Jeff Clark: Trump not guilty of insurrection because 'he left office on time'

Jeff Clark: Trump not guilty of insurrection because 'he left office on time'
Real America's Voice/screen grab

Former United States Assistant Attorney General Jeff Clark argued that Donald Trump could not be guilty of an insurrection because his efforts to stay in office ultimately failed.

During a Thursday interview with right-wing podcaster Steve Bannon, Clark disagreed with a Colorado Supreme Court decision that bars Trump from the state's primary ballot based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.

Clark said the 14th Amendment did not apply to Trump because the president and vice president were not explicitly named in the text.

"MSNBC, CNN, they try to portray it as some kind of technicality," he scoffed. "And the trial judge was willing to obey it, but not four out of the seven justices of the Colorado Supreme Court."

ALSO READ: Florida judge’s son is a neo-Nazi patron: data leak

"Their next argument is that, you know, they conclude President Trump committed an insurrection," he continued, noting "dozens and dozens" of pages backing up the court's ruling.

But Clark, who was one of 18 co-defendants charged alongside Trump in the Fulton County racketeering case, insisted that Trump did not meet the qualifications for an insurrectionist.

"But whether someone engaged in an insurrection requires scienter, which is the fancy legal term for the intent, you need to have the intent to try to overthrow the government," Clark opined. "And it's ridiculous to say that President Trump had that intent, because he specifically said — first of all, he left office on time, right?"

"But second, he told people to march peacefully and patriotically down to the Capitol, let their voices be heard," he added. "And so it's ludicrous to imagine that he could ever be found guilty of insurrection, which is why Jack Smith didn't charge him with it."

Watch the video below from Real America's Voice.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

During an appearance on MSNBC early Thursday morning, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) attacked House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) for keeping the House from doing its work, and then was cornered over why he and the Democratic caucus saved his Republican counterpart’s job over a year ago.

After making his point to “Way Too Early” host Ali Vitali that he has no intention of letting Republicans off the hook over Affordable Care Act subsidies that were the centerpiece of the shutdown, the MSNBC host asked about his relationship with Johnson.

According to Jeffries, “It was irresponsible for Mike Johnson to keep House Republicans on a taxpayer-funded vacation for more than seven weeks and to castrate, you know, the House of Representatives as it relates to his majority. At the end of the day, we're a separate and coequal branch of government.”

He added, “The problem with House Republicans is that they continue to function like a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Trump cartel, as opposed to what Democrats will do, which is serve as a check and balance on an out-of-control executive branch.”

That was when Vitali brought up Democrats voting for Johnson as Speaker when he faced a rebellion from some of his own caucus.

Vitali countered with, “I wonder if, given that you regret the way that the caucus acted when his job was in jeopardy?”

“No, I think that every moment calls for the best possible decision,” the Democrat stated after a pause.

“At the time, Joe Biden was the president, Senate Democrats were in the majority,” he offered. “We had a responsibility to continue to move forward, particularly in that instance where we needed to fund our ally, Ukraine. That's in a war defending not just their territorial integrity, but also principles of democracy and freedom and truth.”

- YouTube youtu.be

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A top Democrat warned that President Donald Trump may be willing to "go to war" to try and distract the American people from new revelations contained in the Jeffrey Epstein case files.

On Wednesday, lawmakers in the House Oversight Committee released a tranche of documents that contained new details about Trump's relationship with Epstein. In one email, Trump was described as being at Epstein's house with one of his victims for multiple hours. The email does not allege that Trump committed any crimes.

Another email between Epstein and a reporter shows Epstein describing Trump as "evil" and "nuts."

Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a Democrat, discussed the latest revelations from Epstein's emails on a new episode of progressive YouTuber Brian Tyler Cohen's podcast Wednesday.

"I think we've all expected that evidence exists of a close relationship between Epstein and Trump, but it is certainly news that there are actual emails between different folks around Epstein about Trump and how close they really were," Pritzker said.

"So my fear with the release of this information is, and more and more of course, with the swearing in of Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-AZ)...is that as they're able to release the rest of the Epstein files from Congress, you're going to see Trump doing everything and anything he can to distract," he continued. "And that might include going to war with Venezuela, which he's already on the verge of, apparently. Not to mention all the other mayhem that he could cause. So, I'm deeply concerned about that."

It appears the extent of President Donald Trump's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein is about to finally fall into the open. Left unanswered is whether anything means anything anymore. But even in this cynical age, perhaps almost quaintly, the matter of the infamous late financier and child sexual abuser probably still does. The world will soon find out.

Now, everyone sentient and sensible has long suspected that Trump was grossly involved in Epstein's world. How, we don't know — though of course, Trump was found liable for sexual abuse in another case, involving E. Jean Carroll. But he had to have knowledge of what Epstein did to his girls. At one point, the two men were best friends. Epstein surely wasn't the one who called his own plane "the Lolita Express." Those around him did.

Trump knew but did nothing. Then, recently, he did something. He blessed Ghislaine Maxwell's move to more comfortable prison surroundings, her conviction in relation to the crimes of Epstein, her former partner, be damned.

Keep that thought.

Because if there is one thing we know about Trump, he sympathizes only with himself. What may occasionally look like care for others is just expression of fear for himself. When talking about Maxwell, Trump "wished her well" — a lot more than he would ever say for judges, Democrats, Barack Obama, even George W. Bush. In the fate of Ghislaine Maxwell, Trump feels invested. Duly noted.

One of the weirder characteristics of emails in a wired world is that moments still get frozen in time. The emotions and motivations behind correspondences, references to certain people, remain as alive today as when first tapped out. Messages and urgencies conveyed long ago may always bloom again.

Epstein's own words are now laid bare. More will come out. Like the girls Epstein used, in a way, Trump will be exposed, with little to no defense. Then Trump will do what he always does: attack. Who? His critics, certainly. But Trump's escapes usually require redefining reality itself. After all, we now live in a world in which he was the purported victim of Russian interference in the 2016 election, and January 6 was a day on which patriots fought for democracy.

But reality cannot be redefined in the face of hardened evidence — like emails directly referencing Trump's alleged knowledge of Epstein's activities and time at Epstein's houses, or birthday cards with messages about "secrets." All are now coming out. This will mirror the reaction to the Access Hollywood tape, back in 2016: the supposed "locker room talk" in which Trump bragged about sexual assault. But this time we're talking about victims who were kids. And we're talking about cold, hard text:

Michael Wolff: “I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you — either on air or in scrum afterwards.”

Epstein: “if we were able to craft an answer for him, what do you think it should be?”

Wolff (next day): “I think you should let him hang himself. If he says he hasn’t been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency. You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt.”

It appears that Epstein wasn't going to say anything that would incriminate himself. But it also strongly seems that he had the "goods" on Trump, and others knew it.

Read the above while knowing that a man in his late 40s should never be spending social time around a teen girl — especially without her having a parent there. Never. All decent people understand that. Then read the words below, from 2011, Epstein to Maxwell, in legal jeopardy, still wondering whether his circle would hold:

“i want you to realize that that dog that hasn’t barked is trump.. [VICTIM] spent hours at my house with him ,, he has never once been mentioned. police chief. etc. im 75 % there”

The same day, Maxwell replied: “I have been thinking about that…”

Trump was a major figure in Epstein's orbit, a dog prominent enough that one bark could be fatal. But Trump hasn't barked — except to protect himself. Nothing for the girls, either.

Most men would push back, expressing sympathy for Epstein's victims and anger at themselves: "I didn't do nearly enough, and I am aching, thinking back to what those girls endured." But we know Trump, and he won't acknowledge anyone's pain but his own.

This scandal may not be enough to drive him from office. Only an exploding economy will wake enough Trump supporters to see him clearly. “Nice ballroom, Ace”.

But it is reasonable to link Trump to Epstein's crimes. He's the "grab 'em by the p---y” guy, after all. And he remains terrified. Epstein is dead but Maxwell got moved to comfy prison quarters after talking to Trump's former attorney, the deputy AG.

There's no way out of this one. Too many parents and decent moderates now sit with an undeniable fact. Trump knew, and never took a side against him or Maxwell.

Everything has changed. Maxwell likely won't get a pardon. What good can the "goods" do her? Watch Trump squirm. He needs to pardon her, but can't. This subject is fire, and too many people know it. FBI agents, Trump's cabinet, Speaker Mike Johnson. They know.

Trump is on his own, which is fitting. So were Epstein's girls.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}