California congressman loses nearly $10K in mail theft

California congressman loses nearly $10K in mail theft
Anton Zubchevskyi/Shutterstock

WASHINGTON — Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA) is so concerned about mail fraud that he introduced legislation that would double the penalties for those convicted of theft via the U.S. Postal Service.

Now, it appears Calvert himself has fallen victim to the kind of fraud he's trying to prevent — the latest in a litany of lawmakers and political committees who together have lost millions of dollars in political cash to recent financial criminals.

For Calvert, his leadership political action committee — Eureka Political Action Committee — experienced an "unauthorized expense" worth $9,900 in late August, according to a filing with the Federal Election Commission reviewed by Raw Story.

Calvert's committee told federal regulators that it believes someone stole a check while it was in transit in the U.S. mail, which the thief "recreated and cashed to an unauthorized entity."

The Eureka Political Action Committee filed a police report and a fraud claim with its bank, Wells Fargo, it told regulators. It added that the thief was not believed to be "an internal bad actor."

Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA) is the latest members of Congress to experience a theft from his political committees.

Calvert's committee, which ended September with just short of $35,000 cash on hand, has not yet recouped the lost money, but expect to eventually get it back through the fraud claim process, Calvert chief of staff Rebecca Keightley told Raw Story.

In the meantime, "we have changed mail practices for any checks over a certain threshold will be sent via FedEx and for those under the threshold, checks will be wrapped in paper so as to better disguise the content of the mail," Keightley said.

She added that because "mail-related check fraud is a rising problem," the nation needs "stronger penalties in place for those breaking the law" and that the U.S. Postal Serves "needs to increase security of mail practices."

Numerous political thefts

Calvert, who ranks among the U.S. House's longest-serving members, having represented parts of inland Southern California since 1993, is hardly alone in losing political cash to wrong-doers.

In September, "an unknown individual created, forged and cashed a fictitious PAC check in the amount of $2,000," the federal political action committee of the Exelon Corporation, the nation's largest power utility company, wrote to the FEC last week.

The Exelon PAC said it notified its bank, Comerica, and the bank returned the lost funds on Oct. 2.

POLL: Should Trump be allowed to run for office?

These thefts are emblematic of a much larger problem in American politics of late: thieves together stealing millions of donor dollars from dozens of political campaign committees.

Many of the committees have acknowledged flaws in their internal security protocols. And some have failed to recover significant portions of the cash they’ve lost despite the efforts of law enforcement and banks to retrieve it.

Raw Story in recent months has identified several members of Congress and PACs who’ve been victimized by fraudsters in what’s become open season on politicians’ campaign accounts.

RELATED ARTICLE: Fraud warning: State Farm's political action committee victim of theft

Political committees for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, banking giant Goldman Sachs and the Oregon Republican Party are among the latest to get jacked.

In May, Raw Story reported that the Managed Funds Association PAC was targeted more than 20 times between Jan. 1 and March 31, initially losing $147,000 in fraudulent check payments, although it appears to have since recouped the money, according to filings with the FEC.

The Retired Americans PAC, a super PAC that supports Democrats, recouped more than $150,000 it lost in late 2022 after paying fraudulent bills sent to the committee, according to an April 21 letter to the Federal Election Commission, Raw Story reported.

The FBI got involved when Sen. Jerry Moran (R-KS) was the victim of a cybertheft incident late last year that initially cost his campaign $690,000.

Other current and former Republican members of Congress targeted by thieves include Rep. Troy Nehls of Texas (his campaign lost $157,626), former Rep. John Katko of New York ($14,000), Rep. Neal Dunn of Florida ($10,855), Rep. Russell Fry of South Carolina ($2,607.98) and Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida ($362.04).

The Republican National Committee and Rep. Diana Harshbarger (R-TN) also experienced recent campaign cash thefts.

Bipartisan targets

As Ocasio-Cortez’s situation underscores, the problem isn’t unique to Republicans: In November, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer’s campaign fell victim to check fraud worth $10,085, and President Joe Biden’s 2020 Democratic presidential campaign committee lost at least $71,000, according to Insider.

One-time Democratic presidential candidate and congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard and rapper-turned-2020 presidential candidate Ye, formerly Kanye West, are among others who reported money stolen from their political accounts.

At the end of February, the Business Industry Political Action Committee — the nation's oldest federal business — reported losing $14,156 to thieves, while the federal PAC of State Farm Insurance lost $12,220 to thieves, Raw Story first reported.

In March, the Energy Marketers of America Small Business Committee PAC reported to the FEC $5,000 in check fraud supporting Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND), and thieves went on a $195 shopping spree at Chick-fil-A with funds for Rep. Larry Bucshon (R-IN), according to a March FEC filing.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) is among the notable politicians to lose money from their political committees because of theft. (AFP)

Other fraud victims this year include Rep. Shontel Brown (D-OH), whose campaign was able to reverse a $621.96 unauthorized purchase on February 17, according to an FEC filing reviewed by Raw Story.

Rep. Greg Murphy (R-NC)’s campaign lost $2,500 with a fraudulent payment on February 27, according to an FEC filing, and the International Longshoremen’s Association, a labor union, was able to get a $726.42 fraudulent automatic payment on the same date reversed, according to an FEC filing.

RELATED ARTICLE: Crime spree hits one of Trump’s top supporters in Congress

The Build Political Action Committee of the National Association of Home Builders (BUILDPAC) reported $500 and some change in fraudulent debits on February 27, according to an FEC filing.

The McKesson Corporation, a pharmaceutical and medical supplies company, informed the FEC that it, too, had fallen victim to someone who "created, forged and cashed a fictitious PAC check for $12,000" on Nov. 7.

The McKesson Company Employees Political Fund notified its bank "immediately upon discovery of the fraudulent activity" and attempted to secure return of the lost funds.

"To date," the committee added, "the bank has not returned the stolen funds."

The political action committees of Google, National Association of Manufacturers, Consumer Technology Association, National Air Traffic Controllers Association, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, MoveOn.org, and law firms Akerman LLP and Blank Rome LLP have also experienced theft of various kinds, be it cyber theft, forgeries or check tampering, according to Insider.

Alexandria Jacobson contributed to this report.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

A former FBI agent revealed new details Tuesday about his firing under Director Kash Patel, saying he was dismissed over perceived disloyalty to President Donald Trump while caring for his wife, who was battling aggressive cancer.

“It was a nightmare,” said Walter Giardina, a veteran agent at the FBI who was among several ousted under what they called Trump’s “campaign of retribution,” speaking with the New York Times in a report published Tuesday.

He is among several who filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration last week,

Giardina is a 1999 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy, and was deployed to Iraq following the United States’ 2003 invasion. He also served in Afghanistan in 2011.

In June this year, however, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA) called into question Giardina’s impartiality at the FBI after allegedly being contacted by an FBI whistleblower.

Giardina was among those at the agency assigned to the Mueller probe, the investigation into whether Trump had engaged in espionage with Russia to help win the 2016 presidential election, and an assignment that painted a target on Giardina’s back.

Patel, a strong ally of Trump's, allegedly said that his agency had previously “tried to put the president in jail and he hasn’t forgotten it,” according to the lawsuit filed by the ousted FBI agents.

The allegations against Giardina snowballed, with Grassley accusing the FBI agent of having an “animosity toward President Trump,” and in a letter to Patel, suggested he may have even destroyed records. Giardina denied the allegations, all the while caring for his wife whose health was quickly deteriorating.

Giardina’s wife ultimately succumbed to the cancer, and two days after her funeral, he aggressively defended his record at the agency in a high-stakes meeting with bureau officials.

“It was unfathomable to see my entire life, which has been focused on family and the FBI, to be torn apart in an instant,” Giardina told the New York Times.

Giardina was ultimately fired, an ousting that was described as “inexcusably cruel” in the lawsuit filed against the agency, as were several other FBI officials deemed insufficiently loyal to the Trump administration, the plaintiffs allege.
THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A "secret sister" of Charlie Kirk has emerged — with an extremely different worldview to her conservative brother who was shot and killed last week.

Mary Kirk is a 29-year-old Chicago art curator whose progressive views stand in sharp opposition to her brother's conservative activism, the Daily Mail reported.

Mary's social media reveals a passionate support for Senator Bernie Sanders. In a 2016 Facebook post, she wrote, "#Tbt to when I met Bernie a year ago and had no idea who he was and now he is the light of my life," accompanied by a photo of herself with the senator.

But the Mail reported Mary wasn't always politically opposed to her brother. In 2011, she was a member of the Wheeling Young Republicans, an organization Charlie had previously led. However, by 2015, her political ideology had dramatically shifted.

Her social media activities highlight her commitment to causes her brother actively worked against. "Whitney Plantation is an inspiring example of what slavery education should look like in the US," she wrote on LinkedIn, urging followers to support the museum, the Mail reported. That stands in direct contrast to Charlie Kirk's criticisms of what he called "Black-centered education."

Mary has also advocated for museum funding and cultural institutions that were targeted during the Trump administration. She shared calls to action from the American Alliance of Museums, encouraging followers to protect funding for the Institute of Museum and Library Services.

Despite their political differences, close friends reportedly suggest that the Kirk family maintained a harmonious relationship, the Mail reported. Their parents, Robert and Kathryn Kirk, are described as non-political, with Robert being an architect and Kathryn a mental health counselor.

Charlie Kirk's recent death during his "American Comeback Tour" has sparked intense political rhetoric. While some right-wing figures have called for conflict, others have emphasized Kirk's willingness to engage in dialogue across political lines.

Mary Kirk has largely avoided the public spotlight, maintaining her progressive activism quietly while her brother became a prominent conservative figure, according to the Mail's report.

A former high-ranking FBI official criticized President Donald Trump's choice to lead the bureau Monday — and slammed his handling of the Charlie Kirk killing.

The 22-year-old suspect in the fatal shooting was arrested after a family member turned him in, and FBI Director Kash Patel has been revealing evidence in the case on Fox News as he defends the investigation. Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe told "CNN This Morning" that his approach stands out as unusual.

"I guess preliminarily what stands out to me is how much we know at this point," McCabe said. "It's really remarkable in the middle of an ongoing investigation of such momentous importance for the country. It's odd and unconventional that there have been this many releases of information, particularly from the FBI director, but essentially the basics of this case are very, very solid."

"You have an individual who was pretty clearly identified on fleeing the scene from those videos that we've all seen," he added. "You've got the murder weapon has been recovered. The towel that the murder weapon was wrapped in and a screwdriver found with the murder weapon. Both bear the DNA of the subject in custody, and now, of course, we've learned of this message that he apparently delivered in this very short period of time after being confronted by his family and right before being brought to law enforcement, he apparently got on his computer and sent a message to his friends on the application Discord and sent a message that essentially confesses to the crime. So the case seems very, very strong at this point."

But despite the solidity of the evidence, McCabe said Patel was making blunders that could weaken the case at trial.

"There shouldn't be a real difference between how [Attorney General] Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are handling those questions," he said. "I think Pam Bondi is doing it the right way. The difference in what we're seeing here from what we normally experience in mass shootings is that this case has to go to a prosecution. We have a subject in custody. The state of Utah, and possibly later the federal government, are preparing to bring cases to trial.

"So in that situation, you don't want to expose evidence outside of the context of the evidence you need to put forth in the indictment to receive the indictment. Now, we're going to see later today when he is officially charged in court, what evidence the prosecutors decide to reveal in the course of that legal filing. But typically you never discuss the evidence. You don't want to put anything in jeopardy."

"You don't want to give the defense a preview of your evidence before the trial, and you don't want to put this person on trial in the public," McCabe added. "It's a violation of their due process rights and can really cause you problems down the road. In a typical mass shooting case where the mass shooter commits suicide or is killed by law enforcement in or around the shooting, you don't have those same concerns because obviously there's no prosecution to follow."


- YouTube youtu.be

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}