amendment to recast his damages allegations in hopes of avoiding his discovery obligations. The Court should not reward this gamesmanship…" the BBC argued in its court filing.

Altman accepted the maneuver, but warned it "won't necessarily obviate the need for certain financial disclosures" — because Trump's $10 billion damages demand remains intact, the ruling shows.

The case is set for trial on February 15, 2027, according to court records.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}