Kyrie Irving’s Anti-Semitism mess is bigger than him. It’s a symptom of what ails America
November 08, 2022
For customer support issues contact
support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to
corrections@rawstory.com.
Stories Chosen For You
Forty years after US president Ronald Reagan stunned the nation and world with his "Star Wars" plan to take nuclear competition into outer space, a new battle of the satellites has emerged in the stratosphere.
Largely because it far outpaced technology at the time, very little became of Reagan's March 23, 1983 declaration that the United States would head to space to seek absolute supremacy in the Cold War with the Soviet Union.
Nevertheless space ultimately has become a major theater of strategic competition -- just not the way Reagan envisioned. Instead of missiles launched from orbit to attack rivals, thousands of satellites are now the focus of sometimes tense dynamics between the United States, Soviet Union successor Russia, and China.
Also defying Reagan's vision, the US does not have any clear advantage: China especially is showing its ability to match or even lead the United States.
'Hope for our children'
Reagan's program was officially the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI).
But it immediately became known as Star Wars, for its evocation of Hollywood sci-fi visions of fantastic weaponry beaming through the cosmos.
That was where America's technological prowess would dominate, Reagan declared.
"I've reached a decision which offers a new hope for our children in the 21st century," he said, in language echoing the 1977 "Star Wars" film, subtitled "A New Hope."
Global security would no longer rest on the principle that neither the United States nor the Soviets could survive a nuclear exchange -- the so-called mutual assured destruction (MAD) doctrine, he said.
Instead, American technology would produce space weapons to instantly pulverize any Soviet nuclear missiles launched at the United States.
"We maintain the peace through our strength; weakness only invites aggression," Reagan said.
Satellite wars
Billions of dollars went into SDI, to develop space-based laser and particle-beam weapons and launchers for ballistic missile-destroying rockets.
But his ideas were unfeasible; the technology didn't exist.
A decade later, Star Wars disappeared, quietly folded into a more conventional nuclear deterrent program: ground-based missile defense.
Today, with Russia menacing Ukraine with nuclear weapons and China accelerating production of missiles and warheads, MAD remains the main reason nuclear war hasn't broken out.
Yet Reagan's vision of space as a battle theater did materialize.
Today, orbiting satellites are crucial tools of war -- and as the electronic backbone of ground-based conflict they are also the primary targets.
Back in 1983, satellites were large and hugely expensive; only about 360 were in orbit.
Now, according to the UN Office for Outer Space Affairs, there are 9,312 circling above us.
About 2,700 rocketed into orbit last year alone, according to Euroconsult.
Many are small, cheap and operate in networks for civilian communications, research and business use.
But hundreds, if not thousands, are military and intelligence units.
Some are launched as mini-satellite networks to provide early warning for ballistic missile launches.
Space stalkers
But they don't just conduct surveillance.
Washington, Moscow and Beijing have developed "space stalker" satellites that can be manipulated to physically interfere with others.
With robotic arms and grappling claws, "they can just stalk the opponent satellite and move it somewhere else, or bend an antenna" to render it useless, according to Brian Chow, an independent space policy analyst.
Experts say satellites under development will have weapons that can shoot rival units or send explosive charges to blow them up.
In addition, China and the United States both have ultra-secret programs of small, reusable, robotic, winged spacecraft which could be armed to damage a rival's satellites.
Meanwhile, the superpowers have abilities -- which they regularly use -- to jam and spoof satellite signals, doing so from both the ground and orbit.
All three countries have also demonstrated they can launch a missile from Earth that can destroy an orbiting satellite.
The Pentagon says China has ground-based laser stations that can interfere with if not disable satellites; presumably the United States and Russia have, or are developing, similar capability.
One thing Reagan did not envision was putting nuclear weapons in orbit. That was banned in the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, which most countries have joined.
But there have been few other limitations on space strife.
Last April Washington took one baby step in this regard, hoping to bring Russia and China with them.
Vice President Kamala Harris said the United States would renounce testing of ground-launched anti-satellite missiles, and urged rivals to do the same.
Such tests leave large amounts of dangerous debris circling the planet.
"Without clear norms, we face unnecessary risks in space," Harris said.
© 2023 AFP
CONTINUE READING
Show less
A new species of orchid with delicate, glass-like blooms has been discovered by Japanese scientists, who found the pink and white plant hiding in plain sight.
Despite its presence in Japan's parks and gardens, it took researchers at Kobe University a decade to confirm that the plant -- dubbed the "Spiranthes hachijoensis" -- was a previously unknown species.
"It was a surprise to discover a new species of spiranthes, which is so common that you can see it in parks, gardens and among potted plants," lead researcher Kenji Suetsugu told AFP Thursday.
Some of the samples were "from potted plants and gardens", including ones kept at a high school in Japan's central Gifu region, the phytology professor said.
"From its curious look and dainty blooms that resemble glasswork, this flower has long been loved by people," the university said in a press release.
The plant, with its spiralling blossoms, was even mentioned in Japan's oldest anthology of poems, the eighth-century "Manyoshu".
The discovery of the new type of spiranthes, sometimes known as "ladies' tresses", was announced last week in the Journal of Plant Research. It was given the name "hachijoensis" because many samples were found on Tokyo's Hachijojima island.
© 2023 AFP
CONTINUE READING
Show less
A legal expert explained why an appeals court ruling forcing Donald Trump's lawyer to turn over evidence is a "huge deal" for prosecutors.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell directed Trump lawyer Evan Corcoran to produce documents in a case involving classified documents stored at Mar-a-Lago, and former federal prosecutor Andrew Weismann told MSNBC's "Morning Joe" that was a damaging blow to the ex-president.
"The reporting is that Mr. Corcoran is going to say, 'It wasn't me, I wrote this, but I was told what to put in there by my client,' meaning Donald Trump," Weismann said. "You're absolutely right. This is a way of getting that direct evidence. How did that certification come about? Yes, it is very unusual for the prosecutors to seek this kind of order from the court. It is not something that has never happened, it happened during the special counsel [Robert] Mueller's investigation with the exact same judge, but it is unusual. In order to make this ruling, the judge has to find that it is likely that Donald Trump committed a crime. It's not necessary that the lawyer did, but at least the client did. The standard is likely. That's exactly what she wrote in the [Paul] Manafort case that I handled."
"So this is a huge deal," he added. "In terms of the case, this really could be the key evidence of obstruction. It also differentiates this case from what we know about the [Mike] Pence case and the [Joe] Biden case. There's absolutely no circumstance where we're thinking there is obstruction and false statements made. This could be a critical difference as to why the Department [of Justice] treats Donald Trump differently than the other two cases."
IN OTHER NEWS: Proud Boys trial thrown into chaos after defense witness revealed as government informant
Watch the video below or at this link.
03 23 2023 06 14 09 youtu.be
CONTINUE READING
Show less
Copyright © 2023 Raw Story Media, Inc. PO Box 21050, Washington, D.C. 20009 | Masthead | Privacy Policy | For corrections contact corrections@rawstory.com, for support contact support@rawstory.com.
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}