Sold! Wealthy N.Y. congressman dumps up to $37 million in stocks and bonds amid pressure to divest

Freshman Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY), heir to the Levi Strauss fortune and one of Congress’ wealthiest members, has sold tens of millions of dollars worth of personal stocks and bonds, a new federal financial disclosure indicates.

The massive sell-off appears to position Goldman to finally make good on a delayed campaign promise: to create a congressionally approved “qualified blind trust” for his copious assets and shield himself from financial conflicts of interest, be they real or perceived.

Goldman’s office on Monday confirmed to Raw Story that the stock and bond sales are part of the process of entering into a blind trust, which will be finalized “imminently”. Goldman’s office declined further comment.

Under such a “blind trust” arrangement — rare among federal lawmakers — an independent body would formally control the administration of Goldman’s private business dealings, buying and selling investments as it sees fit, without the congressman’s knowledge or input.

Together, Goldman’s stock and bond sales — most executed during mid-July, per his disclosure — are worth up to $37.1 million. The actual value is likely somewhat less than that, as Goldman disclosed the values of his individual sales in broad ranges, as federal law allows.

Among Goldman’s more notable stock sales:

  • Tobacco company British American Tobacco Industries, up to $100,000
  • Tobacco company Altria, up to $30,000
  • Defense contractor Lockheed Martin, up to $50,000
  • Defense contractor BAE Systems, up to $15,000
  • COVID-19 vaccine maker Moderna, up to $100,000
  • Power company Dominion Energy, up to $100,000

Goldman first captured widespread national attention as a Democratic prosecutor during then-President Donald Trump’s first impeachment trial.

As a congressional candidate last year, Goldman, whose New York City-based 10th District includes Wall Street and the New York Stock Exchange, pledged to form a “blind trust” as he ran on an anti-corruption, pro-democracy platform.

“The fact of the matter is I have spent my entire career in public service, taking down gun traffickers, fighting against corrupt individuals, being a strong advocate for anti-corruption, and then obviously being in the trenches protecting and defending our democracy,” Goldman said during an August debate. “So whatever you want to reference, I was in a blind trust with all my money when I was a prosecutor. I will put my money in a blind trust as a congressperson.”

RELATED ARTICLE: ‘Anti-corruption’ Rep. Dan Goldman made hundreds of stock trades after saying he'd create a ‘blind trust’

But during the first several months of Goldman’s congressional tenure, Raw Story chronicled how Goldman continued to buy and sell individual stocks at a frenetic pace through an unnamed investment adviser.

His hundreds of trades placed him among Congress’ most active traders among lawmakers, and Goldman’s office declined to explain why the congressman hasn’t simply abstained from trading while the often protracted process of forming a “qualified blind trust” played out.

Some of the trades involved companies with big business before Congress, including U.S. House committees on which Goldman sits: Homeland Security, Oversight and Accountability and the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government.

“When elected officials are trading stocks at a time when they’re supposed to be overseeing companies, we need to make sure that the public has the faith and confidence that elected officials are doing the bidding of the public interest and not trying to line their pockets and do what’s in their private interest,” Aaron Scherb, senior director of legislative affairs for Common Cause, a nonpartisan government reform organization, said at the time.

Stock-trade ban?

News organizations including the New York Times, Insider, NPR and Sludge have documented rampant financial conflicts of interest among dozens of members of Congress, such as those who bought and sold defense contractor stock while occupying positions on congressional armed services committees or otherwise voting on measures to send such companies billions of federal dollars.

The executive and judicial branches are riddled with similar financial conflict issues, too, as the Wall Street Journal and ProPublica have reported.

Dozens of members of Congress have failed to comply with the STOCK Act. During the 117th Congress from 2021 to 2022, at least 78 members of Congress — Democrats and Republicans alike — were found to have violated the STOCK Act's disclosure provisions, according to a tally maintained by Insider.

And during 2023 alone, Raw Story has so far identified 19 members of Congress who have violated the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge Act’s public disclosure provisions. The most recent stock trade scofflaw, Rep. Kathy Manning (D-N.C.), is twice tardy, having failed to disclose trades within 45 days of making them.

A plan to enact a congressional stock-trade ban failed during the 2021-2022 congressional session after Democratic House leaders, led by then-Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), declined to bring any of several existing bills — including one floated by House leaders themselves — up for a vote. President Joe Biden continues to remain silent on the matter, much to the frustration of many government reform groups.

But this year, many Republicans and Democrats alike have renewed efforts to ban their colleagues from trading stocks.

The most recent legislation introduced is the Ban Stock Trading for Government Officials Act, which would prohibit members of Congress, the president, the vice president, senior executive branch officials, their spouses and children from trading stocks and would require greater transparency with financial disclosures, The Hill reported.

Another two-party bill, the Bipartisan Restoring Faith in Government Act was introduced in May and is co-sponsored in part by political rivals in Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Matt Gaetz (R-FL).

Other materially similar bills include the Ending Trading and Holdings in Congressional Stocks (ETHICS) Act, the TRUST in Congress Act and the Preventing Elected Leaders from Owning Securities and Investments (PELOSI) Act.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), who does not personally trade stocks, has expressed openness to entertaining a stock trade ban of some sort, but has not formally endorsed a plan.

Goldman spokesperson Simone Kanter previously told Raw Story that Goldman “supports legislation that would prohibit members of Congress from trading individual stocks.”

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

US Rep. Ro Khanna on Friday demanded urgent congressional action to avert “another endless, regime-change war” amid reports that President Donald Trump is weighing military strikes inside Venezuela.

Such strikes, warned Khanna (D-Calif.), would be “blatantly unconstitutional.”

“The United States Congress must speak up and stop this,” Khanna said in a video posted to social media. “No president, according to the Constitution, has the authority to strike another country without Congress’ approval. And the American people have voted against regime change and endless wars.”

Watch:

Khanna’s remarks came in response to reporting by the Miami Herald and the Wall Street Journal on internal Trump administration discussions regarding possible airstrike targets inside Venezuela.

The Herald reported early Friday that the administration “has made the decision to attack military installations inside Venezuela and the strikes could come at any moment.” The Journal, in a story published Thursday, was more reserved, reporting that the administration “has identified targets in Venezuela that include military facilities used to smuggle drugs,” but adding that “the president hasn’t made a final decision on ordering land strikes.”

Citing unnamed US officials familiar with the matter, the Journal reported that “the targets would send a clear message to Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro that it is time to step down.”

Following the reports, the White House denied that Trump has finalized plans for a military strike on Venezuela. Trump himself told reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday that he has not made a final decision, signaling his belief he has the authority to do so if he chooses.

Last week, the president said publicly that land strikes are “going to be next” following his illegal, deadly strikes on boats in waters off Central and South America.

Trump has said he would not seek approval from Congress before attacking Venezuela directly.

“The American people oppose being dragged into yet another endless war, this time in Venezuela, and our constitutional order demands deliberation by the U.S. Congress—period.”

A potentially imminent, unauthorized US attack on Venezuela and the administration’s accelerating military buildup in the Caribbean have thus far drawn vocal opposition from just a fraction of the lawmakers on Capitol Hill, currently embroiled in a shutdown fight.

Just three senators—Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.), and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.)—are listed as official backers of a resolution aimed at preventing Trump from attacking Venezuela without congressional authorization. Other senators, including Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), have spoken out against Trump’s belligerence toward Venezuela.

“Trump is illegally threatening war with Venezuela—after killing more than 50 people in unauthorized strikes at sea,” Sanders wrote in a social media post on Friday. “The Constitution is clear: Only Congress can declare war. Congress must defend the law and end Trump’s militarism.”

Dylan Williams, vice president of government affairs at the Center for International Policy, wrote Friday that “most Americans oppose overthrowing Venezuela’s leaders by force—and an even larger majority oppose invading.”

“Call your senators and tell them to vote for S.J.Res.90 to block Trump’s unauthorized use of military force,” Williams added. “The Capitol switchboard can connect you to your senators’ offices at 202-224-3121.”

A similar resolution led by Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.) in the US House has just over 30 cosponsors.

Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) announced his support for the House resolution on Thursday, saying in a statement that “Trump does not have the legal authority to launch military strikes inside Venezuela without a specific authorization by Congress.”

“I am deeply troubled by reports that suggest this administration believes otherwise,” said Neguse. “Any unilateral directive to send Americans into war is not only reckless, but illegal and an affront to the House of Representatives’ powers under Article I of our Constitution.”

“The American people oppose being dragged into yet another endless war, this time in Venezuela, and our constitutional order demands deliberation by the U.S. Congress—period,” Neguse added.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

A federal judge on Friday gave a thumbs-down to President Donald Trump's directive requiring federal voter registration forms to include a requirement to provide proof-of-citizenship paperwork.

According to PBS News, "U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly in Washington, D.C., sided with Democratic and civil rights groups that sued the Trump administration over his executive order to overhaul U.S. elections," determining that this order would violate the constitutional separation of powers because the executive branch doesn't have power over election administration.

“Because our Constitution assigns responsibility for election regulation to the States and to Congress, this Court holds that the President lacks the authority to direct such changes,” wrote Kollar-Kotelly, who has been appointed to various federal judgeships under former Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.

Trump's order would have been carried out by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission. But under the ruling, they are permanently blocked from making such a change to federal voter registration forms.

Over the years, the president has tried to expand his crusade against immigrants to a number of facets of government administration.

He also triggered a massive controversy in his first term by seeking to add a citizenship question to the U.S. Census, despite warnings from experts that this would reduce response rates and make census data less accurate; the Supreme Court ultimately prohibited this change. And this week, Trump's Education Department issued guidance barring any employees of public service sector organizations that are found to be involved in illegal activity, including unauthorized immigration, from receiving student loan forgiveness.

Officials in Evanston, Illinois, are accusing federal immigration officials of “deliberately causing chaos” in their city during a Friday operation that led to angry protests from local residents.

As reported by Fox 32 Chicago, Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss and other local leaders held a news conference on Friday afternoon to denounce actions earlier in the day by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials.

“Our message for ICE is simple: Get the hell out of Evanston,” Biss said during the conference.

In a social media post ahead of the press conference, Biss, who is currently a candidate for US Senate, described the agents’ actions as “monstrous” and vowed that he would “continue to track the movement of federal agents in and around Evanston and ensure that the Evanston Police Department is responding in the appropriate fashion.”

As of this writing, it is unclear how the incident involving the immigration officials in Evanston began, although witness Jose Marin told local publication Evanston Now that agents on Friday morning had deliberately caused a car crash in the area near the Chute Elementary School, and then proceeded to detain the vehicle’s passengers.

Videos taken after the crash posted by Chicago Tribune investigative reporter Gregory Royal Pratt and by Evanston Now reporter Matthew Eadie show several people in the area angrily confronting law enforcement officials as they were in the process of detaining the passengers.



The operation in Evanston came on the same day that Bellingcat published a report documenting what has been described as “a pattern of extreme brutality” being carried out by immigration enforcement officials in Illinois.

Specifically, the publication examined social media videos of immigration enforcement actions taken between October 9 to October 27, and found “multiple examples of force and riot control weapons being used” in apparent violation of a judge’s temporary restraining order that banned such weapons except in cases where federal officers are in immediate danger.

“In total, we found seven [instances] that appeared to show the use of riot control weapons when there was seemingly no apparent immediate threat by protesters and no audible warnings given,” Bellingcat reported. “Nineteen showed use of force, such as tackling people to the ground when they were not visibly resisting. Another seven showed agents ordering or threatening people to leave public places. Some of the events identified showed incidents that appeared to fall into more than one of these categories.”

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}