President Donald Trump and his supporters are furious at the National Football League over the selection of Bad Bunny, a Puerto Rican rap star who has criticized the administration, to perform at the upcoming halftime show. But the NFL is making clear that its decision won't be renegotiated.

According to ESPN, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell "addressed the Bad Bunny controversy at his news conference following the NFL's fall meeting. It is the first time he has commented on the move announced in late September that garnered worldwide attention, including an increase in streams of Bad Bunny's music, along with backlash."

"It's carefully thought through," Goodell told the conference. "I'm not sure we've ever selected an artist where we didn't have some blowback or criticism. It's pretty hard to do when you have literally hundreds of millions of people that are watching." He added of Bad Bunny, whose real name is Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, "He's one of the leading and most popular entertainers in the world. That's what we try to achieve. It's an important stage for us. It's an important element to the entertainment value."

Trump himself recently jumped into the controversy, telling the right-wing Newsmax network during an interview, "I don't know who he is. I don't know why they're doing it. It's, like, crazy. And then they blame it on some promoter they hired to pick up entertainment. I think it's absolutely ridiculous."

In addition to the criticism of Trump, MAGA supporters are enraged that Bad Bunny is expected to perform the halftime show in Spanish. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) proclaimed the performer's work is "demonic" and asserted it's further proof English must be made the official language of the United States.

Meanwhile, Turning Point USA, an infamous far-right youth activist group that is still reeling from the murder of founder Charlie Kirk during a political event in September, has announced plans to put on its own "alternative" halftime show packed with performers they deem patriotic and pro-American.

A coalition of labor unions and progressive advocacy organizations on Tuesday launched the “Take Back Tesla” campaign, urging shareholders of the electric vehicle giant to reject a pay package that could make CEO Elon Musk the world’s first trillionaire.

Musk is already the richest person on the planet, with an estimated net worth of $458-485.9 billion as of Wednesday. His previous 10-year proposal, worth $56 billion, was invalidated by a judge. He’s now on an interim plan that has not been approved by shareholders, who are set to vote on the $1 trillion package at the company’s annual meeting next month.

Tesla’s board unveiled the proposed $1 trillion plan—which would be the biggest corporate compensation package in history—last month. Musk would get the full amount if he boosted share value “eightfold over the next decade” and stayed at Tesla for at least that long. He would own 29% of the company, one of several in which he holds a leadership position.

Top unions, such as the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and Communications Workers of America (CWA), joined groups including Americans for Financial Reform, Ekō, People’s Action Institute, Public Citizen, and Stop the Money Pipeline for the new campaign against “Musk’s money grab.” As part of it, they launched the website TakeBackTesla.com.

“How shareholders vote on Musk’s trillion-dollar pay package and other important Tesla ballot items will likely set the stage for similar attempts by other oligarchs to consolidate their own power.”

Several coalition leaders pointed to Musk’s recent efforts to get President Donald Trump elected and then help the Republican gut the federal government—which has been shut down for 22 days due to a congressional funding fight—via their so-called Department of Government Efficiency. The billionaire’s DOGE activities provoked nationwide protests targeting Tesla.

“In the last 12 months, Elon Musk’s attempts to destroy the American government have caused huge damage to the Tesla brand and contributed to a significant decline in the company’s sales in multiple key markets,” Stop the Money Pipeline’s Alex Connon noted, urging shareholders to “reject this insane proposal.”

AFT president Randi Weingarten said that “the Tesla board, instead of upholding basic governance standards, wants to green-light an outrageous $1 trillion pay package for a CEO who has spent most of the year engaged in childish political brawls, rather than working to create shareholder value.”

“To reward this destructive behavior with an obscene salary is a slap in the face—not only to the federal workers he’s fired, but to the retirees whose pensions are invested in Tesla stock,” she declared.

Dubbing the proposal “Musk’s corporate heist,” CWA president Claude Cummings Jr. similarly stressed that “Elon Musk is enriching himself by stealing from the American worker—from our infrastructure dollars for rural broadband to workers’ private data from the Department of Labor—and now he wants to steal $1 trillion from our pensions and retirement accounts.”

Natalia Renta, Americans for Financial Reform’s associate director of corporate governance and power, emphasized that the vote is bigger than Musk. She said that “how shareholders vote on Musk’s trillion-dollar pay package and other important Tesla ballot items will likely set the stage for similar attempts by other oligarchs to consolidate their own power.”

“This new website allows people to get their voices heard by sending letters to their state financial officer and mutual fund manager (if they have one),” Renta added. State treasurers of Connecticut, Nevada, and New Mexico have already joined mounting calls for shareholders to vote down Musk’s compensation package.

Ekō executive director Emma Ruby-Sachs argued that “no CEO is worth a trillion-dollar pay package, but especially not Elon Musk, who has wiped billions off of Tesla’s share value, trashed the company’s reputation, and driven millions of its customers away. Tesla’s shareholders need to show the judgment Musk so clearly lacks, and reject this pay deal.”