Trump ducked a question Alina Habba asked him on the stand — legal expert explains why

Trump ducked a question Alina Habba asked him on the stand — legal expert explains why
Donald Trump at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center. White House Photo by Tia Dufour.

Donald Trump was asked, among other things, by his lawyer Alina Habba, "Did you ever instruct anyone to hurt Ms. Carroll."

Trump didn't answer the question — something at least one legal analyst finds telling.

Instead, Trump said, "I just wanted to defend myself, my family and, frankly, this presidency."

Former Southern District of New York prosecutor Kristy Greenberg pointed out that Trump didn't say "yes or no."

"That's the delta," she explained. "He knows when he makes these statements about E. Jean Carroll, he knows the influence that he has over his followers. It's similar to Jan. 6th, when he's putting out various messages about, 'Come. Let's be wild.' The idea that he would have no idea the influence he would have and what would happen, I mean, that's why Jack Smith has charged him with exploiting those messages and exploiting the violence that he knew would come. It's very similar here."

She recalled that throughout the trial the jury has been told about rape and death threats that were sent to Carroll after she accused him of raping her — before and after Trump defamed her by denying it.

ALSO READ: Alina Habba is persona non grata at her Pennsylvania law school

Trump has already been found liable of sexual abuse and defamation. The ongoing trial relates to separate defamatory comments he made about the same attack. The jury is considering damages as the judge has already ruled him liable.

"He knows the effect of his words," said Greenberg. "He knows when he keeps saying she's a liar, that he's never met her and she's this terrible person, he knows what will follow, and in fact, intends it. That was the argument from E. Jean Carroll's attorneys at the opening. He intended for this violence to happen. Once it became clear that these tweets were happening, at no point did Donald Trump say, 'Hey, cut it out. Don't threaten her life. Don't threaten to rape this woman.'"

Like with Jan. 6, Trump never told his supporters not to go on the attack, she said.

"So, the parallels are similar, and the fact that he did not answer that question, did you ever instruct anyone to hurt her, yes or no, just tells you that he really doesn't want to disclaim his influence from his supporters, because they're actually doing what he wants them to do," Greenberg closed.

See her comments in the video below or at the link here.

This is the question from Alina Habba that Trump never answered www.youtube.com

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

President Donald Trump blamed former President Joe Biden in a social media post for what he called a "terrible" murder that occurred in Dallas over the weekend.

"I am aware of the terrible reports regarding the murder of Chandra Nagamallaiah, a well-respected person in Dallas, Texas, who was brutally beheaded, in front of his wife and son, by an ILLEGAL ALIEN from Cuba who should have never been in our Country," Trump posted on Truth Social on Sunday night.

Nagamallaiah was a hotel employee in Dallas who was brutally murdered by one of his co-workers in a dispute over a broken washing machine, according to court documents published by CBS News.

A 37-year-old suspect has been arrested in the case, according to media reports.

The timestamp on Trump's post shows it was published during the memorial service for conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

"This individual was previously arrested for terrible crimes, including child sex abuse, grand theft auto, and false imprisonment, but was released back into our Homeland under incompetent Joe Biden because Cuba did not want such an evil person in their Country," Trump's post continued.

"Rest assured, the time for being soft on these Illegal Immigrant Criminals is OVER under my watch!"

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A prominent liberal analyst slammed Utah Republican Gov. Spencer Cox's press conference on Sunday, updating the public about the investigation into conservative activist Charlie Kirk's murder last week.

Sam Seder, co-host of "The Majority Report," responded to some of the claims Cox made during his press conference on a new episode of the podcast. He took issue with Cox claiming that the alleged shooter had a left-wing political ideology and the governor's discussion of engravings found on the shell casings.

"Spencer Cox wanted to end speculation about what was on the shell casings, and so he reads off what was on there, which of course is nothing but an accelerant and fuel on a speculative fire," Seder said. "If you genuinely wanted to inhibit speculation, you wouldn't release this information right now."

"It's sort of fascinating because this was a very dog whistle-laden press conference... There is a politeness about Mormonism that he's got to appeal to," Seder said. "He also knows that he's being viewed nationally, and so he's got to come off like he's calling for national reconciliation, but he does specifically say he was proud of Utahans by dog whistling 'We didn't have any George Floyd protests here.'"

"He didn't say George Floyd, but he started going through a litany of things," Seder added.

The Republican Party may regret some of the efforts it undertook to install Trump-aligned officials, according to a new editorial.

The Wall Street Journal's conservative editorial board published a new op-ed on Sunday arguing that the GOP's acquiescence to President Donald Trump's "executive-power excesses" gives Democrats precedent to use the same tactics against them. It was published at a time when the Senate appeared poised to confirm White House aide Stephen Miran to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

"A tragedy of the Trump years is the failure of Republicans to look beyond short-term tactical political calculations to the implications of their decisions for the long term," the editorial reads. "A progressive President will be able to point to Mr. Trump and Senate precedent if he tries to put a White House official on the Fed as Mr. Trump is now doing."

"The failure to resist Mr. Trump’s executive-power excesses today will hurt the GOP and the country in the future," it continues.

Miran may join the Federal Reserve at a time when Trump is seeking to exert control over the central bank. He has consistently attacked members like Chairman Jerome Powell and Governor Lisa Cook because they do not support lowering interest rates.

The WSJ editors argued that installing Miran would draw the central bank's independence into question. Miran has said he plans to keep his job in the White House while serving on the board.

"Everyone knows he will be speaking for, and answering to, the President," the editorial reads.

The editors also warned that the GOP's actions could harm the country.

"The GOP might regret the precedent the next time there’s a Democratic President," the op-ed reads in part. "Which there will be, maybe as soon as 2029."

Read the entire editorial by clicking here.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}