Sold! Wealthy N.Y. congressman dumps up to $37 million in stocks and bonds amid pressure to divest

Freshman Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY), heir to the Levi Strauss fortune and one of Congress’ wealthiest members, has sold tens of millions of dollars worth of personal stocks and bonds, a new federal financial disclosure indicates.

The massive sell-off appears to position Goldman to finally make good on a delayed campaign promise: to create a congressionally approved “qualified blind trust” for his copious assets and shield himself from financial conflicts of interest, be they real or perceived.

Goldman’s office on Monday confirmed to Raw Story that the stock and bond sales are part of the process of entering into a blind trust, which will be finalized “imminently”. Goldman’s office declined further comment.

Under such a “blind trust” arrangement — rare among federal lawmakers — an independent body would formally control the administration of Goldman’s private business dealings, buying and selling investments as it sees fit, without the congressman’s knowledge or input.

Together, Goldman’s stock and bond sales — most executed during mid-July, per his disclosure — are worth up to $37.1 million. The actual value is likely somewhat less than that, as Goldman disclosed the values of his individual sales in broad ranges, as federal law allows.

Among Goldman’s more notable stock sales:

  • Tobacco company British American Tobacco Industries, up to $100,000
  • Tobacco company Altria, up to $30,000
  • Defense contractor Lockheed Martin, up to $50,000
  • Defense contractor BAE Systems, up to $15,000
  • COVID-19 vaccine maker Moderna, up to $100,000
  • Power company Dominion Energy, up to $100,000

Goldman first captured widespread national attention as a Democratic prosecutor during then-President Donald Trump’s first impeachment trial.

As a congressional candidate last year, Goldman, whose New York City-based 10th District includes Wall Street and the New York Stock Exchange, pledged to form a “blind trust” as he ran on an anti-corruption, pro-democracy platform.

“The fact of the matter is I have spent my entire career in public service, taking down gun traffickers, fighting against corrupt individuals, being a strong advocate for anti-corruption, and then obviously being in the trenches protecting and defending our democracy,” Goldman said during an August debate. “So whatever you want to reference, I was in a blind trust with all my money when I was a prosecutor. I will put my money in a blind trust as a congressperson.”

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Anti-corruption’ Rep. Dan Goldman made hundreds of stock trades after saying he'd create a ‘blind trust’

But during the first several months of Goldman’s congressional tenure, Raw Story chronicled how Goldman continued to buy and sell individual stocks at a frenetic pace through an unnamed investment adviser.

His hundreds of trades placed him among Congress’ most active traders among lawmakers, and Goldman’s office declined to explain why the congressman hasn’t simply abstained from trading while the often protracted process of forming a “qualified blind trust” played out.

Some of the trades involved companies with big business before Congress, including U.S. House committees on which Goldman sits: Homeland Security, Oversight and Accountability and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government.

“When elected officials are trading stocks at a time when they’re supposed to be overseeing companies, we need to make sure that the public has the faith and confidence that elected officials are doing the bidding of the public interest and not trying to line their pockets and do what’s in their private interest,” Aaron Scherb, senior director of legislative affairs for Common Cause, a nonpartisan government reform organization, said at the time.

Stock-trade ban?

News organizations including the New York Times, Insider, NPR and Sludge have documented rampant financial conflicts of interest among dozens of members of Congress, such as those who bought and sold defense contractor stock while occupying positions on congressional armed services committees or otherwise voting on measures to send such companies billions of federal dollars.

The executive and judicial branches are riddled with similar financial conflict issues, too, as the Wall Street Journal and ProPublica have reported.

Dozens of members of Congress have failed to comply with the STOCK Act. During the 117th Congress from 2021 to 2022, at least 78 members of Congress — Democrats and Republicans alike — were found to have violated the STOCK Act's disclosure provisions, according to a tally maintained by Insider.

And during 2023 alone, Raw Story has so far identified 19 members of Congress who have violated the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act’s public disclosure provisions. The most recent stock trade scofflaw, Rep. Kathy Manning (D-N.C.), is twice tardy, having failed to disclose trades within 45 days of making them.

A plan to enact a congressional stock-trade ban failed during the 2021-2022 congressional session after Democratic House leaders, led by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), declined to bring any of several existing bills — including one floated by House leaders themselves — up for a vote. President Joe Biden continues to remain silent on the matter, much to the frustration of many government reform groups.

But this year, many Republicans and Democrats alike have renewed efforts to ban their colleagues from trading stocks.

The most recent legislation introduced is the Ban Stock Trading for Government Officials Act, which would prohibit members of Congress, the president, the vice president, senior executive branch officials, their spouses and children from trading stocks and would require greater transparency with financial disclosures, The Hill reported.

Another two-party bill, the Bipartisan Restoring Faith in Government Act was introduced in May and is co-sponsored in part by political rivals in Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Matt Gaetz (R-FL).

Other materially similar bills include the Ending Trading and Holdings in Congressional Stocks (ETHICS) Act, the TRUST in Congress Act and the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who does not personally trade stocks, has expressed openness to entertaining a stock trade ban of some sort, but has not formally endorsed a plan.

Goldman spokesperson Simone Kanter previously told Raw Story that Goldman “supports legislation that would prohibit members of Congress from trading individual stocks.”

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

Donald Trump flew off the handle on Monday morning, attacking Van Jones, claiming the CNN personality once came to him “crying like a baby” for help, and now has deemed him a “dictator.”

Jones, who once famously praised Trump in his first term after the president honored the widow of a slain NAVY Seal during a joint session of Congress, telling his CNN colleagues, “He became President of the United States in that moment, period,” has always straddled the line between faint praise and then criticism.

On Monday morning, the president complained Jones is now calling him a “dictator” without providing a link.

On Truth Social, the president wrote that he finds Jones ungrateful.

"When a devastated (he was crying like a baby!) Van Jones of CNN came to me with a group of African American leaders, he had ‘DEAD’ in getting Criminal Justice Reform approved in Congress. Van Jones and these Black reps had been unsuccessfully fighting to get ‘Reform’ for many years. He was just wasting everyone’s time - Needed 5 Conservative Senators - there was no chance, or even hope, for a win. I liked some of the people he was with, agreed with what they were saying, and quickly rounded up the votes needed to get CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM approved,” the president claimed.

He further asserted, “It was NOT easy! Nobody else, including Obama, who tried to for years, could have done this! Now I watch this guy, Van Jones, every chance he gets, calling me a ‘Dictator,’ and far worse. He should be ashamed of himself!!! President DJT.”


THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

As the United States’ war against Iran continues to dominate news headlines, the Trump administration is simultaneously ramping up its attacks on suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean, attacks that several legal scholars continue to call illegal.

“Many expected that the lawless strikes – which amount to killing suspected criminals without trial – would end after U.S. forces captured [Venezuelan President Nicolás] Maduro at the beginning of the year,” wrote foreign policy analyst Max Boot in an op-ed published Monday in The Washington Post.

“There was, indeed, a pause in such operations. After conducting the 34th and 35th boat strikes on Dec. 31, the military did not carry out another one until Jan. 23. But since then, the strikes have ramped up again. At least 19 more strikes were carried out between Jan. 23 and April 26 – an average of one every five days.”

Boot suggested that the Trump administration was well aware that its defense of the “illegal” strikes was flimsy, pointing to the administration’s practice of releasing suspected drug traffickers that had survived U.S. strikes, rather than arresting them. As to why the Trump administration was ramping up its operation in the Caribbean now, Boot provided a chilling theory.

“There is a greater willingness by the U.S. armed forces to engage in illegal conduct,” Boot argued.

Furthermore, Boot warned that the Trump administration’s increased willingness to carry out "blatantly unlawful" operations didn’t bode well for the future.

“Congress has voted on resolutions to stop the strikes, which are in violation of the War Powers Act, but they were narrowly defeated, and even if they were approved, Trump could have vetoed them,” Boot wrote.

“So we are left with the disturbing spectacle of the U.S. military continuing to carry out orders that outside experts (if not the administration’s own lawyers) say are blatantly unlawful. If Trump’s hand-picked generals are willing to act so egregiously in this instance, what else might they do in the future?”

According to DC insiders, the race to assume the MAGA crown from Donald Trump as the Republican Party’s 2028 presidential nomination is a two-horse race between Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

However, as longtime GOP campaign strategist Rick Wilson wrote on Monday, there is a wild card in the mix who not only could use Donald Trump’s outsider playbook from 2016, but already has a base to lean upon that could elevate him in the early primaries and clear the field: former Fox News host Tucker Carlson.

Wilson argues that Carlson is employing a carefully calculated strategy: publicly maintaining friendship with Vance while subtly distancing himself from the administration through strategic criticism on Iran, Israel, tariffs, and cabinet appointments. "That smells…tactical," Wilson wrote.

Unlike Vance, who will inherit the baggage of Trump's presidency, Carlson possesses the media mastery and communication skills that made Trump formidable in 2016. "He has lived and breathed media and politics his entire life," Wilson explained. "His father ran the Voice of America. He has been a magazine writer, a cable host on three networks, a podcast operator, and a wildly successful streaming experiment."

Carlson's credentials dwarf those of other potential candidates. While Ron DeSantis "lacks charisma," Nikki Haley has no constituency, and Ted Cruz remains unpopular, Carlson commands massive audiences across multiple platforms — something no other GOP figure can match, Wilson maintained.

"What Trump had was thirty years of feral understanding of how cameras work, how attention works, and how to be the loudest voice in any room without seeming to try," Wilson wrote. "Tucker is that, plus decades in cable, including, for a time, the highest-rated show in cable news history, plus a post-Fox second act on streaming and Twitter that pulls numbers no other GOP figure can touch."

Wilson sketched out a plausible path to victory that mirrors Trump's 2016 trajectory. Iowa, with its evangelical-populist crossover and anti-establishment sentiment, is built for Carlson's anti-Wall Street, anti-war message. Farmers tired of being collateral damage in trade wars would be receptive to his platform.

According to the GOP campaign strategist, Carlson doesn't need to win Iowa — a strong second place finish, beating the establishment-anointed candidate, presumably Vance or Rubio, would suffice. Then Elon Musk could amplify his message through the Twitter algorithm, just as he did for Trump.

Then, in New Hampshire, where independents can pull Republican ballots and his mix of isolationism and anti-establishment populism would resonate, Carlson could secure a victory. Two top-two finishes would transform the dynamic entirely

"Now the dynamic flips," Wilson wrote. "He walks into South Carolina with two top-two finishes, and South Carolina, for all the talk about it being Trump country, is fundamentally a state that votes for the perceived winner. The MAGA base, watching him beat the establishment twice, decides he is the heir."

"This is not a fantasy. This is the same script Trump ran in 2016, with one decisive upgrade: Tucker Carlson, for all his vile beliefs, is not stupid," Wilson concluded. "But sure, laugh him off. It worked out so well with Trump."

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}