Rudy Giuliani is cautionary tale against following Donald Trump's lies: analyst

Rudy Giuliani is cautionary tale against following Donald Trump's lies: analyst
Rudy Giuliani Mugshot (Fulton County sheriff's office)

Rudy Giuliani, once known as America’s mayor and now facing criminal election interference charges and a potentially bank-breaking defamation lawsuit, is a cautionary tale for America about what happens when you follow Donald Trump, political analysts say.

“I think he’s a cautionary tale for the whole country,” Tim Miller, former political director for Republican Voters Against Trump, told MSNBC’s Chris Jansing Monday.

“Rudy GIuliani is the prime example of people who have seen consequences for going along with Donald Trump’s lies.”

The former New York City mayor and member of Trump’s legal team headed to court Monday to face a $43 million defamation lawsuit from two Georgia poll workers he falsely accused of tampering with the 2020 election.

Giuliani famously accused the pair of passing around like illegal drugs a USB drive that later discovered to be a ginger candy.

As in Trump’s $250 million New York City fraud case, Giuliani was found liable before court proceedings began.

ALSO READ: Dear GOP: America is not going to forget — and many Americans will never forgive

Giuliani faces corruption charges in Georgia alongside Trump for his role in the campaign to challenge the 2020 election results, possible disbarment and financial troubles that saw him list his Upper East Side apartment, Jansing noted.

“All of this because he peddled Donald Trump’s election lies,” the MSNBC host said. “I don’t know that there are many downfalls this epic.”

Miller agreed, but voiced concern about Trump’s increasingly strong standing as the conservative candidate going into the 2024 election.

"The Republican party is lock step behind him right now," Miller said. “I think it’s a cautionary tale, but is anyone getting the caution?”

Watch below or click here.

For customer support contact support@rawstory.com. Report typos and corrections to corrections@rawstory.com.

A Republican lawmaker is calling for a change in Senate leadership amid escalating tensions on Capitol Hill over the ongoing government shutdown.

Rep. John Rose (R-TN) said Senate Majority Leader John Thune should step down, according to Newsmax’s Todd Starnes.

“We should call on Thune to step aside,” Rose said.

The remarks come as divisions grow deeper between House and Senate Republicans over how to handle the partial government shutdown, which has wreaked havoc at the nation’s airports.

House Speaker Mike Johnson has been at odds with Thune after the Senate passed a Department of Homeland Security funding bill aimed at ending the standoff. Meanwhile, lawmakers are preparing to leave Washington for a two-week spring recess even as the shutdown dispute remains unresolved.

THANKS FOR SUBSCRIBING! ALL ADS REMOVED!

The internet reacted with uproar on Friday after Attorney General Pam Bondi appeared on Fox News, saying the Trump administration has focused on "citizenship fraud."

Bondi spoke to Fox News about the Trump administration's immigration policies and the escalating "aggressive denaturalization efforts," prompting a number of responses.

"Being a citizen in our country is a privilege, not a right. And Donald Trump is going to have everyone in this country who deserves to be here who is a citizen," Bondi said.

Plenty of people had thoughts following Bondi's comments, rebuking her statements and calling out the administration.

"If true, get this disloyal anti-democracy moron on the first deportation boat for White Trash Island," former MSNBC host Keith Olbermann and podcast host wrote on X.

"What the f--- is that supposed to even mean? Of f------ course it's a right if you're a citizen. That's the dumbest f------ thing anyone has ever said on Fox, and there's some pretty dumb competition," writer and political commentator Kelly Scaletta wrote on X.

"Calling citizenship a 'privilege' kinda/sorta/definitely ignores how the Constitution works. If you’re a citizen, that's a protected right - full stop, not something a president gets to hand out or take away based on who they think 'deserves' it," operations team lead Stacey Wernick wrote on X.

"It literally is a right.. and you mean white people is who Trump wants," liberal commentator Rodger Williams wrote on X.

"Given the Admin's position on birthright citizenship, it's hard not to see this as a direct message to the Supreme Court," reporter and host Grant Hermes wrote on X.

"I envy the confidence stupid people have to just go on the news and say s--- like this," software engineer Alex Jewell wrote on X.

In yet another legal blow, a federal judge has dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit trying to overturn Minnesota's policy of giving in-state tuition rates to certain immigrants without legal status.

The case, heard by U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez, argued that Minnesota's policy is pre-empted by the federal Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, which states that "Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a State (or a political subdivision) for any postsecondary education benefit unless a citizen or national of the United States is eligible for such a benefit (in no less an amount, duration, and scope) without regard to whether the citizen or national is such a resident."

Specifically, the Trump administration pointed to the Resident Tuition Statute, its use in the Resident Student Statute that defines a "resident student," and these laws' use in qualification for the North Star Promise program for free tuition. They argued that technically, the way this is worded, some immigrants could qualify for free tuition that similarly situated citizens could not.

Menendez rejected this argument by pointing out that the tuition law doesn't solely apply to people who live in Minnesota, or universally apply to all people in the state; the requirements, she noted, are residency-neutral, only turning on how many years have been completed at a Minnesota high school.

"The plain text of § 1623 is clear: it does not preempt the Minnesota statutes because the Resident Tuition Statute does not determine eligibility for Resident Tuition on the basis of residence. Defendants’ Motion [to dismiss] is granted," wrote Menendez.

This comes as judges around the country find Trump's administration has been trying to illegally rewrite the law across the board, from immigration law to even infrastructure law.

{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}