Jack Smith

Reacting to a Donald Trump screed about his impending indictment by the Department of Justice, MSNBC political analysts scoffed at the former president's belief that GOP lawmakers can intercede on his behalf to keep him from being indicted.

After the former president's lawyers received a DOJ notice memorializing that their client is the target of an investigation into his handling of classified materials after leaving office, Trump took to his Truth Social platform to rage, "No one has told me I’m being indicted, and I shouldn’t be because I’ve done NOTHING wrong.”

Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) suggested President Joe Biden may be guilty of "treason" and called on him to resign during an appearance of the Fox Business Channel.

The Arizona Republican claimed the president and his family had been engaged in unlawful dealings with foreign nationals that deserved impeachment and removal, and then possibly prosecution for treason.

A pair of struggling artists known for their outspoken "anti-war" views have been exposed as influence agents of the Kremlin who are trying to destabilize the Eastern European country of Moldova to help Vladimir Putin expand his Ukraine assault, reported The Daily Beast on Thursday.

"The couple, 37-year-old Aleksey Losev and 33-year-old Anna Travnikova, were sanctioned by the U.S. government on Tuesday for their role in 'the government of the Russian Federation’s destabilization campaign and continued malign influence campaigns in Moldova,' along with five other Russian nationals, a press release from the U.S. Treasury’s office said," reported Noor Ibrahim.

During an appearance on CNN on Thursday morning to discuss the possible Department of Justice indictment of former President Donald Trump, former attorney General Alberto Gonzales poured cold water on any hopes that current AG Merrick Garland would intercede on Trump's behalf.

Speaking with hosts Poppy Harlow and Phil Mattingly, Gonzales, who served under former president George W. Bush, stated it would be "politically dangerous" if Garland refused to go along with special counsel Jack Smith's recommendations, whatever they might be.

Noting that Smith has likely been reporting to the assistant attorney general on his multiple investigations of Trump, Gonzales claimed the only way Garland might intercede is if Smith broke the rules in some manner or if a new witness or evidence popped up.

"There are specific rules and regulations that the special counsel has to follow throughout the entire process," host Mattingly prompted. "Is there any situation where you as a former attorney general could see the attorney general going the opposite direction of whatever his special counsel recommends or says he wants to do?"

RELATED: Trump-picked judge Aileen Cannon lurks as threat to Mar-a-Lago indictment: Florida prosecutor

'Well, the only situation that I think that the attorney general would perhaps disagree with moving forward is if he is convinced that in fact the normal processes and rules and procedures of the department were not followed because they are intended to ensure everyone is treated the same," Gonzales replied.

"We want to make sure in this particular case no one could make the claim that Donald Trump has been treated any differently than any other American, or any other person, in our criminal jury system," he continued. "But that's the reason you have intermittent conversations between the special counsel and the D.A.G., the deputy attorney general, about what is the process, what have you found, what are your conclusions?"

"So it would be extremely unusual, and quite frankly, it's politically dangerous for the attorney general to disagree with the recommendation or decision of the special counsel and it would take extraordinary circumstances for that to occur in my judgment," he added.